Talk:2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election

Speculations cannot be added on Wikipedia

@GJ 06 You have re-added the speculatory content that I had removed. Now I see @YttriumShrew has removed it again. Please follow WP:V. We cannot add anything based on speculations. Any content that is without a reliable source can be challenged and removed. It should not be restored without backing up with a reliable source. If you think that the reliable source may be available in future, then you should wait for that time and only add it back with the reliable source. Continued addition of unsourced and specualatory content is considered disruptive. Same goes for empty tables. Venkat TL (talk) 07:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

The alliance mentioned between NCP and INC is also a purely speculative one, furthermore they did not ally with each other in 2017 & fought the 2021 local elections separately, yet they are mentioned to be within UPA. In contrast BTP & AIMIM fought the 2021 local elections together and have declared their intention to fight the assembly polls together.

source https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/aimim-to-fight-next-assembly-polls-in-gujarat-in-alliance-with-bharatiya-tribal-party20201226205408 GJ 06 (talk) 09:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

GJ 06, this is acceptable as it is sourced. But Congress NCP Gujarat alliance need to be sourced separately. Please do not revert back unsourced stuff. Thank you. --Venkat TL (talk) 10:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• જગદીશ ઠાકુર.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

AAP

@Joe de Jointe you need to check 2021 Gujarat local elections. It is third largest party in 2021 Gujarat local elections based on vote share and number of seats. AAP alliance has 2 seats in the Assembly, and most importantly media coverage of this party is on par with BJP or Congress. Please discuss your objections on the talk page. Venkat TL (talk) 09:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover please discuss your edit. Venkat TL (talk) 06:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover, @Ok123l There is no such 5% rule. Reliable sources are giving AAP prime coverage alogn with BJP and Congress. AAP has substantial presence in local bodies. See above comments. Please do not remove this without consensus. Venkat TL (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Then why in Punjab Assembly election NDA alliance was not shown because it has less than 5% votes according to your prediction but infact BJP has got more seats Het666 (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Due to media coverage. See WP:Reliable source Venkat TL (talk) 11:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

What sources are you talking about? Het666 (talk) 11:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

You can pick up any reliable source about 2022 Guj Election. Example : [1] and [2] Venkat TL (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Last revert AAP in infobox

Venkat TL Can you please enlighten me as to how rearranging the infobox the conventional way based on the number of votes and seats that parties gathered in previous elections is non-constructive? TheWikiholic (talk) 02:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1115634371/1115702415, Special:Diff/1116064204 removing content from Infobox and Edit warring against talk page consensus. Venkat TL (talk) 07:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

There isn't any consensus on this talk page or anywhere else. And FYI we don't use the voting percentage or number of seats of local elections on Wikipedia pages of state elections or general elections. TheWikiholic (talk) 12:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please point me to the rule that you are following. As far as I am aware Wikipedia articles are written on what Reliable sources say. Not speculations by Editors. Venkat TL (talk) 17:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

I never cited any rules here. I was talking about a common practice that has been followed and maintained by the community over the years. If you have any doubt you can verify that by checking the categories of different elections of the legislative assembly. An infobox is not a place to project the speculation of either editors or the media. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Clearly you must have misunderstood the practice. The only rule is to follow and publish what the reliable source say. Not what you believe. No media source is calling BTP as a contender to win the election. Venkat TL (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Vanamonde93, RegentsPark, Kautilya3 Do we have any policy that allows the info box to project speculations based on media reports? The Wikipedia infobox related to Indian elections has been arranged based on either the number of seats or the percentage of votes that a party got in their previous election. However, Venkat TL has been inserting AAP into the infobox of this page and this page even though APP has never won any single seat or a minimum of 1 percent vote in the 2017 previous Gujarat election. Parties like BTP and NCP also got more votes and seats in the previous election than AAP in the previous elections. Even though  I told him infobox is not a place to project the speculation of either editors or the media, and that these kinds of projections can be added to the section opinion poll, he kept insisting on restoring the edits of multiple editors.  What are your thoughts on this?— TheWikiholic (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Is this a dispute about whether the AAP is listed alongside the other two parties in the infobox? Because if so, that is indeed based on whether reliable sources treat it as a serious contender for seats. I have no opinion on whether that is in fact the case here. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

What media houses are saying saying shall not be considered but last result and position of that party in current assembly shall be considered not speculation by media BTP shall be in infobox or keep only two alliance NDA and UPA Het666 (talk) 03:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Without consensus so many sourced information removed Het666 (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Vanamonde93 is right in his comment, "that is indeed based on whether reliable sources treat it as a serious contender for seats." You can pick up any reliable source about 2022 Guj Election And it will discuss AAP as a contender in this election along with BJP and Congress. Example : [3] and [4] None of the reliable source claim that NCP or BTP is a serious contender for winning the election. TheWikiholic is making up his own rules and trying to enforce them on this page. When I challenged him to point me to the rules, he then made hand waves claiming them as practice and has now canvassed editors to this discussion thread. Venkat TL (talk) 10:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

• If reliable sources cover AAP as a major contender in the elections, then it is ok to include them in the infobox, even if they finally end up with their previous 0.1% of the vote and 0 seats. Weight, on wikipedia, comes from reliable sources. --RegentsPark (comment) 22:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Content removed without giving reason

@Ok123l I have reverted your unexplained removal of sourced content while adding new content. Please don't remove existing content while you add new ones. Follow chronology while adding new content and do not copy paste. Venkat TL (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Dont use Twitter as a source on Wikipedia

User:Ok123l I have Remove twitter links used as source that you had added. Twitter is not a reliable source. If no reliable source reported this info, then it is not important enough and this does not belong on Wikipedia. Also note that WP:TOI is not reliable Venkat TL (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

What better source can you get about Congress' promises than Congress itself? Ok123l (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Godi media wont cover stuff, thats the media's problem Ok123l (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

@Ok123l Wikipedia prefers Secondary and tertiary source instead of primary sources. Read WP:PSTS to understand what it means and why. Twitter is not considered reliable at all. Please do not restore twitter as source. I agree that Godi media cannot be used as source, but there are non godi media sources too. You can use more reliable sources, like NYT, BBC, NDTV, TheHindu Indian Express etc. If it is notable, they will cover it. Venkat TL (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Order of Sections

@Dhruv edits, we should follow the order of sections as given on MOS:INDELECT. The issues section and campaign section will have some overlap and should be together. The Manifesto section should be before Campaign section. This is the standard in other international election articles too. What is the reason for putting manifesto, in between issues and campaigns? Venkat TL (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Congress copied AAP promises

Aam Aadmi Party announed Mohalla clinics for Gujarat along the lines of those it built in Delhi, Congress copied the promise and announced to open 'Janata Dawakhana' (Public pharmacy).

Ok123l what is your objection with this line, it is reliably sourced. Where do you think it should be mentioned if not in Manifesto section? Venkat TL (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Maybe add a subheading controversies on manifesto Ok123l (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

I mean, Mohalla clinics offer basic health facilities in a community, India has probably has such things in the past before the AAP introduced it. Ok123l (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

@Ok123l I am not going to discuss benefits of Mohalla clinic on this thread, suffice to say that Reliable source say it has received international acclaim. Creating a controversy section for one line is an overkill. Since it is about manifesto, it is in the intro of manifesto section. another option is to include it in Congress manifesto section. I am ok for both. Venkat TL (talk) 17:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

@Venkat TL It is looking very out of place in intro of the section. Should be included under Congress subsection. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

@Dhruv edits ok. I am fine with the move. Venkat TL (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Translated this article to Hindi

I've translated this article to Hindi, check it out: Translated this article to Hindi, check it out. If you're interested, please help me improve the page. Ok123l (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

https://hi.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=2022_%E0%A4%97%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8_%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%9A%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5 Ok123l (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Translated article to Gujarati

I've translated this article to Gujarati: https://gu.wiki.x.io/wiki/%E0%AA%97%E0%AB%81%E0%AA%9C%E0%AA%B0%E0%AA%BE%E0%AA%A4_%E0%AA%B5%E0%AA%BF%E0%AA%A7%E0%AA%BE%E0%AA%A8%E0%AA%B8%E0%AA%AD%E0%AA%BE_%E0%AA%9A%E0%AB%82%E0%AA%82%E0%AA%9F%E0%AA%A3%E0%AB%80,_%E0%AB%A8%E0%AB%A6%E0%AB%A8%E0%AB%A8 Ok123l (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

No. It was only expanded with machine translation. Please don't add translation unless you are fluent with the Gujarati language. -- Kartik Mistry ^talk 06:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Gautam Adani

Why Gautam Adani is being referred as Narendra Modi ally sourced through a Jeff Bezos owned media ? Mundra port was developed by Adani during Congress rule in Gujarat, Adani has also been involved with Congress governments like in Maharashtra MVA and Gehlot led Rajasthan government's solar projects, and even the Hansdeo forest coal projects under the Congress led government in Chhattisgarh? Even the communists in Kerala have given some projects to Adani. How does the RNDTV takeover indicates that Gautam Adani is "Narendra Modi ally" ? सत्यान्वेषी (talk) 04:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

I will not debate Washington Post's authenticity as it is widely known for publishing factual news (See WP:RS/P). It is very clear that Adani is very close aide of Modi as his government has been waiving off gigantic loans of Adani. Now even if Adani got Mundra port during Congress, today they are a Modi ally. In the Washington Post's article, they didn't link NDTV takeover to Adani. They basically just said he is already a Modi ally and he is taking over an independent news channel. And what if Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos? Is he putting fake news in it? No. So that's a useless claim. If the Washington Post isn't enough, TheGuardian and DW News. Ok123l (talk) 05:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

If waiving loans makes Adani an ally of Modiji then what about the cheap land made available to Adani by the Congress governments of Gujarat ? Also the frustration of Congress workers is clear as they are losing control over all the institutions and governments and will be routed soon in Gujarat too, people know it better, and for the part of RNDTV, the meltdown in Gujarat results will be a pleasing sight of a landslide victory of BJP, and about China lover Washshitton post, its love for communists is not hidden, Thanks

सत्यान्वेषी (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm not trying to debate whether BJP will win or not but the fact that Adani is an ally of PM Modi is widely known and properly sourced by a reliable news source so it's not a baseless claim. Period. Ok123l (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

@Ok123l One IP user has removed this again. I suggest it should be added into the article. Venkat TL (talk) 13:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

@Venkat TL I re-added it. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @Dhruv edits @Venkat TL Ok123l (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

I don't why Gautam Adani is shown as Narendra Modi's ally nor he is affiliated with any of the political party how can he be ally of a political leader nor he is only working for Narendra Modi Het666 (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

It is based on reliable source and relevant to this page. See above. Venkat TL (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

The article referenced is about Advani's acquisition of ndtv media then how can it be related to Gujarat Het666 (talk) 10:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Are all sourced data relevant to any topic Don't put any information which has no link to 2022 Gujarat Assembly election Het666 (talk) 10:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Opinion poll survey

Closing section created by a sockpuppet per WP:SOCKSTRIKE EvergreenFir (talk) 18:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Opinion poll survey is added and somebody reverted without any reason. OPiniion polls and surveys are included in various related wiki pages see below for reference. https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/2017_Uttar_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election#Opinion_polls — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gidua (talk • contribs) 05:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC) can somebody create an infobox for the same @Bishonen Gidua (talk) 05:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC) Huh..? The article has an infobox. But I looked, and, Gidua, do you realize that your latest revert restored the IP's edit also, i.e. you restored their removal of a good reference? That seems like a seriously bad idea. Altogether, you shouldn't be edit warring over your insertion, but first wait for possible consensus for it here in this discussion you've opened. Bishonen | tålk 08:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC). thanx for adding the infobox Gidua (talk) 10:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC) There is no consnsus to add the survey opinion poll data. Please refer to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Election: Article structure#Surveys and polls. Only reputed polling agencies who are transparent and released their sample size error % data can be added. The error percentage is not a range but a number. That itself is a sign that this is another fraud poll by C Voter. C Voter has been accused by all parties of being biased for a particular party, moreover C Voter has not released their sample size or error % so they should not be added. CVoter has been established to have conducted fraud polls see The Fraud Called Opinion Polls. All political parties and the Election Commission of India have called these opinion polls as fraudulent. Wikipedia should not be used to promote these paid news and fraud polls. In any case Please do not restore this section without a clear consensus. If internationally reputed polling agencies (e.g. Nielson) conduct polls and release data they can be suggested to be added. CVoter is neither trusted nor reputed, in fact they have a history of being caught manipulating. Please do not add it again. See WP:ONUS. Venkat TL (talk) 12:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC) Political parties in India always blame opinion polls if the result of the poll are not in there favor. So the reliability of opinion polls are an invalid argument. @Venkat TL keep ranting about C Voter is a fraud and paid poll without giving any credible evidence. It seems only @Venkat TL is not in agreement with this addition Gidua (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC) @Gidua Look it is not me who is ranting. ALL political parties except one have called out these Opinion polls fraudulent. Let alone parties, Even the Constitutional Body, Election Commission of India have called it as fraudulent and asked for ban on it. See below. Election Commission of India (ECI) (2014) "We have reminded the Union government a dozen times since we made our first request to ban opinion poll and exit poll surveys in 1997…Opinion polls influence unlettered and undecided voters. They can misguide young voters, too". The Election Commission (EC) of India cannot ban opinion polls ahead of elections; all it can do is remind the Union government about its long-pending request. Source (2014) In a communication to the ministries of Corporate Affairs and Information and Broadcasting, the EC has said the matter involves allegations of conspiracy to prepare false reports/polls for publishing misleading information on consideration of illegal payment of money in return. "Therefore, it is requested that this complaint may be looked into urgently for appropriate action at your end," K Ajaya Kumar, the Principal Secretary of Election Commission of India wrote to the secretaries of the two ministries. "The allegation is that the organisations have agreed to manipulate the results of opinion polls by tweaking figures for publishing to the general public," the poll panel noted. "Congress cries foul over manipulation of opinion polls, Election Commission urges Centre to act". The Economic Times. There is no consensus to add the controversial and fraudulent polls. Please dont misrepresent consensus. Venkat TL (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC) It was all hunky and dory until the same pollster predicted an AAP sweep in Punjab and Delhi. It was neither controversial nor fraudulent. I barely saw any section highlighting BJP's campaign or Manifesto, until now. I added a section detailing BJP's campaign today, and suddenly the page is semi-protected. I think its time Wikipedia comes out of the garb of being neutral and shows what it truly represents. Iamashu95 (talk) 16:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC) I was about to give the same arguement. @EvergreenFir didnt even bother to give a look at the arguements given in the talk before reverting. C Voter was used as relible source untill today. But now today it is unreliable ? As an admin @EvergreenFir need to make sure that its reliability shall be discussed at appropriate forum which is WP RSN. This is not expected from an admin Gidua (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC) Stopping disruption is an admin's job. Edit warring is disruptive. If consensus forms on the talk page to add that content, then it will be added. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC) Pinging Bishonen EvergreenFir (talk) 17:11, 4 October 2022 (UTC) I can understand that you have stopped the disruption by protecting the page for 2 days., and thats OK. But you have reverted an edit which is centre of dispute is questionable. Gidua (talk) 17:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC) C Voter has been used as RS multiple times. But i can understand that any body can question its reliability at any time. But the appropriate place to raise a dispute regarding its reliability is WPRSN, as an admin EvergreenFir you have to act neutrally by pointing @Venkat TL towards a right course of action . But you have failed in thatGidua (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

• (edit conflict) Since Evvie pinged me in the hatted section above, I'll mention that I was just writing up a sharp warning to Gidua about their varied disruption at this article. But I see they have now been indeffed as a sock by a checkuser. Bishonen | tålk 18:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC).

Opinion polls

Why opinion polls are not added to this page? Like recently ABP made a poll with almost 60000+ people. That should be added. 106.77.79.170 (talk) 18:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

because Election Commission of India (ECI) says that they are fake polls. [5] [6]. Venkat TL (talk) 14:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

@Venkat TL To be fair, they did not mention C-Voter specifically. Ok123l (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Who do you think they are talking about? This particular incident about CVoter was all over the news. Others are also doing the same. Venkat TL (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

One more Opinion poll. Should be added? by Republic TV-P-Marq.- Nizil (talk) 04:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

@Nizil Republic TV is deprecated source because of many instances of fabrication and fake news. Should not be added. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

BTP

BTP should be shown as third party not AAP because it has got more votes percentage than AAP Het666 (talk) 09:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Wrong. The results of 2022 have not been declared yet. Venkat TL (talk) 09:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Based upon last page on 2017 Gujarat Legislative Assembly Election only two party is shown AAP is not even shown in that list Het666 (talk) 09:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

This is not 2017 election article. This is 2022 article. AAP is among the top three parties in 2022 Gujarat election. See the section above for more. Venkat TL (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

So AAP shall not be considered as third party BTP has 2 MLAs in Gujarat election and has significant impact on Tribal areas of Gujarat so added and basis on municipal election results is irrelevant too Het666 (talk) 10:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 The article has excessive numbers of sources calling AAP top 3 parties in Gujarat. Find me one source that says BTP is in top three today. Venkat TL (talk) 10:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Firstly give your sources Het666 (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Also no sources are saying about is getting significant voting percentage Het666 (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

I think so many sources would also have said AAP will election too are election results declared And also during Punjab assembly election NDA alliance also not shown because it would get 5% or less votes Het666 (talk) 10:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

See the section #AAP above. Also read these references. [7] and [8] Venkat TL (talk) 11:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

The infobox is arranged based on the previous election results not on media reports/speculations or projections. If the media says AAP is the third biggest party it should be added to the section of opinion polls, not in infobox. TheWikiholic (talk) 12:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

@TheWikiholic Please point me to the rule that you are following. As far as I am aware Wikipedia articles are written on what Reliable sources say. Not speculations by Editors. Venkat TL (talk) 17:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

I never cited any rules here. I was talking about a common practice that has been followed and maintained by the community over the years. If you have any doubt you can verify that by checking the categories of different elections of the legislative assembly. An infobox is not a place to project the speculation of either editors or the media. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Clearly you must have misunderstood the practice. The only rule is to follow and publish what the reliable source say. Not what you believe. No media source is calling BTP as a contender to win the election. Not sure from where you are getting such hints even. Venkat TL (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Huh from this article it's just a Speculation and it has only references which has been made by Kejriwal ohimself how that can make third or second or single largest party ? Personal opinion of AAP is not considered nothing in that article is saying AAP is significant party in Gujarat election Het666 (talk) 11:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

And about municipal election results which don't have influence since it covers only Municipal Corporations Het666 (talk) 11:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

It is better that BTP which has two MLAs in Gujarat assembly shall be considered as party and mentioned in article Het666 (talk) 11:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Please provide reliable source that says BTP is a serious contender for winning this election. you have not provided such a source. Your opinions are not reliable source. I do not support adding it. Since there is no consensus Please do not edit war to add it without getting WP:CONSENSUS, Please check WP:ONUS and WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION, if you continue to edit war this, you will be reported for edit warring. Venkat TL (talk) 10:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Nor i have reverted or edited about AAP and admin also has said the same about you nor i have made any disruptive editing not i m engaged in any war Het666 (talk) 13:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Just quuoying satatement of AAP doesn't mean a reliable source and I m not giving opinion it's based on past result of Election and from other election pages last time the same is done on Punjab Election too where you have said the same about minimum 5% vote criteria for party in inbox Het666 (talk) 13:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Het666 (talk) 14:07, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Het666 (talk) 14:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

References

Het666, The second link you posted only mentions 3 party in Headline. AAP, Congress, BJP. There is no BTP in headline. Do you know why? --Venkat TL (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Second one is about AAP is not a third party three party doesn't mean third party btw Het666 (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Please indent your post. Here is the headline, अनवर, तारिक (14 October 2022). "गुजरात के ओपिनियन पोल में किस पार्टी को बहुमत? जानें- BJP, कांग्रेस और AAP का हाल". www.abplive.com (in Hindi).. Clearly AAP is mentioned in headline and no BTP, why ? Because BTP is not a serious contendor of winning Gujarat election. Or else they would have mentioned BTP also in the headline. --Venkat TL (talk) 14:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok but are mentioning three parties compulsory look 2022 Himachal Legislative Assembly Election Het666 (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Mentioning the major contenders of the election according to reliable media is important. even in Himachal AAP is considered contender by Media. See [9]. Venkat TL (talk) 17:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Jagmal Vala's remarks on Alcohol

AAP candidate has supported Alcohol in Gujarat therefor included because which is related to Alcohol issue. Het666 (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

What is the significance? is this party position? Most importantly you have added this 3 times and you have been reverted. It should be obvious to you that there is no consensus to add this and yet you keep edit warring to add this here? Venkat TL (talk) 10:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

I haven't get complaint about it and I have put that data because it is ralted to Alcohol issue Het666 (talk) 10:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 when you add something and it gets removed. It is a complaint. you need to stop adding it and get consensus on the talk page. Venkat TL (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

If this then Same also apply to Narendra Modi's ally too Het666 (talk) 10:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Issues section is related to problems about government, not opposition. Also there has already been consensus to add Narendra Modi's ally; check here. Ok123l (talk) 08:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 also you can't just remove something then not start a section on the talk page about, say no consensus and hope everybody forgets it. Ok123l (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

It's not opposition it's contrary Het666 (talk) 09:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 I have asked some questions to understand why you believe it is important for this article. you have not answered. I have read the reference and the content and I do not support adding it. Since there is no consensus Please do not edit war to add it without getting WP:CONSENSUS, Please check WP:ONUS and WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION, if you continue to edit war this, you will be reported for edit warring. Venkat TL (talk) 10:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Status Quo version of 11 October restored

WP:STATUSQUO version by Cosmo Sarjak is restored for now. I have Reverted back to last consensus version that was acceptable to all, before recent controversial edits that were introduced without discussion and WP:CONSENSUS. Please follow WP:DISPUTE RESOLUTION and only make controversial edits after gaining consensus. Same applies to content removals. Regarding the full protection, this is an ongoing event and full protection is unworkable because the article gets frozen with no updates. This is a WP:controversial article and 'any user' who refuse to follow the WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION and WP:CONSENSUS policies to push their edits without consensus would need to follow the rules or should be blocked for editing warring without consensus. --Venkat TL (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your restoration is somewhat welcomed since there is no consensus yet. But you seem to have reverted many other edits which were updated, rightly sourced and had no disputes from any editor, including you, friend. And since I don't have thousands of edits like other editors here, I can't correct them once again till next year. Request you to add back things which had no dispute, were rightly sourced & are irrefutable. Thanks FofS&E (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

FofS&E I had to pick a version from past that is not my own, and before the addition of controversial content. In the next few edits, I have already added back most of the uncontroversial edits. Some of the edits that are controversial or were sourced to unreliable source like WP:TOI have not been restored. They would need better sources and consensus. If you think I missed some relevant noncontroversial content in the revert, then please reply below in new thread and we can restore it back with consensus. --Venkat TL (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. I understand you had to pick a version from the past. Could you restore this one:- http://en.m.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=2022_Gujarat_Legislative_Assembly_election&oldid=1116103431 It was the version which was last edited by me and you had restored the article to this version which included my edits backed by strong sources which were already cited. Btw, WP:TOI is very reliable, they still have guts to be critical of the government and TOI is not a deprecated source like Twitter or YouTube.

Yes, you missed some minor, yet relevant and non-controversial content which is why I came here. The last edit of 14th October where you had restored my version had no disputable content which resulted in this consensus talk. To the best of my knowledge. Request you to edit article back to that version, of course after checking and if you feel I'm right here.

Thanks!

FofS&E (talk) 04:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

@FofS&E You may have your opinion on TOI, but please click and read WP:TOI. This is not up for debate that TOI is not reliable. Wikipedia community believes it is not reliable. You are free to read any newspaper you like, but you should not add it as a source on Wikipedia. Either find another more reliable source or dont add that content at all, if TOI is the only source. Venkat TL (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

I just read WP:TOI. The legend used is "!" which says it is neither generally reliable nor generally unreliable. i.e No Consensus. Anyways, I wasn't the one who cited that reliable source. Unemployment is 1.6% not 2.6%. Again, from the source which is cited and not added by me. FofS&E (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

AAP candidates need to be updated

AAP candidates need to be updated in 2022_Gujarat_Legislative_Assembly_election#Candidates. Source = [10] [11]

@Chennai Super Kings Lover, Mahesh Chhanga 78, and Dhruv edits:, please add. Venkat TL (talk) 11:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

done by @Mahesh Chhanga 78: --Venkat TL (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Campaign - Bhartiya Janata Party

i have just put data which is related to BJP campaign and in reference it is clearly said that it is for campaign Read Article carefully particularly first para Het666 (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Don't add content from Op-ed articles. References has to be from proper news articles, not someone's opinions. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

How a simple phrase can Op-ed ?? It's not someone's opinion. Similarly other party has also did this does that also mean OP-ed. Its look like you misinterpreted between a phrase and Opinion Simply it just a phrase which reflects thier campaign not their opinion Het666 (talk) 16:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 It's not a reliable source. The article clearly states its an Opinion piece and not a news article. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

How can you call unreliable, where Wikipedia is allowing . Read Opinion piece which clearly states that when it is given by an author, it's is used as phrase in a party's campaign for election Het666 (talk) 16:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Given line is phrase used for campaigning not giving any opinion Het666 (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

You can't call any reference unreliable where it doesn't match your OPINION Het666 (talk) 16:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 The whole article is the opinion of the author, as it is clearly tagged as 'Opinion' on the website. If it is the campaign slogan, you shouldn't find it hard to get a better source. If you can't find it, don't add it. Wikipedia articles are made on the basis of WP:V and WP:RS. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes it's a neutral source you can't deny it but it's a consensus matter therefor not reverted Het666 (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Employment subsection

Unreliable primary sources are being used in the ‎Unemployment section without any attribution, to paint a rosy picture. The entire section needs to be re-written with better sources to represent ground realities. Venkat TL (talk) 07:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 answer here. Ok123l (talk) 09:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

I think data should be from CMIE better source and they are showing 1.6% so it's a rosy picture or not I don't know, any statements by political parties should not be considered Het666 (talk) 10:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

All the issues here mentioned political parties statements and allegations so understand reliability about that also Het666 (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

I think AAP leader's statement on BJP leader is not an issue instead it shall be in incident section also same with attack on AAP leader Het666 (talk) 10:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

I have slightly re-written the sub-section and removed content from unreliable and questionable sources. Only content from reliable sources has been included. Dhruv edits (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC) CMIE is a reliable source

Dear Dhruv, what is your objection to PLFS based info? What consensus is needed is needed for the fact that Gujarat is a prosperous state with low unemployment numbers, as proved by PLFS survey? Reva1804 (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

@Reva1804 I haven't raised any objection on the pdf because I haven't gone through it yet. The objection, as clearly explained to you on your talk page and edit summaries multiple times, was that you have removed properly sourced information three times without any consensus and proper reasoning, making them disruptive edits, as well as engaging in an edit war. And I see you still haven't added back the sourced information that you removed without consensus. Dhruv edits (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Looks like you want to remove the undisputed fact that Gujarat has low unemployment rate by reporting me for edit war/disruptive edits. Instead of reporting, you can add the info you want to add, without removing the first two lines. Reva1804 (talk) 06:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

If rate of Unemployment is low in Gujarat so not a poll issue then why are adding it CMIE is a reliable source Viewers should get reliable information not a political parties statements Het666 (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 because CMIE is not a reliable source. Figures of Gujarat government budget and registered unemployment agencies are official reliable sources. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

So provide us that data otherwise Economy of Gujarat data shall be considered Het666 (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 It is already in the article. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

ok fine, And that's is showing 3.3% lowest amongst the other states/uts Het666 (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

@Ok123l Unemployment is steadily decreasing as per PLFS. Proof attached in ref

so many information is just allegations of parties not facts is added here then why decreasing unemployment can't be added , user:Dhruv edits is continuously making Wikipedia: Disruptive editing satatements by political parties just for their politics not in reality Het666 (talk) 11:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 PLFS info was added twice. I removed the redundant information. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

again facts ignored , i m asking User:Dhruv edits that why decreasing unemployment shall not be added here parties are just making issue without knowing facts Het666 (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

facts of a party shall not be considered Het666 (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 because 'decreasing unemployment' is not a fact. It is based on a survey, not official figures. Other citations are from Wikipedia:Reliable sources and have official figures, not based on some survey. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

User:Reva1804 wants to add "steadily decreasing unemployment" just after "steadily increasing unemployment". These contradict pretty bad and one needs to be removed. Since Business standard is a secondary source, it is probably preferred. Ok123l (talk) 12:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

See this [12] opposition is meant for opposing incumbent government whether BJP AAP or Congress Het666 (talk) 12:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

See CMIE sources there you will get lowest unemployment rate User:Ok123l Het666 (talk) 12:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC) @Dhruv edits Why are you dismissing PLFS survey as controversial? Do you have any proof stating Gujarat –has higher unemployment than national average? If not, don't remove it

Controversial PLFS survey from primary source

@Reva1804 Achieve consensus on talk page before adding PLFS data. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

What is controversial in PLFS survey? Why can't you accept the fact that Gujarat is a prosperous state with low unemployment figures? Reva1804 (talk) 12:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Did you achieve any consensus for removing PLFS data? Who told you it is controversial? It is clear you are biased towards AAP Reva1804 (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@WP:RS clearly state otherwise. Adding surveys from primary sources do not change what reliable sources say. Unless you have information from reliable sources that are secondary and not based on surveys, this should not be added. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Figures of Indian government's Ministry of Statistics are official reliable sources. Reva1804 (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

It is controversial because ot is from Primary source, not unbiased secondary source. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

You are the only one who is mentioning AAP everytime there has been a discussion regarding unemployment rates. No one else is doing that. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

You are the one trying to erase from this page the undisputed fact that Gujarat has one of the lowest unemployment rates. Clearly you are jealous of the state Reva1804 (talk) 12:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Figures of Indian government's Ministry of Statistics are official reliable sources. Reva1804 (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

According to you, is Indian Express a unbiased secondary source? I have IE report stating that Gujarat has lower than national average unemployment Reva1804 (talk) 12:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@Reva1804 The first page of the pdf clearly states that the unemployment rates are based on estimates. There is nothing official or reliable about estimates. If the IE report is just reporting PLFS data then it is not secondary source. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

All unemployment statistics are based on estimates, even the ones that you have added to prove high unemployment. So don't try to divert the topic Reva1804 (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

There is nothing official or reliable about Employment Exchange data also, if we go by your logic. There cannot be a fixed number of unemployed, everything is based on estimates. If you remove IE article data, then I will remove others as they are also as reliable as PLFS Reva1804 (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

The figures quoted by Employment exchange are not exact, as it doesn't capture all unemployed persons. Should we remove it too? Why can't you digest the fact that Gujarat has very low unemployment? Reva1804 (talk) 13:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

see this page Economy of Gujarat unemployment is lowest in Gujarat and its fact not AAP's false claim Het666 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Dhruv edits give reliable source which say Gujarat has higher unemployment Het666 (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

He won't give, he and Ok123l are clearly jealous of Gujarat's low unemployment numbers as compared to other states, hence they are making silly excuses to erase the information Reva1804 (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Or we shall refer the information in Economy of Gujarat Het666 (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

First of all, I'd never removed the part saying Gujarat has lower unemployment than national average. Second, please do not personally attack anyone as you have done repeatedly. Third, PLFS is a primary source, secondary sources are preferred on Wikipedia. Fourth, Reva1804, you have broken WP:3RR and reverted without consensus. Bishonen, I request your intervention. Ok123l (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Bishonen, two accounts (Dhruv and Ok123l) are reverting my edits which are based on official Govt. of India statistics, to portray wrong info about unemployment in Gujarat. I have already discussed on talk page for consensus

[13] is reliable source than other , if you have reason that PLFS is not reliable then give

Personal shall be avoided Het666 (talk) 15:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Article size

Article is too large and overly detailed now. Please summarize and split where necessary. Long quotes and irrelevant details should be scrapped. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

@Nizil Shah on what basis are you calling it large? I think the article is still start class and lacks a lot of major information. I suggest you to check, 2017 United Kingdom general election to see how a decent election article looks like. Venkat TL (talk) 08:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

According to WP:TOOBIG, it is well above 88kb in size and will expand further with results and all. There is plenty of irrelevant and trivial details. That is why I suggested trimming for better readability and content coverage. We should also consider that each and every news item do not belong here. -Nizil (talk) 14:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

@Nizil Shah only prose text is counted in that calculation. Please read again. you are counting tables and everything including wiki markup. remove that and then count again, Venkat TL (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

OK. Still a lot need trimming. I have done some trimming like repeat of manifesto etc. Full party names, titles, obvious words, etc can be trimmed for better readability and summary. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 15:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

@Nizil Shah I have a script installed. it calculated. "Prose size (text only) "readable prose size": 14 kB (2389 words)". So this is not large by any stretch of imagination. Please take inspiration from UK article and help to expand this substantially using non biased sources. Venkat TL (talk) 15:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

How can you compare an another countries' general elections with state's legislative election !! In this article major information is based on a political parties allegations on another party whether it's BJP AAP or INC yes his concern is right but size is ok Het666 (talk) 10:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Candidate lists

Currently at least 8 parties are contesting the election. Will we list candidates of all of these parties? Or only three parties; BJP/INC/AAP? If we add of all 8 parties, the table will be too large and unmanageable. Is there any other election page having candidate lists? So we can take a cue from it.- Nizil (talk) 06:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

@Nizil Shah look at Punjab, Only those parties that are covered by Reliable Media as a major contender for winning the election are being listed in the infobox and the candidate list. currently it is only 3. Many parties and independents will contest but their members will only be listed in the result section after they win the election. Other party candidates and independents can be listed in the individual constituency articles, in the 2022 table. Venkat TL (talk) 08:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Got it. Only AAP/INC/BJP here.-Nizil (talk) 11:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

@Nizil Shah yes, that is the consensus currently, you can find the consensus discussion here on #Last revert AAP in infobox Venkat TL (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

In the 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election AAP candidates are listed on the page, while in 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly election NDA candidates are not listed, In the UP AAP was not main contender compare to NDA in Punjab. Mahesh Chhanga 78 (talk) 09:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mahesh Chhanga 78 We should not be discussing other pages and election here, but to answer your question, NDA was not a contender for winning Punjab. No reliable media covered NDA as having a chance to win Punjab election. If you have read any such reliable media source please share on the Punjab talk page and ping me from there. UP was discussed here Venkat TL (talk) 10:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mahesh Chhanga 78 see my reply to Nizil above. Venkat TL (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Table rearranging

I have made this edit just to reduce width of table that viewers will get easier Het666 (talk) 04:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666: Table rearranged is easier to view but difficult to shorten data , While ascending/descending numbers of voters and/or margin after results. Mahesh Chhanga 78 (talk) 05:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 You have edited against the talk page consensus for this table. Please read the discussion above. I support reverting Het666 edits as they have made the table harder to read as query data is in rows and not in columns as is standard in Wikipedia tables. Venkat TL (talk) 06:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

see other election pages where same has been done even during Punjab Election i have done the same but no one douted Het666 (talk) 07:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mahesh Chhanga 78 @Venkat TL I am reverting these edits for now since talk page consensus was reached for both Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat at Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election#Candidate table District vs sorting and Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election#Candidate table. @Het666 Please achieve consensus for these edits on the talk page before redoing these edits. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Consensus was based on sorting so no problem in this format too Het666 (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

In my edit Table is sortable and each constituency in right order I don't know why it reverted what about Het666 (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

See other election pages where same format used and it is most suitable where there are more than one party Wikipedia:CCC Het666 (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

In your table Format district column make table with more width Het666 (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 A change of tabular format was agreed from Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh elections onwards. The old format of candidates table doesn't allow sorting function, rendering a very useful part of the table futile. Under this new format, sorting function can be used on all columns. More width in this new format is not a problem at all. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 November 2022

Schedule of Gujarat State Assembly Election 2022

The Gujarat State Assembly Election 2022 will be conducted in two phases i.e December 1, 2022 & December 5, 2022 and the counting will be done on December 8, 2022 115.247.198.50 (talk) 07:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Schedule has been added. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Latest revert

Hey User: Dhruv edits i m not edit warring it's on your side and information is not about government process it is related to election and it is bjp agenda Het666 (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Until BJP declares it as election agenda by adding it to their manifesto, it should not be part of the election article. As of yet it is just one of many committees in the government. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Look at references it's clearly saying it's related to election if word manifesto is inappropriate then it's may be removed and also agenda Het666 (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

[14] [15]see references Het666 (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Again don't doWikipedia:Lamest edit wars Het666 (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Your reference clearly says that Union minister has said that UCC has nothing to do with upcoming elections, exactly the point I have made. Unless and until it clearly becomes election issue, ot should not be added. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:45, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

hey don't misinterprete the words Gujarat government has decided ahead of elections and other party have reacted by saying why ruling party is not implementing in whole india Het666 (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666. I have not misinterpreted any words. It has been clearly mentioned in the citation by BJP Union Minister that it is not a election issue. Until it becomes one, it will not be added. This is your last warning regarding WP:EDITWARRING . If you revert edits while talk page discussion is going on, you will be reported and blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Hey Wikipedia:Edit warring applies to you and by reverting proper information is violation of any Wikipedia rule and it's you are doing at this time not me Het666 (talk) 08:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

and about union cabinet minister reference, opposition parties considering as poll matter See other references where Arvind Kejriwal and Congress party saying this Het666 (talk) 09:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Information on wikipedia can be added only when there is consensus for it. Unless consensus has been reached on talk page for adding it, it will not be added. Your attempts to revert back to your preferred version (which doesn't have consensus) is edit warring. Kindly take your time and read WP:EDIT WARRING. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Also adding 2 paragraphs and 7 refs for something that has very little to do with elections as of yet is clearly undue weight. I will try to summarise it in one sentence. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

again I'm saying I'm not edit warring it's you who is editing a well sourced proper information and without Wikipedia: Consensus information shall not be removed them Het666 (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

hey Wikipedia is not your own remember there are editors who are making good edits too Het666 (talk) 09:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Information is properly sourced and related too elections not personal opinions which you infact giving and this page is not having Wikipedia:Consensus required btw Het666 (talk) 09:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

I have given proper explanation therefor information shall be added Het666 (talk) 09:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Every sourced information is not added to articles. Kindly read WP:UNDUE and WP:CONSENSUS. I have also added one sentence regarding UCC. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Don't give false arguments ofcourse , information i have put is Related to article read Wikipedia:Consensus required and if your disagree doesn't mean information is invalid also I have given full explanation Het666 (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 according to WP:ONUS you cannot revert the content back if anyone reverts it before consensus, so please don't. As for this content dispute I agree with Dhruv edits, the formation of a committee in Gujarat government is very minimally related to the Gujarat election. It's not officially part of the BJP manifesto and therefore should not be added. Please do not edit war. Ok123l (talk) 12:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

It's already been removed without consensus, however many political parties has reacted on BJP UCC committee User:Dhrub edits has himself added that into article he is removing information without Wikipedia:Consensus Het666 (talk) 13:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Traditionally things do not require a talk page discussion when it's just 1-2 sentences. When there's someone challenging it, that's when you need one. Even if political parties react, it doesn't change the fact that its just the formation of a committee. Ok123l (talk) 17:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

• Support* I support addition of UCC Safoora Ham Burrger (talk) 17:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC) — Safoora Ham Burrger (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. (WP:SOCKSTRIKE, previous SPA comment is not from me — DaxServer (t · m · c) 22:44, 7 November 2022 (UTC))

Het666, please do not falsely accuse others of vandalism or disruptive without proof that amounts to a personal attack. Ok123l (talk) 14:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

He has reverted edit done by me though I have given proper explanation he reverts again and again and also giving warring notice on my page is this Het666 (talk) 15:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666: unless it is officially mentioned in the election manifesto by the political party...we cannot mention here in this election article. There are no sources that prove that it is a part of election manifesto officially now in this elections. 456legend(talk) 13:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

India TV - Matrize Opinion poll for Gujarat

India TV - Matrize Opinion poll for Gujarat may be added in 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election#Opinion polls

[16] Safoora Ham Burrger (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

According to the opinion poll, BJP may win a huge majority of 119 seats in the 182-member Gujarat assembly, while Congress may win 59 seats and Aam Aadmi Party may win only three seats. In 2017 assembly elections, BJP had won 99 seats, Congress had won 81 seats and ‘others’ had won two seats. Safoora Ham Burrger (talk) 05:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Added. Ok123l (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

• WP:SOCKSTRIKE — DaxServer (t · m · c) 22:41, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Congress candidates

@Ok123l I have fixed the table structure. Just remove the Congress candidates appearing under AAP column and add them to Congress column. You can also add AAP's ninth and tenth list of candidates. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

I can't quite figure out how to remove Congress candidates appearing under AAP column and adding them to Congress column without the table breaking, but I will add AAP's ninth and tenth list. Ok123l (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 November 2022

Please add new survey published by ABP Cvoter yesterday along with old one. 105.245.104.203 (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Added. Ok123l (talk) 08:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Election issues

• [17]
• [18] [19]
• [20]
• [21]

Above references can help in expanding issues section.-Nizil (talk) 06:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

@Nizil Shah. Based on these refs, I think we can add Morbi bridge accident and Bilkis Bano case. Maybe expand agriculture as well. Dhruv edits (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

CPI(ML) Liberation

CPI(ML) Liberation will field 5 candidates in Gujarat election (according to CPI(ML)L General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya)[22]. Please add it in others section. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706  Not done: There are many political parties that contest elections. Information on every political party cannot be added, specially those that are not a major party for the election. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 November 2022

Boss6040 (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

https://telanganatoday.com/gujarat-polls-aaps-cm-candidate-isudan-gadhvi-to-contest-from-khambhalia-seat Add ishudan gadhavi photo

Add Ishudan gadhavi photo Boss6040 (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

 Not done for now: Please provide a photo with an acceptable license. We can't use copyrighted photographs taken from other websites. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Boss6040 (talk) 07:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Add The photo on isudan gadhavi Boss6040 (talk) 07:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

CPIM Candidates

CPIM has declared 9 candidates for Gujarat 2022 election. Please include it in parties and alliance section. (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=691295512362248&set=a.544818833676584) CPIM is not a main contender in this election but if number of candidates of BTP and AIMIM is given, then the number of candidates of CPIM (a national party) should also be given.XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

added Ok123l (talk) 12:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 November 2022

Communist Party of India (Marxist) also contesting on 9 Seats in Gujarat assembly elections. Kindly add that in the Wikipedia. PrasenjiSpeaks (talk) 10:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

added Ok123l (talk) 12:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 November 2022

In the Opinion Poll Section, please add Times Now - ETG Research Opinion Poll WikiNav 14:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

In the Opinion Polls Section requesting the editors to add Opinion Polls Published by Times Now - ETG Research.

Times Now is one of Leading Media House and the opinion poll published by the Media House is currently missing in the section. I am attaching the relevant links of the Opinion Poll Coverage for your reference.

Link 1

Link 2

The Results of the Opinion Poll are:

Polling firm/Commissioner : Times Now - ETG Research

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

BJP: 125-130 , 45% Vote Share

INC: 29-33 , 21% Vote Share

AAP: 20-24, 29% Vote Share

Others: 1-3, 5% Vote Share WikiNav 07:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CovidBubble (talk • contribs)

BJP Manifesto

Manifesto

• $1 trillion Economy and FDI: We will make Gujarat a $1 trillion economy by maintaining its pole position in manufacturing, focusing on services and investing in human and institutional capacity-building for new-age industries. We will attract ₹5 lakh crore foreign investment and make Gujarat the Defence and Aviation Manufacturing Hub of India.

• Urban Infrastructure Beautification: We will spend ₹25,000 crore under the Gujarat Urban Development Mission to transform the urban landscape with a focus on decongesting the existing cities (Satellite Townships) and increasing ease of living (Riverfront, Recreational Parks, Urban Forests, Traffic Management Systems) for citizens.

• Olympics in Gujarat: We will launch Gujarat Olympics Mission and create world-class sports infrastructure with an aim to host the Olympic Games in 2036.

• Agri Infra: We will invest ₹10,000 crore under Gujarat Krishi Infrastructure Kosh to develop a holistic system of Khedut Mandis, modern APMCs, sorting and grading units, cold chains, warehouses, primary processing centres, etc.

• Irrigration Project: We will invest ₹25,000 crore to expand the existing irrigation network through projects such as Sujalam Sufalam, SAUNI, lift irrigation projects, micro irrigation, drip irrigation and other systems across Gujarat.

• Gaushala: We will ensure holistic care for livestock by strengthening Gaushalas (additional budget of ₹500 crore), setting up 1,000 additional Mobile Veterinary Units and ensuring complete vaccination and insurance.

• Sea Food Park, corridor and Fishing Infra:We will set up 2 Sea Food Parks (one each in South Gujarat and Saurashtra), build India’s first Blue Economy Industrial Corridor and strengthen fishing related infrastructure (jetties, cold supply chain and mechanisation of boats).

• Healthcare: We will double the annual cap under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (Ayushman Bharat) from ₹5 lakh to ₹10 lakh per family and ensure free-of-cost medical treatment.

• Diagnostic Scheme: We will launch the Mukhyamantri Free Diagnostic Scheme with a corpus of ₹110 crore to provide free-of-cost diagnostic services in all government health institutions and empanelled laboratories for EWS households.

• Medical Colleges: We will create a ₹10,000 crore Maharaja Shri Bhagvatsinhji Swasthya Kosh to set up 3 Civil Medicities, 2 AIIMS-grade institutions, and upgrade infrastructure at existing healthcare facilities (Hospitals, CHCs and PHCs).

• Building School of Excellence: We will convert 20,000 government schools into Schools of Excellence with a budget of ₹10,000 crore in the next 5 years.

• Upgrading School Infra: We will launch Keshavram Kashiram Shastri Higher Education Transformation Fund with a budget of ₹1,000 crore, to construct new government colleges and revamp the existing colleges and universities with state-of-the-art facilities.

• 20 lakh Jobs: We will provide 20 lakh employment opportunities to the youth of Gujarat in the next 5 years.

• 4 Industrial College: We will establish 4 Gujarat Institute of Technology (GIT) on the lines of IITs as Centres of Excellence in the areas of Green Energy, Semiconductors, FinTech, and Aerospace.

• PM Awas Yojna-House Allocation: We will ensure that every citizen in Gujarat has a pucca house and ensure 100% implementation of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.

• Family Card Yojana: We will launch a Family Card Yojana, which will enable every family to avail benefits of all State Government-run welfare schemes.

• Ration: We will provide 1 litre of edible oil four times a year and 1 kg subsidised chana per month at subsidised rates through the PDS system.

• Ration Home Delivery: We will initiate mobile delivery of ration across all 56 Tribal Sub Plan Talukas.

• Tribals Development: We will spend ₹1 lakh crore under the Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana 2.0 for the all-round socio-economic development of tribals.

• Religious Development: We will construct a Birsa Munda Adi Jati Samriddhi Corridor between Ambaji and Umergram to spur growth by connecting every tribal district’s headquarters with a 4-6 lane state highway, and by constructing a tribal cultural circuit to connect Pal Dadhvaav and the Statue of Unity to Shabari Dham.

• Building Medical Colleges: We will ensure state-of-the-art healthcare facilities in tribal areas by setting up 8 medical colleges, and 10 nursing/para-medical colleges.

• Set-up 8 GIDCs: We will set up 8 GIDCs in the tribal belt to generate employment opportunities for tribal youth.

• Edication: We will set up 25 Birsa Munda Gyan Shakti Residential Schools to provide the best residential schooling facilities to 75,000 meritorious students from the tribal community.

• Free Education: We will provide free-of-cost, quality education to all female students from KG to PG.

• Free E-scooters to Female: We will start Sharda Mehta Yojana to provide free two-wheelers (electric scooters) to meritorious college-going female students from financially weak households.

• Free Bus to Female: We will provide free bus travel to female senior citizens in the state.

• 1 lakh Government Jobs: We will create more than 1 lakh government jobs for women in the next 5 years.

• Shramik Credit Cards: We will introduce Shramik Credit Cards for labourers to provide them with collateral-free loans up to ₹2 lakh.

• ₹50000 to ranker: We will provide a one-time incentive grant of ₹50,000 for OBC/ST/SC/EWS students who get into a NIRF top-ranking institution in India or a top-ranking world institution for higher education.

• Uniform Civil Code: We will ensure the complete implementation of the Gujarat Uniform Civil Code Committee’s recommendation.

• Anti-Radicalisation Cell: We will create an Anti-Radicalisation Cell to identify and eliminate potential threats, and sleeper cells of the terrorist organisations and anti-India forces.

• Pubilc-Privat Damage Recovery Act: We will enact the Gujarat Recovery of Damages of Public and Private Properties Act to recover damages done to public and private properties by anti-social elements during riots, violent protests, unrest, etc.

• Police Modernization: We will spend over ₹1,000 crore on Police Force modernisation to strengthen the physical infrastructure, purchasing best-in-class weapons and equipment, and building India’s most robust IT infrastructure.

• Highways: We will develop the first-of-its-kind Parikrama Path of 3,000 km encircling the whole state with 4-6 lane roads/ highways by constructing a South Eastern Peripheral Highway and North Western Peripheral Highway.

• Corridors: We will develop Gujarat Link Corridors by completing the missing links and augmenting the existing highways through the East-West Corridor connecting Dahod with Porbandar and North-South Corridor connecting Palanpur to Valsad.

• Exressway: We will develop a Saurashtra Express Highway Grid to provide seamless connectivity between important economic hubs and national highways.

• Metro: We will ensure time-bound completion of Gandhinagar and Surat Metro, and kick-start work on Saurashtra (Rajkot) and Central Gujarat’s (Vadodara) first metro rail service.

• Dharmic Infrastructure: We will build a Devbhumi Dwarka Corridor to establish it as western India’s biggest spiritual centre, comprising of the "World’s tallest Shree Krishna statue", a 3D immersive Bhagwat Gita experience zone and a viewing gallery for the lost city of Dwarka.

• Renovate Temples: We will invest ₹1,000 crore to renovate, expand and promote temples, following the successful transformation model of Somnath, Ambaji and Pavagadh.

• Cultural: We will invest ₹2,500 crore to promote Gujarat’s culture at the national and international levels by building museums, centres for performing arts, Sardar Patel Bhawan, etc.

@Ok123l: , @Mahesh Chhanga 78:

Added Done. Mahesh Chhanga 78 (talk) 05:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Thakur in Feb 22 (1).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:06, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 November 2022

Add INC's CM candidate's photo in Infobox. Notdost (talk) 13:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

@Notdost  Done by Chennai Super Kings Lover. Dhruv edits (talk) 22:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

'Results by constituency' table

@Rohitsetthachok Please see discussion at Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election#Candidate table District vs sorting and Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election#Candidate table. The table for 'Results by constituency ' should be based on the new format, just like the candidates table here. The older tabular format doesn't provide proper sorting function, hence the change was needed. Dhruv edits (talk) 03:26, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Gujarat Election Results Update

#	Constituency	Candidate (2022)	Status	2022 Win/Lead	2017	Region
1	Abdasa	Jadeja Pradhyumansinh Mahipatsinh	Counting	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
2	Akota	Chaitanya Makarandbhai Desai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
3	Amraiwadi	Dr. Hasmukh Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
4	Amreli	Kaushik Kantibhai Vekariya	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
5	Anand	Yogesh R. Patel (bapji)	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
6	Anjar	Chhanga Trikam Bijal	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
7	Anklav	Amit Chavda	Results Out	INC	INC	Central
8	Ankleshwar	Ishwarsinh Thakorbhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
9	Asarwa	Darshna M. Vaghela	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
10	Balasinor	Mansinh Kohyabhai Chauhan	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
11	Bapunagar	Dineshsinh Rajendrasinh Kushwaha	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
12	Bardoli	Ishvarbhai Alias Anilbhai Ramanbhai Parmar	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
13	Bayad	Dhavalsinh Narendrasinh Zala	Results Out	IND	INC	North
14	Becharaji	Thakor Sukhaji Somaji	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
15	Bharuch	Rameshbhai Narandas Mistry	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
16	Bhavnagar East	Sejalben Rajivkumar Pandya	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
17	Bhavnagar Rural	Parshottambhai O. Solanki	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
18	Bhavnagar West	Jitendrabhai Savajibhai Vaghani	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
19	Bhiloda	P.c.baranda	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
20	Bhuj	Keshubhai Shivdas Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
21	Borsad	Solanki Ramanbhai Bhikhabhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
22	Botad	Makwana Umeshbhai Naranbhai	Counting	AAP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
23	Chanasma	Dilipkumar Virajibhai Thakor	Counting	BJP	BJP	North
24	Chhota Udaipur	Rajendrasinh Mohansinh Rathva	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
25	Choryasi	Sandip Desai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
26	Chotila	Chauhan Shamajibhai Bhimajibhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
27	Dabhoi	Shaileshbhai Kanaiyalal Mehta (shailesh Sotta)	Counting	BJP	BJP	Central
28	Dahegam	Chauhan Balrajsinh Kalyansinh	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
29	Dahod	Kanaiyalal Bachubha Kishori	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
30	Dangs	Vijaybhai Rameshbhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	INC	South
31	Danilimda	Shailesh Manubhai Parmar	Results Out	INC	INC	Central
32	Danta	Kantibhai Kalabhai Kharadi	Results Out	INC	INC	North
33	Dariapur	Kaushikbhai Sukhlal Jain (kaushik Jain)	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
34	Dasada	P.k.parmar	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
35	Daskroi	Babubhai Jamnadas Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
36	Dediapada	Chaitarbhai Damjibhai Vasava	Results Out	AAP	BTP	South
37	Deesa	Pravinkumar Gordhanji Mali	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
38	Deodar	Keshaji Shivaji Chauhan	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
39	Devgadhbaria	Khabad Bachubhai Maganbhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
40	Dhandhuka	Kalubhai Rupabhai Dabhi	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
41	Dhanera	Mavjibhai Maganbhai Desai	Results Out	IND	INC	North
42	Dharampur	Arvind Chhotubhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
43	Dhari	Kakadiya Jaysukhbhai Vallabhbhai (kakadiya J.v.)	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
44	Dholka	Kiritsinh Sardarsang Dabhi	Counting	BJP	BJP	Central
45	Dhoraji	Dr. Mahendrabhai Padalia	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
46	Dhrangadhra	Prakashbhai Parsotambhai Varmora	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
47	Dwarka	Pabubha Virambha Manek	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
48	Ellisbridge	Amit Shah	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
49	Fatepura	Katara Rameshbhai Bhurabhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
50	Gadhada	Mahant Shambhunath Tundiya	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
51	Gandevi	Nareshbhai Maganbhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
52	Gandhidham	Malti Kishor Maheshwari	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
53	Gandhinagar North	Ritaben Ketankumar Patel	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
54	Gandhinagar South	Alpesh Khodaji Thakor	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
55	Garbada	Mahendrabhai Bhabhor	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
56	Gariadhar	Sudhirbhai Vaghani (sudhir Vaghani)	Results Out	AAP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
57	Ghatlodia	Patel Bhupendrabhai Rajnikant	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
58	Godhra	C.k.raulji	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
59	Gondal	Geetaba Jayrajsinh Jadeja	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
60	Halol	Jaydrathsinhji Parmar	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
61	Himatnagar	Vinendrasinh Dilipsinh Zala	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
62	Idar	Ramanlal Ishwarlal Vora	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
63	Jalalpore	R.c.patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
64	Jamalpur - Khadia	Imran Khedawala	Results Out	INC	INC	Central
65	Jambusar	Devkishordasji Bhaktisvarupdasji Swami	Results Out	BJP	INC	South
66	Jamjodhpur	Ahir Hemantbhai Hardasbhai	Results Out	AAP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
67	Jamnagar North	Rivasinh Hardevsinh Solanki (rivaba Ravindrasinh Jadeja)	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
68	Jamnagar Rural	Patel Raghavjibhai Hansrajbhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
69	Jamnagar South	Akbari Divyeshbhai Ranchhodbhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
70	Jasdan	Kunvarjibhai Mohanbhai Bavaliya	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
71	Jetpur	Jayeshbhai Vitthalbhai Radadiya	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
72	Jetpur	Rathwa Jayantibhai Savjibhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
73	Jhagadia	Riteshkumar Ramanbhai Vasava	Results Out	BJP	BTP	South
74	Jhalod	Maheshbhai Somjibhai Bhuriya	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
75	Junagadh	Sanjay Sukhabhai Koradia	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
76	Kadi	Karsanbhai Punjabhai Solanki	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
77	Kalavad S.C.	Chavda Meghjibhai Amarabhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
78	Kalol	Thakor Laxmanji Punjaji (bakaji)	Counting	BJP	INC	North
79	Kalol	Fatesinh Vakhatsinh Chauhan	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
80	Kamrej	Praful Pansheriya	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
81	Kankrej	Amrutji Motiji Thakor	Counting	INC	BJP	North
82	Kapadvanj	Zala Rajeshkumar Maganbhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
83	Kaprada	Jitubhai Harjibhai Chaudhari	Results Out	BJP	INC	South
84	Karanj	Pravinbhai Manjibhai Ghoghari	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
85	Karjan	Akshaykumar Ishvarbhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
86	Katargam	Vinodbhai Amarshibhai Moradiya	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
87	Keshod	Devabhai Punjabhai Malam	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
88	Khambhalia	Ayar Mulubhai Hardasbhai Bera	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
89	Khambhat	Chiragkumar Arvindbhai Patel	Results Out	INC	BJP	Central
90	Khedbrahma	Dr.tushar Amarsinh Chaudhary	Counting	INC	INC	North
91	Kheralu	Sardarbhai Shamalbhai Chaudhary	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
92	Kodinar	Pradyuman Ganubhai Vaja	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
93	Kutiyana	Kandhalbhai Sarmanbhai Jadeja	Results Out	OTHERS	NCP	Kutch & Saurashtra
94	Lathi	Janakbhai Talaviya	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
95	Limbayat	Sangitaben Rajendra Patil	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
96	Limbdi	Kiritsinh Jitubha Rana	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
97	Limkheda	Bhabhor Shaileshbhai Sumanbhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
98	Lunawada	Gulabsinh Somsinh Chauhan	Results Out	INC	IND	Central
99	Mahesana	Patel Mukeshkumar D.	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
100	Mahudha	Sanjaysinh Vijaysinh Mahida	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
101	Mahuva	Gohil Shivabhai Jerambhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
102	Mahuva	Mohanbhai Dhanjibhai Dhodiya	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
103	Majura	Harsh Ramesh Sanghvi	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
104	Manavadar	Arvindbhai Jinabhai Ladani	Results Out	INC	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
105	Mandvi	Aniruddha Bhailal Dave	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
106	Mandvi	Kunvarjibhai Narsinhbhai Halpati	Results Out	BJP	INC	South
107	Mangrol	Kargatiya Bhagvanjibhai Lakhabhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
108	Mangrol	Ganpatsinh Vestabhai Vasava	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
109	Maninagar	Amul Bhatt	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
110	Manjalpur	Yogeshbhai Narandas Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
111	Mansa	Jayantibhai Somabhai Patel (j.s. Patel)	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
112	Matar	Kalpeshbhai Ashabhai Parmar	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
113	Mehmedabad	Arjunsinh Udesinh Chauhan	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
114	Modasa	Bhikhusinhji Chatursinhji Parmar	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
115	Morbi	Amrutiya Kantilal Shivlal	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
116	Morva Hadaf	Suthar Nimishaben Manharsinh	Results Out	BJP	IND	Central
117	Nadiad	Desai Pankajbhai Vinubhai (gotiyo)	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
118	Nandod	Dr. Darshna Chandubhai Deshmukh(vasava)	Results Out	BJP	INC	South
119	Naranpura	Jitendrakumar Ramanlal Patel (jitu Bhagat)	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
120	Naroda	Kukrani Payal Manojkumar	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
121	Navsari	Desai Rakesh Gunvantbhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
122	Nikol	Jagdish Vishwakarma	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
123	Nizar	Dr.jayrambhai Chemabhai Gamit	Results Out	BJP	INC	South
124	Olpad	Mukeshbhai Zinabhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
125	Padra	Chaitanyasinh Pratapsinh Zala	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
126	Palanpur	Aniket Girishbhai Thaker	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
127	Palitana	Bhikhabhai Ravajibhai Baraiya	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
128	Pardi	Kanubhai Mohanlal Desai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
129	Patan	Kiritkumar Chimanlal Patel	Results Out	INC	INC	North
130	Petlad	Kamleshbhai Rameshbhai Patel (master)	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
131	Porbandar	Arjunbhai Devabhai Modhwadia	Results Out	INC	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
132	Prantij	Gajendrasinh Udesinh Parmar	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
133	Radhanpur	Lavingji Muljiji Solanki	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
134	Rajkot East	Uday Kangad	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
135	Rajkot Rural	Bhanuben Manoharbhai Babariya	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
136	Rajkot South	Rameshbhai Virjibhai Tilala	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
137	Rajkot West	Dr. Darshita Shah	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
138	Rajula	Hirabhai Odhavjibhai Solanki	Counting	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
139	Raopura	Balkrushna Khanderao Shukla (balu Shukla)	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
140	Rapar	Virendrasinh Bahadursinh Jadeja	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
141	Sabarmati	Patel Harshadbhai Ranchhodbhai (harshad Patel)	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
142	Sanand	Kanubhai Karamshibhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
143	Sankheda	Abhesinh Motibhai Tadvi	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
144	Santrampur	Dr. Kuberbhai Mansukhbhai Dindor	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
145	Savarkundla	Kaswala Mahesh	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
146	Savli	Inamdar Ketanbhai Mahendrabhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
147	Sayajigunj	Keyur Narayandas Rokadia	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
148	Shehra	Ahir(bharvad) Jethabhai Ghelabhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
149	Sidhpur	Balvantsinh Chandansinh Rajput	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
150	Sojitra	Patel Vipulkumar Vinubhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
151	Somnath	Chudasama Vimalbhai Kanabhai	Results Out	INC	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
152	Surat East	Arvind Shantilal Rana	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
153	Surat North	Kantibhai Himmatbhai Balar	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
154	Surat West	Purnesh Modi	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
155	TALALA	Bhagabhai Dhanabhai Barad	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
156	Talaja	Gautambhai Gopabhai Chauhan	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
157	Tankara	Durlabhjibhai Harakhjibhai Dethariya	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
158	Thakkarbapa Nagar	Kanchanben Vinubhai Radadiya	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
159	Tharad	Shankarbhai Lagdhirbhai Chaudhary	Counting	BJP	BJP	North
160	Thasra	Yogendrasinh Parmar (bakabhai)	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
161	Udhna	Manubhai M. Patel (fogwa)	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
162	Umbergaon	Patkar Ramanlal Nanubhai	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
163	Umreth	Govindbhai Raijibhai Parmar	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
164	Una	Kalubhai Chanabhai Rathod	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
165	Unjha	Patel Kiritkumar Keshavlal (k K Patel)	Results Out	BJP	INC	North
166	Vadgam	Jignesh Mevani	Counting	INC	IND	North
167	Vadodara City	Manisha Vakil	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
168	Vaghodia	Dharmendrasinh Ranubha Vaghela (bapu)	Results Out	IND	BJP	Central
169	Vagra	Arunsinh Ajitsinh Rana	Counting	BJP	BJP	South
170	Valsad	Bharatbhai Kikubhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
171	Vansda	Anantkumar Hasmukhbhai Patel	Results Out	INC	INC	South
172	Varachha Road	Kishorbhai Kanani (kumar)	Results Out	BJP	BJP	South
173	Vatva	Babusinh Sarabhai Jadav	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
174	Vav	Thakor Geniben Nagaji	Results Out	INC	INC	North
175	Vejalpur	Amit Thaker	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Central
176	Vijapur	Dr. C. J. Chavda	Results Out	INC	BJP	North
177	Viramgam	Patel Hardik Bharatbhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	Central
178	Visavadar	Bhupendrabhai Gandubhai Bhayani	Results Out	AAP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra
179	Visnagar	Rushikesh Ganeshbhai Patel	Results Out	BJP	BJP	North
180	Vyara	Kokani Mohanbhai Dhedabhai	Results Out	BJP	INC	South
181	Wadhwan	Jagdishbhai Prabhubhai Makwana	Results Out	BJP	BJP	Kutch & Saurashtra
182	Wankaner	Jitendra Kantilal Somani	Results Out	BJP	INC	Kutch & Saurashtra

References

Election Result by constituency tabel Format

@Rohitsetthachok ,@User:Dhruv edits,@User:XYZ 250706 in the table "Resuls By Constituency" Party name with color is easy to readable and party name with background color looks messy.In the past election pages Party name with color is used for result table. I thought it should be applied. Mahesh Chhanga 78 (talk) 10:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)