Fairway is a part of a water body (bay, harbor, river) containing the navigable channel (also known as a ship channel), a route suitable for ships of the larger size[1] (with draft closer to the draft limit).
Fairway depth, width, and height
editThe underwater cross-section of a ship in the channel is limited by the fairway depth and width (bridges may create restrictions for the height above the waterline). Fairway depth is a distance between the seabed/riverbed and the water surface. The fairway depth of a river varies with the season, so some standardized depth value is used, usually the one corresponding to the low navigable water level (LNWL) defined as the water level that the river stays above during almost the entire navigation season: statistically, the level shall stay below the LNWL for 20 ice-free days per year, corresponding to 5-6% of the ice-free period on European rivers.[2] The fairway width is defined as a width of the cross-section of the river that corresponds to the fairway depth,[3] the fairway height under the bridges is usually specified with respect to the highest navigable water level (HNWL).[4]
Fairway and navigable channel
editThe term "fairway" usually means all the navigable waters between the fairway buoys (that indicate the ends of the channel), even the routes only accessible to the lighter-draft vessels.[1] Some authors restrict the definition to the linear approach part of a marine waterway, the approach channel leading into a port. [5]
Legal definitions of the navigable channel differ depending on the context. In many cases any part of water body that can be navigated is considered to be navigable waters, although in the US (per Title 33 of the United States Code) the term applies to the waters over which the US Congress has jurisdiction to regulate the commerce,[6] individual states apply similar criteria.[7] The courts, however, use an expanded definition and include into the scope of Title 33, for example, waters "frequented by small, pleasure-fishing crafts".[8]
The center of the navigable channel lies on the thalweg, so in the international river law in case of disputed borders the border is assumed to follow the thalweg, as doing otherwise would deny the navigation rights to one side.[9]
Fairway management in Europe
editMany major European rivers (e.g., Rhine, Danube, Moselle, Meuse, and Sava) have long-established systems for waterway management.[10] Some countries, primarily in Scandinavia, charge the ships fairway dues, fees intended to support maintenance of the fairways (e. g., dredging).[11] The following table contains the parameters of some of the European waterways.[12]
| River basin | Authority | Depth | Width | Height | Days of availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danube | Danube Commission | 2.50 m (draft) | 50–180 m | 6.40-10.00 m | 343 |
| Moselle | Moselle Commission | 1.90-3.00 m (fairway depth) | 40m | 6.00 m | 365 |
| Rhine | Central Commission for Navigation on the Rhine | 1.90-3.00 m (fairway depth), depending on the section | 88–150 m | 7.00-9.10m | 345 |
| Sava | International Sava River Basin Commission | 2.50 m (draft), 2.80 m for Class IV sections | 55 m | 7.00 m | 343 |
| Elbe | 1.5–1.6 m (navigation channel depth) for section Geesthacht, 1.9 m (navigation channel depth) for other free-flowing sections, 2.2 m (draft) for regulated section | ||||
| Meuse | International Meuse Commission | 2.50 m (draft) | 5.25 m | ||
| Oder | 1.80 m (navigation channel depth) for border section, 3.00 m (navigation channel depth) for Klützer Querfahrt | ||||
| Scheldt | International Scheldt Commission | 2.50 m (draft) | 5.25 m |
Fairway management in the US
editInland waterways in the United states are managed by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).[citation needed] A mechanism similar to the fairway dues, a Harbor Maintenance Tax on imports is used to finance the maintenance (primarily dredging) of the ports on the coasts and Great Lakes.[13]
| River basin | Authority | Depth | Width | Height | Length | Days of availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri River[14] | USACE | 2.70 m | 91 m | 1181 km | 245 | |
| Upper Mississippi River (UMR)-Illinois Waterway (IWW)[15] | USACE | 9 ft | 300-500 m | 1200 miles | 245 for UMR;[16] IWW operates year-round[17] |
References
edit- ^ a b René de baron Kerchove (1961). "Fairway". International Maritime Dictionary: An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Useful Maritime Terms and Phrases, Together with Equivalents in French and German (2 ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold. p. 273. ISBN 978-0-442-02062-0. OCLC 1039382382.
- ^ UNECE (2017). Inventory of Main Standards and Parameters of the E Waterway Network (Blue Book) (PDF) (3rd ed.). New York and Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. p. 15.
- ^ Muilerman et al. 2018, p. 65.
- ^ Muilerman et al. 2018, p. 66.
- ^ Gucma, Stanisław; Zalewski, Paweł (2020). "Optimization of fairway design parameters: Systematic approach to manoeuvring safety". International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 12: 129–145. Bibcode:2020IJNAO..12..129G. doi:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2019.08.002. ISSN 2092-6782. S2CID 203036943.
- ^ René de baron Kerchove (1961). "Navigable waters". International Maritime Dictionary: An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Useful Maritime Terms and Phrases, Together with Equivalents in French and German (2 ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold. p. 531. ISBN 978-0-442-02062-0. OCLC 1039382382.
- ^ New Jersey Register, Volume 18, Issues 1-8. Administrative Publications of the Office of Administrative Law. 1986. OCLC 1375930.
Navigable channel means a channel marked with navigational markers including poles, piling or buoys, by the Coast Guard or the State.
- ^ Dennis W. Nixon; Michael J. Daly; Susan E. Farady; Read D. Porter; Julia B. Wyman (31 March 2022). Marine and Coastal Law: Cases and Materials (3 ed.). ABC-CLIO. p. 513. ISBN 978-1-4408-7740-7. OCLC 1303558946.
- ^ Nuno Marques Antunes (16 May 2022). Towards the Conceptualisation of Maritime Delimitation: Legal and Technical Aspects of Political Process. BRILL. p. 170. ISBN 978-90-04-48205-0. OCLC 1321803406.
- ^ Muilerman et al. 2018, p. 61.
- ^ Peter Brodie (3 June 2013). "Fairway dues". Dictionary of Shipping Terms (6 ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 83. ISBN 978-1-135-04622-4.
- ^ Muilerman et al. 2018, p. 62.
- ^ Merkel & Lindgren 2022.
- ^ USACE 2004, p. 620.
- ^ U.S. Army Engineer District, Rock Island 1989, p. 2.
- ^ USACE 2004, p. 49.
Sources
edit- Muilerman, Gert-Jan; Maierbrugger, Gudrun; Armbrecht, Henrik; Schepper, Karin de; Turf, Sim; Liere, Richard van; Quispel, Martin (2018). Good Navigation Status: guidelines towards achieving a Good Navigation Status. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2832/148049. ISBN 978-92-79-81043-5.
- Alshareef, Mohammed Hamed (2019). Three Essays on Waterborne Transportation (PDF) (PhD thesis). Fargo, North Dakota: North Dakota State University.
- USACE (2004). Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway System Navigation Feasibility Study, Integrated Feasibility Report: Environmental Impact Statement. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
- Upper Mississippi River Navigation Charts (in Italian). U.S. Army Engineer District, Rock Island. 1989. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
- Merkel, Axel; Lindgren, Samuel (2022). "Effects of fairway dues on the deployment and utilization of vessels: Lessons from a regression discontinuity design". Transport Policy. 126: 204–214. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.018.
 | This article related to water transport is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |