 | The following is a draft working towards a proposal for adoption as a Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal must not be taken to represent consensus, but is still in development and under discussion, and has not yet reached the process of gathering consensus for adoption. Thus references or links to this page should not describe it as policy, guideline, nor yet even as a proposal. |
Every year, editors review some 2,400 good articles and 300 featured articles. Quality varies among those reviews but some are exceptional for their handling of difficult subject matter, breadth in a broad topic, or general review effort. Some are just great examples of getting the job done without needless length. This is a page for peer consideration and community affirmation for these exceptional reviews.
Nomination process
edit(workshop on the talk page)
- Anyone may nominate a review for consideration (including peer, GA, FA, and talk page reviews) with a concise rationale for what distinguishes the review from the norm. Please use
{{u}}to notify the reviewers under consideration. Self-nominations are welcome. - Editors peruse and discuss these nominees when posted.
- In the last week of the month, nominees go up for a vote by acclamation. All may comment but only support votes by registered users in good standing are tallied. After the 7th day (UTC) of the new month, the top nominees are recognized.