Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Men's Issues

Nomination of Violence against men for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violence against men is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against men (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RfC on Male expendability

There is currently an active request for comment on Male expendability. Feel free to add your voices. Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposal to split MOS:GENDERID from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography

Comments invited.

• Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Proposal_to_split_MOS:GENDERID_from_Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biography

Bluerasberry (talk) 19:10, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 31 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 01:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

---

Wikipedia:WikiProject Men's Issues → Wikipedia:WikiProject Men's issues – No reason why Men's issues is capitalised. (I'm aware this WikiProject is inactive but is used on a number of pages) GnocchiFan (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

• There is no consistency in caps across WikiProjects. There are lots of examples like this: Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer Security, Wikipedia:WikiProject Dietary Supplements, Wikipedia:WikiProject Law Enforcement.... I don't see a compelling reason to enforce a particular capitalization scheme here in the Wikipedia namespace. Dekimasuよ! 15:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose. If we were to choose a consistent capitalization scheme, I would prefer title case for WikiProjects, which most of them seem to use (including this one). Even if it should be sentence case, is there a reason why the first word after WikiProject would be capitalized? And per Dekimasu. SilverLocust 💬 17:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move notice

An editor has requested that Fathers' rights movement be moved to Fathers' rights, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Inclusion of Queer

The article Queer was recently added to, and then removed from this Wikiproject by users who are not listed as participants. Editors here may want to consider that article for inclusion properly. — HTGS (talk) 00:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Difficult… overlapping but not a subset. Blueboar (talk) 12:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)