This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2019) |
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (March 2019) |
Neomercantilism (also spelled neo-mercantilism) is a policy regime that encourages exports, discourages imports, controls capital movement, and centralizes currency decisions in the hands of a central government.[1] The objective of neomercantilist policies is to increase the level of foreign reserves held by the government, allowing more effective monetary policy and fiscal policy.
Background
editNeomercantilism is considered the oldest school of thought in international political economy (IPE).[2] It is rooted in mercantilism, a preindustrial doctrine, and gained ground during the Industrial Revolution.[2] It is also considered the IPE counterpart of realism in the sense that both hold that power is central in global relations.[2] This regime is also associated with corporatocracy particularly during the 1970s when both were treated as components of a functional system and policy goals.[3] In the United States, neomercantilism was embraced in the late 20th century amidst the move to buttress American industries from Japanese competition.[4] American thinkers who subscribed to the doctrine, however, include Alexander Hamilton, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States and the first U.S. secretary of the treasury.[2]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Hamilton, Leslie; Webster, Philip (2018). The International Business Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 429. ISBN 978-0-19-880429-1.
- ^ a b c d Cohn, Theodore H. (2016). Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice, Seventh Edition. Oxon: Routledge. pp. 55, 58. ISBN 9781138945654.
- ^ Gillingham, John; III, John R. Gillingham (2 June 2003). European Integration, 1950-2003: Superstate Or New Market Economy?. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-521-01262-1.
- ^ Clemens, Walter C. (2004). Dynamics of International Relations: Conflict and Mutual Gain in an Era of Global Interdependence, Second Edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 394. ISBN 0-7425-2821-9.
- O'Brien, Patrick Karl; Clesse, Armand, eds. (2002). Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846–1914 and the United States 1941–2001. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
- Mueller, Milton. “Regulation of platform market access by the United States and China: Neo‐mercantilism in digital services.” Wiley, Policy & Internet (2021).