Talk:Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016) was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 19, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 July 2012. The result of the discussion was withdrawn. |
A news item involving Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 30 July 2012. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Battle of Aleppo (2012–2016), along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
Other talk page banners | |||
|
Index
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Old IP comments retrieved from GA
editIn cleaning up old GAs I found that some comments by an IP had been made on what was supposed to be a GA review page. The comments were overwritten by the GA review. I am posting the comments here to preserve them; they're old so are probably out of date anyway, but it seems wrong to overwrite and ignore them. I know nothing about this conflict so am not expressing an opinion about the validity of the IP's comments. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Im truly and absolutely ignorant about the internal procedures of Wikipedia, but bear with me, whoever, if any, editor read this:
What's up with the opening paragraph of the article? All the citations reference " West " sources. NYT, CNN, etc. And on fairly controversial claims. Cant hardly believe there's no credible sources from Syria POV ?
I try myself to keep an open mind on this topic, reading all the media available. But a total lack of Syrian or Russian POV or at least citations on the " war crimes " topic seems like a serious oversight.
Just read this with a neutral eye :
" Various claims of war crimes emerged during the battle, including the use of chemical weapons by Syrian government forces[103] as well as barrel bombs by the Syrian Air Force,[104][105][106][107] the dropping of cluster munitions on populated areas by Russian and Syrian forces,[108][109] the carrying out of "double tap" airstrikes to target rescue workers responding to previous strikes,[110] and the use of highly inaccurate improvised artillery by rebel forces.[111] During the 2016 Syrian government offensive, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights warned that "crimes of historic proportions" were being committed in Aleppo.[112]"
Where are the proofs of these claims? Not on the citations, thats sure. What about Siryan or Russian arguments? Not a SINGLE citation?
I came here to try and find an unbiased, unified brief of the conflict, but after those first lines, its obvious WHO is writing this article.
Seems like the battle was between some US coalition and " SOMEONE ".
Truly dissapointed.
Thanks for reading.
Edit : CITATIONS :
https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Syria%E2%80%93United_States_relations#Since_2008
https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/American-led_intervention_in_Syria#Reactions
How come the most important battle of the war have no reference about these claims? CIA involvement? Legality of coalition presence? Shouldnt the first paragraph speak about the origins or causes of the conflict instead of jumping directly to "claims" of war crimes? And from the mouth of the only side who ILLEGALY participated? ( And arguably provoked it? ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.175.235.183 (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Should it be renamed First Battle of Aleppo
editWith the ongoing battle in aleppo should this be renamed? I didn't want to make such a big change without asking. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- If there are no reliable sources calling it as such and if its not the common name among sources then no. Currently, the other "Battle of Aleppo" is actually having a discussion on renaming it to "Fall of Aleppo". So, no "second" battle. EkoGraf (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- It's just common sense, it's hardly a fall considering it was a three way battle that resulted in assad's forcing pulling back and democratic forces being encircled. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 20:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)