Talk:Battle of Ticonderoga (1759)/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Magicpiano in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am commencing the review. I read The Road to Ticonderoga some time ago but recall little of this so will be looking at the topic with a fresh eye. Colonel Warden (talk) 17:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I have made a first pass and find the article to be quite well-written. There seem to be two small grammatical errors in the lead though - move rather than moved and afterward rather than afterwards. The latter might read better as thereafter.
I sense a slight pro-French slant to the article, e.g. in the issue of the fort's name, but, as I am British myself, I shall AGF and attribute this to my own POV.
I shall now do some fact-checking. More anon. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I personally am indifferent to the name; this "battle" does represent the final surrender of the fort to the British, and it took a while to sink in that the British always called it Ticonderoga. I used Carillon in this article because the French were the occupants of the fort. As far as other pro-French slant, I think the French actions were more interesting than those of the British, but I didn't think I had given them undue weight.
- I'll fix the grammar in the lead. Magic♪piano 22:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Some minor concerns but overall it seems quite good. Well done.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Some concerns about the wikilinks which I will attend to myself.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Minor concern about national bias but not significant.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: