List of locations and entities by greenhouse gas emissions
This article is a list of locations and entities by greenhouse gas emissions, i.e. the greenhouse gas emissions from companies, activities, and countries on Earth which cause climate change. The relevant greenhouse gases are mainly: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and the fluorinated gases[2] bromofluorocarbon, chlorofluorocarbon, hydrochlorofluorocarbon,[3] hydrofluorocarbon,[4] nitrogen trifluoride,[3] perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride.[4]
The extraction and subsequent use of fossil fuels coal, oil and natural gas,[5] as a fuel source, is the largest contributor to global warming.[6]
Carbon dioxide
editRanked 10 most countries
editDuring June of 2023, with 12705 million tonnes CO2e produced, China is the largest emitter; United States is second with 6,001, India 3,394, EU (which is 27 countries) 3,383, Russia 2,476, Japan 1,166, Brazil 1,057, Indonesia 1,002, Iran 893, and Canada 736.[7]
Scope 1+3 emissions, cumulative of the years 1988 - 2015, from oil and gas extraction
editThis section uses data from [8] a climate accountability[9] report of Heede, van Der Vlugt and Griffin of the Carbon Disclosure Project.[8] While data of emissions "Direct operational" and indirectly caused from the companies surveyed were indicated by the CDP, requests for data which were ignored by companies and emissions resulting from the use of products originating with companies were included as estimates by the researchers.[8] The data used by the CDP scientists is a composite of quantities of emissions as described via the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (GHGPCS): Scope 1 and Scope 3 emissions (not including Scope 2) - these three being all the possible Scope-emission types. 1 is direct emissions sources from a companies owned or possessed resources, 3 is indirect sources subsequential from production activities; these are divided by GHGPCS into types: upstream and downstream, and 15 categories.[10] Scope 3 emissions are thought to be approximately 90% of the total from any company and result from the combustion of coal, and, or, oil, and, or, gas during the conversion of these into energy i.e. as fuel; which is categorized as a downstream.[8] The relevant tables below have a ranking of 20 industrial greenhouse gas emitters from 1988 to 2015 from the Carbon Majors Database (CDP)[11] report,[8] a 10 July 2017[12] dataset of GtCO2e.[13]
The table below shows the total combined (cumulative) emissions as a percentage of all emissions. Oil and gas production data was obtained from annual reports from company websites and the SEC (2016). For some state owned enterprises, data was sourced from the ‘Oil & Gas Journal’ (1986-2016) or is estimated from national statistics (EIA 2017, BP 2016, and OPEC 2016):
Rank | Company | Country | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Aramco) | Saudi Arabia | 4.8% |
2 | Gazprom OAO | Russia | 4.2% |
3 | National Iranian Oil Co | Iran | 2.3% |
4 | ExxonMobil Corp | United States | 2.1% |
5 | Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) | Mexico | 2.0% |
6 | Shell plc | United Kingdom | 1.8% |
7 | BP PLC | United Kingdom | 1.7% |
8 | China National Petroleum Corp (PetroChina) | China | 1.6% |
9 | Chevron Corp | United States | 1.4% |
10 | Petroleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA) | Venezuela | 1.3% |
11 | Abu Dhabi National Oil Co | United Arab Emirates | 1.2% |
12 | Kuwait Petroleum Corp | Kuwait | 1.0% |
13 | Total SA | France | 1.0% |
14 | Sonatrach SPA | Algeria | 1.0% |
15 | ConocoPhillips | United States | 1.0% |
16 | Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras) | Brazil | 0.8% |
17 | Nigerian National Petroleum Corp | Nigeria | 0.7% |
18 | Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) | Malaysia | 0.7% |
19 | Rosneft OAO | Russia | 0.7% |
20 | Lukoil OAO | Russia | 0.7% |
SUM | 32.0% |
All cause 1+3 cumulative emissions
editThe Guardian newspaper (England, Britain)[14] and Acciona[15] (bracketed); both citing CDP:[8]
Rank | Company | Country | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
1 | China (Coal) | China | 14.32% (14.3%) |
2 | Saudi Aramco | Saudi Arabia | 4.50% (4.5%) |
3 | Gazprom | Russia | 3.91% (3.9%) |
4 | National Iranian Oil Company | Iran | 2.28% (2.3%) |
5 | ExxonMobil | United States | 1.98% (2.0%) |
6 | Coal India | India | 1.87% (1.9%) |
7 | Petróleos Mexicanos | Mexico | 1.87% (1.9%) |
8 | Russia (Coal) | Russia | 1.86% (1.9%) |
9 | Shell | United Kingdom | 1.67% (1.7%) |
10 | China National Petroleum Corporation | China | 1.56% (1.6%) |
11 | BP | United Kingdom | 1.53% |
12 | Chevron Corporation | United States | 1.31% |
13 | PDVSA | Venezuela | 1.23% |
14 | Abu Dhabi National Oil Company | United Arab Emirates | 1.20% |
15 | Poland (Coal) | Poland | 1.16% |
16 | Peabody Energy | United States | 1.15% |
17 | Sonatrach | Algeria | 1.00% |
18 | Kuwait Petroleum Corporation | Kuwait | 1.00% |
19 | Total | France | 0.95% |
20 | BHP | Australia | 0.91% |
SUM | 47.2% |
Scope 3
editScope 3 emissions are thought to be approximately 90% of the total from any company (Scope 1) and result from fuel combustion.[8]
Vehicle emissions
editPickup trucks were found to produce the most emissions in a group of vehicles including SUVs and cars, in a survey reported January 2022.[16] Excluding pickup trucks, the most polluting car type surveyed 2017 is the 2011 - 2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee which creates 372 grams per kilometre from the exhaust pipe, the 2007 - 2014 Audi R8 creates 346, thirdly the Chevrolet Camaro 335, the tenth most polluting, the Porsche Macan creates 291.[17]
Home: cooking fuels and technologies
editThe World Health Organization considers that during 2018 approximately 3 billion people, which was more than 40% of the 2018 estimated global population, used polluting fuel sources in their residences.[18]
Largest sources carbon dioxide (Scope 1)
editThis part details most CO2 emissions for the year 2021 using Climate TRACE:[19]
Rank | Source | Emission (million tonnes) |
---|---|---|
1 | Permian Oil and Gas Field, Texas, United States | 208.61 |
2 | Urengoyskoye Russia | 152.0 |
3 | North of Quebec, Canada [19] logging operations[20] | 126.77 |
4 | Marcellus, United States, oil and gas field | 124.38 |
5 | Bovanenkovskoye, Russia, oil and gas field | 122.69 |
6 | South Pars, Iran, oil and gas field | 118.09 |
7 | Zapolyarnoye, Russia, oil and gas field | 105.41 |
8 | Permian New Mexico, United States, oil and gas field | 93.12 |
Largest point source (Scope 1)
editThis section details production sites at single locations where the most pollution exists or existed in the recent past.
During March 2020, Secunda CTL, owned by Sasol, a synthetic fuel[21] and chemicals from coal [22] plant in Secunda, South Africa, was the producer of the single most emissions, at 56.5 million tonnes of CO2 a year.[21] The Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment (DFFE) of the Government of South Africa determined Sasol has until 1 April 2025 to comply with the legal limits for emissions,[23][24] as described by the Air Quality Act 2004:Part 3; 12; Category 3.[25] Sasol's pledge to reduce its emissions from the plant by 10% by 2030 was reported during November 2020,[26] during 2023 it was reported that this was amended to 30%.[27]
As of 2021[update] the gas-fired power plant which emits the most was the Taichung Power Station in Taiwan, at 34.19 million tonnes CO2.[28][19]
Methane
editSources of anthropogenic production are in the majority:
- natural gas, petroleum, and coal mining:[29] the United States produced the most recent emissions from oil and gas sources at least prior to April 2023.[30]
- livestock [31] production systems;[32] manure and enteric fermentation,[31]
- waste deposit sites: landfills [29] waste water[33]
Carbon bomb projects (new extractions)
editA carbon bomb, or climate bomb,[34] is any new extraction of hydrocarbons from underground whose potential greenhouse gas emissions exceed 1 billion tonnes of CO2 worldwide. In 2022, a study showed that there are 425 fossil fuel extraction projects (coal, oil and gas) with potential CO2 emissions of more than 1 billion tonnes worldwide. The potential emissions from these projects are twice the 1.5°C carbon budget of the Paris Agreement. According to these researchers, defusing carbon bombs should be a priority for climate change mitigation policy.[35]
According to the same study, the Global Energy Monitor and "Banking on Climate Chaos" associations, between 2016 and 2022, the main backers of these climate bombs are the American banks JPMorgan Chase, Citibank and Bank of America.[36]
Between 2020 and 2022, at least twenty new "climate bombs" went into operation, reveals an international journalistic investigation.[37][38][36] In this survey, France's TotalEnergies is cited as the second most responsible group for fossil mega-fields, with a presence at 23 major hydrocarbon extraction sites.[39] In November 2023, China's China Energy will lead the ranking and Saudi Aramco of Saudi Arabia will be third.[40]
Examples
edit- Exploitation of new coal mines in Australia.[41]
- Exploiting Canada's oil sands.[42]
- Shale gas extraction, for instance in Permian basin in Texas[43]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Guevara, Marc; Enciso, Santiago; Tena, Carles; Jorba, Oriol; Dellaert, Stijn; Denier van der Gon, Hugo; Pérez García-Pando, Carlos (15 January 2024). "A global catalogue of CO2 emissions and co-emitted species from power plants, including high-resolution vertical and temporal profiles". Earth System Science Data. 16 (1): 337–373. doi:10.5194/essd-16-337-2024. hdl:2117/405068.
- ^ "Climate Change Indicators: Major Long-Lived Greenhouse Gases and Their Characteristics". www.epa.gov. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 16 December 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2023.
- ^ a b "ACS Climate Science Toolkit Greenhouse Gases". www.acs.org. ACS. Retrieved 18 June 2023.
- ^ a b "CLEAR Center Clarity and Leadership for Environmental Awareness and Research at UC Davis". clear.ucdavis.edu. University of California, Davis Campus. 20 September 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2023.
- ^ University of California Museum of Paleontology. "Understanding Global Change – Discover why the climate and environment changes, your place in the Earth system, and paths to a resilient future". ugc.berkeley.edu. University of California. Retrieved 18 June 2023.
- ^ "Causes of Global Warming". wwf.org.au. WWF-Australia. Retrieved 18 June 2023.
- ^ Friedrich, Johannes; Ge, Mengpin; Pickens, Andrew; Vigna, Leandro (2 March 2023). "World's Top Emitters Interactive Chart". www.wri.org. World Resources Institute. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f g Griffin, Dr P. "The Carbon Majors Database CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017 100 fossil fuel producers and nearly 1 trillion tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions" (PDF). Retrieved 12 June 2023.
- ^ Faria, Pedro; Griffin, Dr. P. "CDP foreword - A fresh angle to an old debate" (PDF). www.cdp.net. p. 4. Retrieved 12 June 2023.
- ^ https://www.climatepartner.com/en/scope-1-2-3-complete-guide https://www.climatepartner.com
- ^ Griffin, Dr. P.; Heede, R.; van Der Vlugt, I. "The Carbon Majors Database Methodology Report 2017" (PDF). www.cdp.net. Retrieved 12 June 2023.
- ^ New report shows just 100 companies are source of over 70% of emissions https://www.cdp.net/ Retrieved 12 June 2023.
- ^ Griffin, Dr. P.; Heede, R.; van Der Vlugt, I. "The Carbon Majors Database Dataset 1.0 Methodology and Results" (PDF). www.cdp.net. Retrieved 12 June 2023.
- ^ Riley, Tess (10 July 2017). "Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study says". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 7 August 2018.
- ^ 100 Companies Are Responsible for 71% of GHG Emissions https://www.acciona.com/
- ^ Automotive Industry www.weforum.org Statista Mobility Market Outlook Retrieved 16 June 2023
- ^ "Car CO2 emissions explained". www.which.co.uk. Which?. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- ^ "9 out of 10 people worldwide breathe polluted air, but more countries are taking action". www.who.int. World Health Organization. 2 May 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2023.
- ^ a b c https://climatetrace.org/map Retrieved 14 June 2023
- ^ Cloe Logan (1 November 2021) New report shows emissions from Canada's forestry sector are vastly underreported www.nationalobserver.com
- ^ a b Sguazzin, Antony (17 March 2020). March 2020/south-africa-living-near-the-world-s-biggest-emitting-plant "The World's Biggest Emitter of Greenhouse Gases". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
{{cite news}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ "10.2.1. Commercial Use of Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis". netl.doe.gov/. National Energy Technology Laboratory. Retrieved 13 June 2023.
- ^ "Secunda: living in the shadow of the world's biggest carbon polluter". www.news24.com/. City Press, Auckland Park. Retrieved 13 June 2023.
- ^ "Managing Air Quality Compliance". www.sasol.com. Sasol. Retrieved 13 June 2023.
- ^ Sonjica, Buyefwa Patience. "Staatskoerant, 31 Maart 2010 No. 33064 3 Government Notice – Department of Environmental Affairs – No. 248 31 March 2010 National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004 (Act no. 39 of 2004) List of Activities Which Result in Atmospheric Emissions Which Have or May Have a Significant Detrimental Effect on the Environment, Including Health, Social Conditions, Economic Conditions, Ecological Conditions or Cultural Heritage" (PDF). www.dffe.gov.za/. Republic of South Africa Government.
- ^ https://www.energyvoice.com/renewables-energy-transition/ccs/africa-ccs/278257/sasol-carbon-secunda-gas/ https://www.energyvoice.com/
- ^ https://www.energyvoice.com/renewables-energy-transition/hydrogen/africa-hydrogen/477652/sasol-signs-up-green-power-at-secunda-sasolburg/ https://www.energyvoice.com/
- ^ Jeremy Freeman, et al. Power Sector Climate Trace github.com/ p.20 Retrieved 14 June 2023
- ^ a b Allen, D (19 July 2016). "Attributing Atmospheric Methane to Anthropogenic Emission". Accounts of Chemical Research. 49 (7). USA.gov: 1344–1350. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00081. PMID 27314507.
- ^ luxiao, Xiao Lu; Jacob, Daniel J.; Zhang, Yuzhong; Fan, Shaojia (17 April 2023). "Observation-derived 2010-2019 trends in methane emissions and intensities from US oil and gas fields tied to activity metrics". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120 (17). National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: e2217900120. Bibcode:2023PNAS..12017900L. doi:10.1073/pnas.2217900120. PMC 10151460. PMID 37068241.
- ^ a b "Home News, Stories & Speeches - story: Climate Action". www.unep.org. United Nations Environmental Programme. 20 August 2021. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
- ^ "Enteric fermentation Improving food security and livelihoods by reducing enteric methane emissions". www.ccacoalition.org. Climate and Clean Air Coalition (United Nations). 6 December 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
- ^ Bogner, Jean; Ahmed, Mohammed Abdelrafie; Diaz, Cristobal; Faaij, Andre; Gao, Qingxian; Hashimoto, Seiji; Mareckova, Katarina; Pipatti, Riitta; Zhang, Tianzhu; Diaz, Luis; Kjeldsen, Peter; Monni, Suvi. "Waste Management" (PDF). www.ipcc.ch. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. p. 588. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
- ^ "« Bombes carbone » : TotalEnergies, numéro deux mondial des mégagisements fossiles". Le Monde. 31 October 2023. Retrieved 31 October 2023.
- ^ Kühne, Kjell; Bartsch, Nils; Tate, Ryan Driskell; Higson, Julia (1 July 2022). ""Carbon Bombs" - Mapping key fossil fuel projects" (PDF). Energy Policy. 166: 112950. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112950. ISSN 0301-4215. S2CID 248756651. Retrieved 31 October 2023.
- ^ a b Niranjan, Ajit (31 October 2023). "Banks pumped more than $150bn in to companies running 'carbon bomb' projects in 2022". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 31 October 2023.
- ^ October 2023/emissions-de-co2-vingt-nouvelles-bombes-climatiques-exploitees-depuis-2020 "Emissions de CO2 : vingt nouvelles « bombes climatiques » exploitées depuis 2020". Le Soir (in French). 31 October 2023. Retrieved 31 October 2023.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help) - ^ "« Bombes carbone » : ces projets fossiles qui ruinent les efforts pour le climat". Le Monde.fr (in French). 31 October 2023. Retrieved 31 October 2023.
- ^ "« Bombes carbone » : TotalEnergies, numéro deux mondial des mégagisements fossiles". Le Monde.fr (in French). 31 October 2023. Retrieved 2 November 2023.
- ^ "Les « bombes carbone » qui empirent le dérèglement climatique, une responsabilité partagée entre Etats, entreprises et banques". Le Monde.fr (in French). 1 November 2023. Retrieved 2 November 2023.
- ^ "10 major insurers refuse to support Australian 'carbon bomb' coal mine - IEMA". www.iema.net. Retrieved 4 November 2023.
- ^ "Canada is sitting on 12 'carbon bombs.' Here's where they are". CBC/Radio-Canada. Retrieved 4 November 2023.
- ^ Les Amis de la Terre - France; Reclaim Finance (May 2020). "La Place financière de Paris au fond du puits" (PDF). amisdelaterre.org (in French). p. 13-28..
External links
edit- Stephen Conmy 4 April 2023 News Analysis The 20 most polluting companies in the world https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/
- "The Causes of Climate Change Human activities are driving the global warming trend observed since the mid-20th century". climate.nasa.gov. NASA.
- Supran, Geoffrey; Oreskes, Naomi (23 August 2017). "Assessing ExxonMobil's climate change communications (1977–2014)". Environmental Research Letters. 12 (8). IOP Publishing Ltd: 084019. Bibcode:2017ERL....12h4019S. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f.
- "FAQ" (PDF). ghgprotocol.org. Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
For "carbon bomb" projects: