Talk:Antheridium
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antheridium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111109071540/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Fern to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Fern
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Dear Authors, this is a good, short article. However, it is missing some needed citations is specific cases. It is also lacking in a more detailed description of which plant groups have antheridia and which do not, specifically in angiosperms and gymnosperms. Specific exceptions to the rule that antheridia are reduced to a single generative cell in angiosperms should be noted and cited appropriately. Overall, a good, short article. Might want to briefly mention their difference from archegonia at the beginning to provide more context to the reader.Jlwatts98 (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)