Figure of the Earth

In geodesy, the figure of the Earth is the size and shape used to model planet Earth. The kind of figure depends on application, including the precision needed for the model. A spherical Earth is a well-known historical approximation that is satisfactory for geography, astronomy and many other purposes. Several models with greater accuracy (including ellipsoid) have been developed so that coordinate systems can serve the precise needs of navigation, surveying, cadastre, land use, and various other concerns.

Motivation

Earth's topographic surface is apparent with its variety of land forms and water areas. This topographic surface is generally the concern of topographers, hydrographers, and geophysicists. While it is the surface on which Earth measurements are made, mathematically modeling it while taking the irregularities into account would be extremely complicated.

The Pythagorean concept of a spherical Earth offers a simple surface that is easy to deal with mathematically. Many astronomical and navigational computations use a sphere to model the Earth as a close approximation. However, a more accurate figure is needed for measuring distances and areas on the scale beyond the purely local. Better approximations can be made by modeling the entire surface as an oblate spheroid, using spherical harmonics to approximate the geoid, or modeling a region with a best-fit reference ellipsoid.

For surveys of small areas, a planar (flat) model of Earth's surface suffices because the local topography overwhelms the curvature. Plane-table surveys are made for relatively small areas without considering the size and shape of the entire Earth. A survey of a city, for example, might be conducted this way.

Topographic view of Earth relative to Earth's center (instead of to mean sea level, as in common topographic maps)

By the late 1600s, serious effort was devoted to modeling the Earth as an ellipsoid, beginning with French astronomer Jean Picard's measurement of a degree of arc along the Paris meridian. Improved maps and better measurement of distances and areas of national territories motivated these early attempts. Surveying instrumentation and techniques improved over the ensuing centuries. Models for the figure of the Earth improved in step.

In the mid- to late 20th century, research across the geosciences contributed to drastic improvements in the accuracy of the figure of the Earth. The primary utility of this improved accuracy was to provide geographical and gravitational data for the inertial guidance systems of ballistic missiles. This funding also drove the expansion of geoscientific disciplines, fostering the creation and growth of various geoscience departments at many universities.^[1] These developments benefited many civilian pursuits as well, such as weather and communication satellite control and GPS location-finding, which would be impossible without highly accurate models for the figure of the Earth.

Models

The models for the figure of the Earth vary in the way they are used, in their complexity, and in the accuracy with which they represent the size and shape of the Earth.

Sphere

A view across a 20-km-wide bay in the coast of Spain. The curvature of the Earth is evident in the horizon across the image, and the bases of the buildings on the far shore are below that horizon and hidden by the sea.

The simplest model for the shape of the entire Earth is a sphere. The Earth's radius is the distance from Earth's center to its surface, about 6,371 km (3,959 mi). While "radius" normally is a characteristic of perfect spheres, the Earth deviates from spherical by only a third of a percent, sufficiently close to treat it as a sphere in many contexts and justifying the term "the radius of the Earth".

The concept of a spherical Earth dates back to around the 6th century BC,^[2] but remained a matter of philosophical speculation until the 3rd century BC. The first scientific estimation of the radius of the Earth was given by Eratosthenes about 240 BC, with estimates of the accuracy of Eratosthenes's measurement ranging from −1% to 15%.

The Earth is only approximately spherical, so no single value serves as its natural radius. Distances from points on the surface to the center range from 6,353 km (3,948 mi) to 6,384 km (3,967 mi). Several different ways of modeling the Earth as a sphere each yield a mean radius of 6,371 km (3,959 mi). Regardless of the model, any radius falls between the polar minimum of about 6,357 km (3,950 mi) and the equatorial maximum of about 6,378 km (3,963 mi). The difference 21 km (13 mi) correspond to the polar radius being approximately 0.3% shorter than the equatorial radius.

Ellipsoid of revolution

An oblate spheroid, highly exaggerated relative to the actual Earth

A scale diagram of the oblateness of the 2003 IERS reference ellipsoid, with north at the top. The outer edge of the dark blue line is an ellipse with the same eccentricity as that of Earth. For comparison, the light blue circle within has a diameter equal to the ellipse's minor axis. The red curve represents the Karman line 100 km (62 mi) above sea level, while the yellow band denotes the altitude range of the ISS in low Earth orbit.

As theorized by Isaac Newton and Christiaan Huygens,^[3]^: 4 the Earth is flattened at the poles and bulged at the equator. Thus, geodesy represents the figure of the Earth as an oblate spheroid. The oblate spheroid, or oblate ellipsoid, is an ellipsoid of revolution obtained by rotating an ellipse about its shorter axis. It is the regular geometric shape that most nearly approximates the shape of the Earth. A spheroid describing the figure of the Earth or other celestial body is called a reference ellipsoid. The reference ellipsoid for Earth is called an Earth ellipsoid.

An ellipsoid of revolution is uniquely defined by two quantities. Several conventions for expressing the two quantities are used in geodesy, but they are all equivalent to and convertible with each other:

Equatorial radius $a$ (called semimajor axis), and polar radius $b$ (called semiminor axis);
$a$ and eccentricity $e$ ;
$a$ and flattening $f$ .

Eccentricity and flattening are different ways of expressing how squashed the ellipsoid is. When flattening appears as one of the defining quantities in geodesy, generally it is expressed by its reciprocal. For example, in the WGS 84 spheroid used by today's GPS systems, the reciprocal of the flattening $1/f$ is set to be exactly 298.257223563.

The difference between a sphere and a reference ellipsoid for Earth is small, only about one part in 300. Historically, flattening was computed from grade measurements. Nowadays, geodetic networks and satellite geodesy are used. In practice, many reference ellipsoids have been developed over the centuries from different surveys. The flattening value varies slightly from one reference ellipsoid to another, reflecting local conditions and whether the reference ellipsoid is intended to model the entire Earth or only some portion of it.

A sphere has a single radius of curvature, which is simply the radius of the sphere. More complex surfaces have radii of curvature that vary over the surface. The radius of curvature describes the radius of the sphere that best approximates the surface at that point. Oblate ellipsoids have a constant radius of curvature east to west along parallels, if a graticule is drawn on the surface, but varying curvature in any other direction. For an oblate ellipsoid, the polar radius of curvature $r_{p}$ is larger than the equatorial

r_{p}={\frac {a^{2}}{b}},

because the pole is flattened: the flatter the surface, the larger the sphere must be to approximate it. Conversely, the ellipsoid's north–south radius of curvature at the equator $r_{e}$ is smaller than the polar

r_{e}={\frac {b^{2}}{a}}

where $a$ is the distance from the center of the ellipsoid to the equator (semi-major axis), and $b$ is the distance from the center to the pole. (semi-minor axis)

Non-spheroidal deviations

Triaxiality (equatorial eccentricity)

The possibility that the Earth's equator is better characterized as an ellipse rather than a circle and therefore that the ellipsoid is triaxial has been a matter of scientific inquiry for many years.^[4]^[5] Modern technological developments have furnished new and rapid methods for data collection and, since the launch of Sputnik 1, orbital data have been used to investigate the theory of ellipticity.^[3] More recent results indicate a 70 m difference between the two equatorial major and minor axes of inertia, with the larger semidiameter pointing to 15° W longitude (and also 180-degree away).^[6]^[7]

Egg or pear shape

Following work by Picard, Italian polymath Giovanni Domenico Cassini found that the length of a degree was apparently shorter north of Paris than to the south, implying the Earth to be egg-shaped.^[3]^: 4 In 1498, Christopher Columbus dubiously suggested that the Earth was pear-shaped based on his disparate mobile readings of the angle of the North Star, which he incorrectly interpreted as having varying diurnal motion.^[8]

The theory of a slightly pear-shaped Earth arose when data was received from the U.S.'s artificial satellite Vanguard 1 in 1958. It was found to vary in its long periodic orbit, with the Southern Hemisphere exhibiting higher gravitational attraction than the Northern Hemisphere. This indicated a flattening at the South Pole and a bulge of the same degree at the North Pole, with the sea level increased about 9 m (30 ft) at the latter.^[9]^[10]^[3]^: 9 This theory implies the northern middle latitudes to be slightly flattened and the southern middle latitudes correspondingly bulged.^[3]^: 9 Potential factors involved in this aberration include tides and subcrustal motion (e.g. plate tectonics).^[9]^[10]

John A. O'Keefe and co-authors are credited with the discovery that the Earth had a significant third degree zonal spherical harmonic in its gravitational field using Vanguard 1 satellite data.^[11] Based on further satellite geodesy data, Desmond King-Hele refined the estimate to a 45 m (148 ft) difference between north and south polar radii, owing to a 19 m (62 ft) "stem" rising in the North Pole and a 26 m (85 ft) depression in the South Pole.^[12]^[13] The polar asymmetry is about a thousand times smaller than the Earth's flattening and even smaller than its geoidal undulation in some regions.^[14]

Geoid

Map of the undulation of the geoid in meters (based on the EGM96 gravity model and the WGS84 reference ellipsoid).

Modern geodesy tends to retain the ellipsoid of revolution as a reference ellipsoid and treat triaxiality and pear shape as a part of the geoid figure: they are represented by the spherical harmonic coefficients $C_{22},S_{22}$ and $C_{30}$ , respectively, corresponding to degree and order numbers 2.2 for the triaxiality and 3.0 for the pear shape.

It was stated earlier that measurements are made on the apparent or topographic surface of the Earth and it has just been explained that computations are performed on an ellipsoid. One other surface is involved in geodetic measurement: the geoid. In geodetic surveying, the computation of the geodetic coordinates of points is commonly performed on a reference ellipsoid closely approximating the size and shape of the Earth in the area of the survey. The actual measurements made on the surface of the Earth with certain instruments are however referred to the geoid. The ellipsoid is a mathematically defined regular surface with specific dimensions. The geoid, on the other hand, coincides with that surface to which the oceans would conform over the entire Earth if free to adjust to the combined effect of the Earth's mass attraction (gravitation) and the centrifugal force of the Earth's rotation. As a result of the uneven distribution of the Earth's mass, the geoidal surface is irregular and, since the ellipsoid is a regular surface, the separations between the two, referred to as geoid undulations, geoid heights, or geoid separations, will be irregular as well.

The geoid is a surface along which the gravity potential is equal everywhere and to which the direction of gravity is always perpendicular. The latter is particularly important because optical instruments containing gravity-reference leveling devices are commonly used to make geodetic measurements. When properly adjusted, the vertical axis of the instrument coincides with the direction of gravity and is, therefore, perpendicular to the geoid. The angle between the plumb line which is perpendicular to the geoid (sometimes called "the vertical") and the perpendicular to the ellipsoid (sometimes called "the ellipsoidal normal") is defined as the deflection of the vertical. It has two components: an east–west and a north–south component.^[3]

Local approximations

Simpler local approximations are possible.

Local tangent plane

Local tangent plane.

The local tangent plane is appropriate for analysis across small distances.

Osculating sphere

Ellipsoid and osculating sphere

The best local spherical approximation to the ellipsoid in the vicinity of a given point is the Earth's osculating sphere. Its radius equals Earth's Gaussian radius of curvature, and its radial direction coincides with the geodetic normal direction. The center of the osculating sphere is offset from the center of the ellipsoid, but is at the center of curvature for the given point on the ellipsoid surface. This concept aids the interpretation of terrestrial and planetary radio occultation refraction measurements and in some navigation and surveillance applications.^[15]^[16]

Earth rotation and Earth's interior

Determining the exact figure of the Earth is not only a geometric task of geodesy, but also has geophysical considerations. According to theoretical arguments by Newton, Leonhard Euler, and others, a body having a uniform density of 5,515 kg/m³ that rotates like the Earth should have a flattening of 1:229. This can be concluded without any information about the composition of Earth's interior.^[17] However, the measured flattening is 1:298.25, which is closer to a sphere and a strong argument that Earth's core is extremely compact. Therefore, the density must be a function of the depth, ranging from 2,600 kg/m³ at the surface (rock density of granite, etc.), up to 13,000 kg/m³ within the inner core.^[18]

Global and regional gravity field

Also with implications for the physical exploration of the Earth's interior is the gravitational field, which is the net effect of gravitation (due to mass attraction) and centrifugal force (due to rotation). It can be measured very accurately at the surface and remotely by satellites. True vertical generally does not correspond to theoretical vertical (deflection ranges up to 50") because topography and all geological masses disturb the gravitational field. Therefore, the gross structure of the Earth's crust and mantle can be determined by geodetic-geophysical models of the subsurface.

References

^ Cloud, John (2000). "Crossing the Olentangy River: The Figure of the Earth and the Military-Industrial-Academic Complex, 1947–1972". Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 31 (3): 371–404. Bibcode:2000SHPMP..31..371C. doi:10.1016/S1355-2198(00)00017-4.
^ Dicks, D.R. (1970). Early Greek Astronomy to Aristotle. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. pp. 72–198. ISBN 978-0-8014-0561-7.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Defense Mapping Agency (1983). Geodesy for the Layman (Report) (4th ed.). United States Air Force.
^ Heiskanen, W. A. (1962). "Is the Earth a triaxial ellipsoid?". Journal of Geophysical Research. 67 (1): 321–327. Bibcode:1962JGR....67..321H. doi:10.1029/JZ067i001p00321.
^ Burša, Milan (1993). "Parameters of the Earth's tri-axial level ellipsoid". Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica. 37 (1): 1–13. Bibcode:1993StGG...37....1B. doi:10.1007/BF01613918. S2CID 128674427.
^ Torge & Müller (2012) Geodesy, De Gruyter, p.100
^ Marchenko, A.N. (2009): Current estimation of the Earth’s mechanical and geometrical para meters. In Sideris, M.G., ed. (2009): Observing our changing Earth. IAG Symp. Proceed. 133., pp. 473–481. DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-85426-5_57
^ Morison, Samuel Eliot (1991) [1942]. Admiral of the Ocean Sea: A Life of Christopher Columbus. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. p. 557. ISBN 978-0-316-58478-4. OCLC 1154365097.
^ ^a ^b Tyson, Neil deGrasse (2007). Death By Black Hole: And Other Cosmic Quandaries (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-393-11378-5.
^ ^a ^b Hawkins, Gerald S. (1969) [1961]. Splendor in the Sky. New York: Harper & Row. p. 242.
^ O’Keefe, J. A., Eckeis, A., and Squires, R. K. (1959). "Vanguard Measurements Give Pear-Shaped Component of Earth’s Figure". Science, 129(3348), 565–566. doi:10.1126/science.129.3348.565.
^ King-Hele, D. G.; Cook, G. E. (1973). "Refining the Earth's Pear Shape". Nature. 246 (5428). Springer Nature: 86–88. Bibcode:1973Natur.246...86K. doi:10.1038/246086a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4260099.
^ King-Hele, Desmond (1967). "The Shape of the Earth". Scientific American. 217 (4): 67–80. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1067-67. JSTOR 24926147.
^ Günter Seeber (2008), Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter.
^ Williams, Paul; Last, David (3–7 November 2003). On Loran-C Time-Difference to Co-ordinate Converters (PDF). International Loran Association (ILA) – 32nd Annual Convention and Technical Symposium. Boulder, Colorado. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.594.6212.
^ Razin, Sheldon (Fall 1967). "Explicit (Noniterative) Loran Solution". Navigation: Journal of the Institute of Navigation. 14 (3): 265–269. doi:10.1002/j.2161-4296.1967.tb02208.x.
^ Heine, George (2013). "Euler and the Flattening of the Earth". Math Horizons. 21 (1). Mathematical Association of America: 25–29. doi:10.4169/mathhorizons.21.1.25. S2CID 126412032.
^ Dziewonski, A. M.; Anderson, D. L. (1981), "Preliminary reference Earth model" (PDF), Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 25 (4): 297–356, Bibcode:1981PEPI...25..297D, doi:10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7, ISSN 0031-9201

Attribution

This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain: Defense Mapping Agency (1983). Geodesy for the Layman (Report). United States Air Force.

External links

Reference Ellipsoids (PCI Geomatics)
Reference Ellipsoids (ScanEx)
Changes in Earth shape due to climate changes Archived 22 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine
Jos Leys "The shape of Planet Earth"

[1] Cloud, John (2000). "Crossing the Olentangy River: The Figure of the Earth and the Military-Industrial-Academic Complex, 1947–1972". Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 31 (3): 371–404. Bibcode:2000SHPMP..31..371C. doi:10.1016/S1355-2198(00)00017-4.

[2] Dicks, D.R. (1970). Early Greek Astronomy to Aristotle. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. pp. 72–198. ISBN 978-0-8014-0561-7.

[DMA-3] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Defense Mapping Agency (1983). Geodesy for the Layman (Report) (4th ed.). United States Air Force.

[4] Heiskanen, W. A. (1962). "Is the Earth a triaxial ellipsoid?". Journal of Geophysical Research. 67 (1): 321–327. Bibcode:1962JGR....67..321H. doi:10.1029/JZ067i001p00321.

[5] Burša, Milan (1993). "Parameters of the Earth's tri-axial level ellipsoid". Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica. 37 (1): 1–13. Bibcode:1993StGG...37....1B. doi:10.1007/BF01613918. S2CID 128674427.

[6] Torge & Müller (2012) Geodesy, De Gruyter, p.100

[7] Marchenko, A.N. (2009): Current estimation of the Earth’s mechanical and geometrical para meters. In Sideris, M.G., ed. (2009): Observing our changing Earth. IAG Symp. Proceed. 133., pp. 473–481. DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-85426-5_57

[8] Morison, Samuel Eliot (1991) [1942]. Admiral of the Ocean Sea: A Life of Christopher Columbus. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. p. 557. ISBN 978-0-316-58478-4. OCLC 1154365097.

[:0-9] Tyson, Neil deGrasse (2007). Death By Black Hole: And Other Cosmic Quandaries (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-393-11378-5.

[:1-10] Hawkins, Gerald S. (1969) [1961]. Splendor in the Sky. New York: Harper & Row. p. 242.

[11] O’Keefe, J. A., Eckeis, A., and Squires, R. K. (1959). "Vanguard Measurements Give Pear-Shaped Component of Earth’s Figure". Science, 129(3348), 565–566. doi:10.1126/science.129.3348.565.

[12] King-Hele, D. G.; Cook, G. E. (1973). "Refining the Earth's Pear Shape". Nature. 246 (5428). Springer Nature: 86–88. Bibcode:1973Natur.246...86K. doi:10.1038/246086a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4260099.

[13] King-Hele, Desmond (1967). "The Shape of the Earth". Scientific American. 217 (4): 67–80. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1067-67. JSTOR 24926147.

[14] Günter Seeber (2008), Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter.

[Williams-15] Williams, Paul; Last, David (3–7 November 2003). On Loran-C Time-Difference to Co-ordinate Converters (PDF). International Loran Association (ILA) – 32nd Annual Convention and Technical Symposium. Boulder, Colorado. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.594.6212.

[Razin-16] Razin, Sheldon (Fall 1967). "Explicit (Noniterative) Loran Solution". Navigation: Journal of the Institute of Navigation. 14 (3): 265–269. doi:10.1002/j.2161-4296.1967.tb02208.x.

[17] Heine, George (2013). "Euler and the Flattening of the Earth". Math Horizons. 21 (1). Mathematical Association of America: 25–29. doi:10.4169/mathhorizons.21.1.25. S2CID 126412032.

[PREM-18] Dziewonski, A. M.; Anderson, D. L. (1981), "Preliminary reference Earth model" (PDF), Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 25 (4): 297–356, Bibcode:1981PEPI...25..297D, doi:10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7, ISSN 0031-9201

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]