Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 22

< June 21	June 23 >

June 22

Template:CCD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happy‑melon 20:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CCD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Userpage message box for deleted project Thetrick (talk) 23:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Concordia has been inactive since 2007, so this user template is clearly not needed any more. Terraxos (talk) 00:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Terraxos. Was thinking there might be some interest in keeping historical userpages intact, but there's only one current transclusion (could userfy or subst). – Luna Santin (talk) 21:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tinyurl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - unused and unusable. Happy‑melon 20:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tinyurl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to the discussion page. Unused. Thetrick (talk) 20:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, we shouldn't be linking to tinyurl anyway. Stifle (talk) 13:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as tinyurl.com is one the many URL redirection sites on the m:spam blacklist (their main page only is on en.wikipedia's MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist), so this template in fact cannot be used at all. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tnw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - redundant to {{tlx}} etc, and unused. Happy‑melon 20:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tnw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to the discussion page. Unused. Thetrick (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The edit summary from the previous TfD attempt was (Unused template. Recommending for deletion.) Current no transclusions, no links. --Thetrick (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Single cover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happy‑melon 20:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Single cover (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of {{Non-free album cover}}. It doesn't meet the naming requirements for non-free copyright tags, so it's not a candidate for redirecting. —-Carnildo (talk) 20:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PostcodeSS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - survived from Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 18#Postcode templates Happy‑melon 20:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PostcodeSS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to the discussion page. Thetrick (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The edit summary from the previous nomination was (nominated for deletion). I believe this has been superceded by Template:Infobox UK postcode area. No transclusions, a few links from maintenence lists. --Thetrick (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:National Republican/meta/color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - redundant, unused, useless. Happy‑melon 20:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:National Republican/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to discussion page. Thetrick (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The edit summary from the previous nomination was (Template is wrong color and duplicates the existing National Republican Party (United States)/meta/color template). No transclusions, 1 link from a user talk page. --Thetrick (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PPortal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete - redundant, borderline G1. Happy‑melon 20:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PPortal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous TfD try didn't make it to the discussion page. Thetrick (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This appears to be a metatemplate, apparently to do with the portal namespace in some way, but it has no current transclusions or incoming links to suggest or explain any current uses (it simply returns the passed parameter, and does nothing else). Looked at the creating user's contribs for around the time they created this, but was unable to find any additional context that way. In the event this does have some use, it should be replaced with {{Echo}}. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Betacommandbot hater

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete per G10. While it is true that this is directed towards a bot, it is obviously a reflection of the bots operator. This isn't appropriate, doesn't help improve the encyclopedia, and has been deleted. Also, CSD#T1 applies here, as it is in the Template: namespace. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Betacommandbot hater (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Rude. Potentially WP:CSD#G10 but I suppose could be userfy-ed. 2 uses on 2 user pages. Thetrick (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it qualifies for G10, because a bot is a computer program, not a living person. ViperSnake151 15:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Anson Hu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happy‑melon 20:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anson Hu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Bio template for one person. Can't find exact parent template. 1 use in 1 article. Thetrick (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subst first, then delete. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 13:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have Done the SUBSTing of this, to the standard music info, box so we should no longer need to have this template (delete) NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 22:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Boring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happy‑melon 20:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boring (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, potentially insulting. Thetrick (talk) 06:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No one would use this template, cause no one would like to publically say that he is boring. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 09:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Made to humiliate users for being idle. Martarius (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I became bold and converted it to a userbox for people who think they are boring (if there are...anyway lol). You can close up shop now and move it to User boring ViperSnake151 15:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While I don't agree with the nom's statement of "potentially insulting" (anything has the potential to be insulting to someone), this userbox/template still doesn't seem to help wikipedia "advance forward". NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 19:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BlackPublicMedia.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. I also G11'ed the article :D Happy‑melon 20:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BlackPublicMedia.org (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Plain text that is duplicated in the article. Pointless. Thetrick (talk) 05:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense... Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 09:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you please provide a link to the article in question. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 19:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If you follow links above you will see it is used only on National Black Programming Consortium. --Thetrick (talk) 20:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Sorry, it seems I missed seeing the link in the article (which may need to be sent to WP:AFD). I guess delete per being a duplicate in the article? NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 22:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Aiw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Happy‑melon 20:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aiw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Logo for Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians. Old, seems unused. Thetrick (talk) 04:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Now people add [[Image:AIW_logo.png]] instead of adding template. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 10:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Best Continent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G7. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 09:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Best Continent (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Blank, unused template (is there a speedy category for this?) Thetrick (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Just tag the template with {{db-author}} (because author done the template, and then deleted it). I tagged the template. I close the discussion. Kubek15^{(Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX)} 09:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.