This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2023) |
The
J/ψ
(J/psi) meson /ˈdʒeɪ ˈsaɪ ˈmiːzɒn/ is a subatomic particle, a flavor-neutral meson consisting of a charm quark and a charm antiquark. Mesons formed by a bound state of a charm quark and a charm anti-quark are generally known as "charmonium" or psions.[1] The
J/ψ
is the most common form of charmonium, due to its spin of 1 and its low rest mass. The
J/ψ
has a rest mass of 3.0969 GeV/c2, just above that of the
η
c (2.9836 GeV/c2), and a mean lifetime of 7.2×10−21 s. This lifetime was about a thousand times longer than expected.[2]
 | |
| Composition | c c |
|---|---|
| Statistics | bosonic |
| Family | meson |
| Interactions | strong, weak, electromagnetic, gravity |
| Symbol | J/ψ |
| Antiparticle | self |
| Discovered | SLAC: Burton Richter et al. (1974) BNL: Samuel Ting et al. (1974) |
| Types | 1 |
| Mass | 5.5208×10−27 kg 3.096916 GeV/c2 |
| Decay width | 92.9 keV |
| Decays into | 3 g or γ +2 g or γ |
| Electric charge | 0 e |
| Spin | 1 ħ |
| Isospin | 0 |
| Hypercharge | 0 |
| Parity | −1 |
| C parity | −1 |
Its discovery was made independently by two research groups, one at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, headed by Burton Richter, and one at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, headed by Samuel Ting of MIT. They discovered that they had found the same particle, and both announced their discoveries on 11 November 1974. The importance of this discovery[citation needed] is highlighted by the fact that the subsequent, rapid changes in high-energy physics at the time have become collectively known as the "November Revolution". Richter and Ting were awarded the 1976 Nobel Prize in Physics.
Background to discovery
editThe background to the discovery of the
J/ψ
was both theoretical and experimental. In the 1960s, the first quark models of elementary particle physics were proposed, which said that protons, neutrons, and all other baryons, and also all mesons, are made from fractionally charged particles, the "quarks", originally with three types or "flavors", called up, down, and strange. (Later the model was expanded to six quarks, adding the charm, top and bottom quarks.) Despite the ability of quark models to bring order to the "elementary particle zoo", they were considered something like mathematical fiction at the time, a simple artifact of deeper physical reasons.[3]
Starting in 1969, deep inelastic scattering experiments at SLAC revealed surprising experimental evidence for particles inside of protons. Whether these were quarks or something else was not known at first. Many experiments were needed to fully identify the properties of the sub-protonic components. To a first approximation, they indeed were a match for the previously described quarks.
On the theoretical front, gauge theories with broken symmetry became the first fully viable contenders for explaining the weak interaction after Gerardus 't Hooft discovered in 1971 how to calculate with them beyond tree level. The first experimental evidence for these electroweak unification theories was the discovery of the weak neutral current in 1973. Gauge theories with quarks became a viable contender for the strong interaction in 1973, when the concept of asymptotic freedom was identified.
However, a naive mixture of electroweak theory and the quark model led to calculations about known decay modes that contradicted observation: In particular, it predicted Z boson-mediated flavor-changing decays of a strange quark into a down quark, which were not observed. A 1970 idea of Sheldon Glashow, John Iliopoulos, and Luciano Maiani, known as the GIM mechanism, showed that the flavor-changing decays would be strongly suppressed if there were a fourth quark (now called the charm quark) that was a complementary counterpart to the strange quark. By summer 1974 this work had led to theoretical predictions of what a charm + anticharm meson would be like.
The group at Brookhaven,[a] were the first to discern a peak at 3.1 GeV in plots of production rates and named the particle the ψ meson. Ting named it the "J meson" in his simultaneous discovery.[4]
Decay modes
editHadronic decay modes of
J/ψ
are strongly suppressed because of the OZI rule. This effect strongly increases the lifetime of the particle and thereby gives it its very narrow decay width of just 93.2±2.1 keV. Because of this strong suppression, electromagnetic decays begin to compete with hadronic decays. This is why the
J/ψ
has a significant branching fraction to leptons.
The primary decay modes[5] are:
c c → 3 g |
64.1%±1.0% | |
c c → γ + 2 g |
8.8%±1.1% | |
c c → γ |
~25.5% | |
γ → hadrons |
13.5%±0.3% | |
γ → e+ + e− |
5.971%±0.032% | |
γ → μ+ + μ− |
5.961%±0.033% |
J/ψ
melting
edit
In a hot QCD medium, when the temperature is raised well beyond the Hagedorn temperature, the
J/ψ
and its excitations are expected to melt.[6] This is one of the predicted signals of the formation of the quark–gluon plasma. Heavy-ion experiments at CERN's Super Proton Synchrotron and at BNL's Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider have studied this phenomenon without a conclusive outcome as of 2009. This is due to the requirement that the disappearance of
J/ψ
mesons is evaluated with respect to the baseline provided by the total production of all charm quark-containing subatomic particles, and because it is widely expected that some
J/ψ
are produced and/or destroyed at time of QGP hadronization. Thus, there is uncertainty in the prevailing conditions at the initial collisions.
In fact, instead of suppression, enhanced production of
J/ψ
is expected[7] in heavy ion experiments at LHC where the quark-combinant production mechanism should be dominant given the large abundance of charm quarks in the QGP. Aside of
J/ψ
, charmed B mesons (
B
c), offer a signature that indicates that quarks move freely and bind at-will when combining to form hadrons.[8][9]
Name
editBecause of the nearly simultaneous discovery, the
J/ψ
is the only particle to have a two-letter name. Richter named it "SP", after the SPEAR accelerator used at SLAC; however, none of his coworkers liked that name. After consulting with Greek-born Leo Resvanis to see which Greek letters were still available, and rejecting "iota" because its name implies insignificance, Richter chose "psi" – a name which, as Gerson Goldhaber pointed out, contains the original name "SP", but in reverse order.[10] Coincidentally, later spark chamber pictures often resembled the psi shape. Ting assigned the name "J" to it, saying that the more stable particles, such as the W and Z bosons had Roman names, as opposed to classical particles, which had Greek names. He also cited the symbol for electromagnetic current which much of their previous work was concentrated on to be one of the reasons.[4]
Much of the scientific community considered it unjust to give one of the two discoverers priority, so most subsequent publications have referred to the particle as the "
J/ψ
".
The first excited state of the
J/ψ
was called the ψ′; it is now called the ψ(2S), indicating its quantum state. The next excited state was called the ψ″; it is now called ψ(3770), indicating mass in MeV/c2. Other vector charm–anticharm states are denoted similarly with ψ and the quantum state (if known) or the mass.[11] The "J" is not used, since Richter's group alone first found excited states.
The name charmonium is used for the
J/ψ
and other charm–anticharm bound states.[b] This is by analogy with positronium, which also consists of a particle and its antiparticle (an electron and positron in the case of positronium).
See also
editFootnotes
edit- ^ Glenn Everhart, Terry Rhoades, Min Chen, and Ulrich Becker, at Brookhaven first to discerned the 3.1 GeV peak in pair-production rates.
- ^
There are two different regimes of flavorless, neutral mesons: Low mass and high mass.
π0
, the lightest of all mesons), the
η
and
η′
,
ρ0
,
ω0
, and so-on. Whether high or low mass, since all of the flavorless mesons’ quantum numbers are zero they can only be distinguished by their masses. Generally their quark content is invisible, especially the low-mass flavorless mesons, not only because their very similar small masses can be easily confused, but also because the low-mass particles themselves do actually exist as mixtures. For example the lowest mass of all mesons is the neutral pion; it is approximately an equal mix of dd and uu matching quark–antiquark pairs.- cc = "charmonium" =
J/ψ
meson - bb = "bottomonium" =
ϒ0
- cc = "charmonium" =
References
edit- ^ Kapusta, J.; Müller, B.; Rafelski, J. (9 December 2003). Quark-Gluon Plasma: Theoretical Foundations: An Annotated Reprint Collection. p. 462. ISBN 9780444511102. Retrieved 25 September 2014 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Shared Physics prize for elementary particle" (Press release). The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. 18 October 1976. Retrieved 23 April 2012.
- ^ Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks. University of Chicago Press. pp. 114–125. ISBN 978-0-226-66799-7.
- ^ a b We discussed the name of the new particle for some time. Someone pointed out to me that the really exciting stable particles are designated by Roman characters – like the postulated W0, the intermediate vector boson, the Z0, etc. – whereas the “classical” particles have Greek designations like ρ, ω etc. This, combined with the fact that our work in the last decade had been concentrated on the electromagnetic current gave us the idea to call this particle the J particle. Samuel Ting, The Discovery of the J Particle Nobel prize lecture, 11. December 1976 [1]
- ^ Nakamura, K.; et al. (Particle Data Group) (2022). "J/ψ(1S)" (PDF). Particle Data Group. Journal of Physics G. 37 (7A). Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory: 075021. Bibcode:2010JPhG...37g5021N. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7A/075021.
- ^ Matsui, T.; Satz, H. (1986). "J/ψ suppression by quark–gluon plasma formation". Physics Letters B. 178 (4): 416–422. Bibcode:1986PhLB..178..416M. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91404-8. OSTI 1118865.
- ^ Thews, R. L.; Schroedter, M.; Rafelski, J. (2001). "Enhanced J/ψ production in deconfined quark matter". Physical Review C. 63 (5): 054905. arXiv:hep-ph/0007323. Bibcode:2001PhRvC..63e4905T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054905. S2CID 11932902.
- ^ Schroedter, M.; Thews, R.L.; Rafelski, J. (2000). "Bc-meson production in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions". Physical Review C. 62 (2): 024905. arXiv:hep-ph/0004041. Bibcode:2000PhRvC..62b4905S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62.024905. S2CID 119008673.
- ^ Fulcher, L.P.; Rafelski, J.; Thews, R.L. (1999). "Bc mesons as a signal of deconfinement". arXiv:hep-ph/9905201.
- ^ Zielinski, L (8 August 2006). "Physics Folklore". QuarkNet. Retrieved 13 April 2009.
- ^
Roos, M; Wohl, CG; (Particle Data Group) (2004). "Naming schemes for hadrons" (PDF). Retrieved 13 April 2009.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Sources
edit- Glashow, S. L.; Iliopoulos, J.; Maiani, L. (1970). "Weak Interactions with Lepton–Hadron Symmetry". Physical Review D. 2 (7): 1285–1292. Bibcode:1970PhRvD...2.1285G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1285.
- Aubert, J.; et al. (1974). "Experimental Observation of a Heavy Particle J". Physical Review Letters. 33 (23): 1404–1406. Bibcode:1974PhRvL..33.1404A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1404.
- Augustin, J.; et al. (1974). "Discovery of a Narrow Resonance in e+e− Annihilation". Physical Review Letters. 33 (23): 1406–1408. Bibcode:1974PhRvL..33.1406A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1406.
- Bobra, M. (2005). "Logbook: J/ψ particle". Symmetry Magazine. 2 (7): 34.
- Yao, W.-M.; et al. (Particle Data Group) (2006). "Review of Particle Physics: Naming Scheme for Hadrons" (PDF). Journal of Physics G. 33 (1): 108. arXiv:astro-ph/0601168. Bibcode:2006JPhG...33....1Y. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001.