Talk:All Saints Anglican Church, Canberra
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dave Rave in topic Merge talk ?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Edit roll backs about service times
editI have rolled back twice info about the congregation - I don't beleive it is neutrally expressed and I don't believe service times are encyclopaedic--A Y Arktos\talk 11:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
About the people
editI have placed information about the congregation there because the congregation is the custodian of the building, not some railway enthusiast like you. Mass times are a statement of fact - there is no bias in this.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.102.239.195 (talk • contribs) 10:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC+10 hours)
- I am not a railway enthusiast I am interested in writing an encyclopaedia. The statement that the community is vibrant etc is point of view - please refer to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - this is not an advertising space. --A Y Arktos\talk 01:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- I concede that it is not an advertising space, and hence I did not reinsert the mass times, but I would also urge you to consider that the community which inhabits a church building is an integral part of that building's story. Is there a compromise that you might be prepared to reach with regards to a statement about that community? It is certainly Anglican, but it is a particular type of Anglicanism that is fairly unique to Canberra. If you were going to police everything that was said about Christian communities based on your present POV, why aren't you editing the article about Sydney Anglicans, for instance?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.102.239.195 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC+10 hours)
- Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.
- I have edited many articles on the wikipedia but not one about Sydney Anglicans, not a topic at present that intersts me - if you have issues with that article, feel free to edit it.
- If you are interested in contributing to the encyclopaedia please refer to the resources to help new Wikipedians which include:
- Please also take not of one of the fundamental policies: Wikipedia:No original research. If you wish to assert that the congregation of this curch is "particular type of Anglicanism that is fairly unique to Canberra" you need to ensure that you are not putting forward any unpublished theories, data, statements, concepts, arguments, or ideas; or any new analysis or synthesis of published data, statements, concepts, arguments, or ideas. You need to ensure Verifiability by Citing sources and these sources need to compy with the standard for Reliable sources. Until you manage to cite reliable sources for your assertion, I will revert. I will call on other editors to review my actions.--A Y Arktos\talk 21:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Merge talk ?
editis that notice hanging around for a reason ? 2c - i'd merge this one into that one, better naming, suburb state locality naming convention ? Dave Rave (talk) 05:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC)