Bee Branch Creek (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 1 December 2022 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Etriusus On the GA review, you told me to define the Bee Branch Watershed Project. Do you think that I should list all 12 phases and a summary or just keep it as is just saying that there are 12? The only source I currently have is from Iowa Homeland Security. Thanks, ✶Mitch199811✶17:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support per primary topic guidelines among topics that reliable sources describe as "Bee Branch Creek." There should be a hatnote to the stub for the California subject, and it arguably can't hurt to have a link to the Bee Branch dab even though the others do not appear to have "creek" included in coverage.--Yaksar(let's chat)13:34, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Within that disambiguation page, the creeks do not seem to be notable enough to cause issues. The only thing that might be able to be declared the primary topic is Bee Branch, Arkansas. I don't think that there is enough interference to be an issue though. ✶Quxyz✶01:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
To be clear -- I agree that the Iowan Bee Branch Creek is the primary topic for this term -- I just think the other, less notable Bee Branches noted in the DAB page justify including a hatnote at the top of this one once it is made the primary.--Yaksar(let's chat)21:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
