Talk:Bijapur Fort

A fact from Bijapur Fort appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the large weight (55 tons) of the main cannon at the Bijapur Fort discouraged the British from carrying it as a trophy to England?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

India: Karnataka / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Fortifications / Asian / South Asia / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bijapur Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20100111080512/http://www.southwesternrailway.in/ with http://www.webcitation.org/5w9T1AdjD?url=http://www.southwesternrailway.in/ on http://www.southwesternrailway.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Scope of the article

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article seems to have entire sections devoted to structures that are not within the Bijapur Fort, such as Ibrahim Rauza, Saath Khabar, and Gol Gumbaz.

I've removed the Gol Gumbaz section as it has its own article which is well written and well sourced - so I imagine it is an uncontroversial decision.

I've created Ibrahim Rauza. The goal is to salvage all the material from this page for such structures, and incorporate it into their own pages. AmateurHi$torian (talk) 20:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic