Submission declined on 25 July 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 21 June 2024 by S0091 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by S0091 5 months ago. |
- Comment: MusicBrainz is user-generated so not a reliable source and the AllMusic review is not in-depth. I suggest checking Newspapers.com via the WP:Wikipedia Library to which you have access and Internet Archive. S0091 (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
"The Working Hour: An Introduction to Tears for Fears" is a compilation album by the English pop rock band Tears for Fears. Released by Mercury Records on 26 March 2001.
The Working Hour: An Introduction to Tears for Fears | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Compilation album by | ||||
Released | March 26, 2001 | |||
Genre | Pop/Rock | |||
Length | 1:17:26 | |||
Label | Mercury/Universal | |||
Tears for Fears chronology | ||||
|
Reception
editReview scores | |
---|---|
Source | Rating |
AllMusic | [1] |
The Encyclopedia of Popular Music | [2] |
James Christopher Monger of AllMusic states that it collects "15 tracks from the mercurial English pop group, culled from all of their albums up to 1993's Elemental." going on to state that it "keeps the collection relegated to the shadows behind far better overviews like Shout: The Very Best of Tears for Fears and 2006's Gold."[1]
Track listing
editNo. | Title | Length |
---|---|---|
1. | "Pale Shelter" | 4:36 |
2. | "Memories Fade" | 5:06 |
3. | "Start of the Breakdown" | 4:57 |
4. | "The Hurting" | 4:15 |
5. | "The Marauders" | 4:13 |
6. | "The Working Hour" | 6:33 |
7. | "Shout (U.S. Remix)" | 8:01 |
8. | "Head over Heels" | 4:15 |
9. | "Sowing the Seeds of Love" | 6:15 |
10. | "Standing on the Corner of the Third World" | 5:30 |
11. | "Johnny Panic and the Bible of Dreams" | 4:18 |
12. | "Break It Down Again" | 4:31 |
13. | "Elemental" | 5:30 |
14. | "Bloodletting Go" | 4:12 |
15. | "The Body Wah" | 5:19 |
Total length: | 01:17:26 |
References
edit- ^ a b The Working Hour: An Introduction to Tears for Fears on AllMusic, retrieved 2024-06-20
- ^ "The Encyclopedia of Popular Music". Internet Archive. New York : Oxford University Press. 2004. Retrieved 24 July 2024.