Talk:Sheffield incest case
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sheffield incest case article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 November 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article name and scope
editIn spirit with my WP:BLP1E, I think we need to restructure the article to cover the event rather than the person. I agree that the current state of the article is much better and I commend Sticky for his tremendous work expanding it, but as with Josef Fritzl which redirects to Fritzl case, we should do the same with this article. Regards SoWhy 08:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Strongly agree. JohnCD (talk) 23:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Sheffield incest case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090122110422/http://itn.co.uk:80/news/fd565027c0747f9ca568a437fe87f679.html to http://itn.co.uk/news/fd565027c0747f9ca568a437fe87f679.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Gordon Brown quote
editI restored Gordon Brown as the source of the quote in the first sentence of "Response of government and local authorities". This had been changed in a fairly obvious act of vandalism in this edit: [1]. I can't find a source for the exact quote given but he did say something similar in an answer to Clegg at PMQs on 26 November 2008, see here: [2] --rbrwr± 07:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Difficult to understand sentence
editThe following sentence under the heading "British Fritzl" is hard to understand:
"Unlike in previous cases, no disclosure of police records or child protection files by corrupt (ex)-professionals who had worked the case was necessary for him to be exposed notwithstanding the injunctions."
Hopefully someone familiar with the intention could fix it, thanks.