Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 July 27
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 July 27)
July 27
edit- no permission — Polarlys 01:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation, see [1] ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Zoomwaffles (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No license Uploader loaded companion picture Ron.jpg at the same time and gave it a PD-self license, but not this one. His only edits on record are to upload the two pictures and add them to Ron Stonitsch. If deleted, please replace with Ron.jpg which while not the better of the two pictures, does have a license. — Caerwine Caer’s whines 03:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- I love it when celebs upload free pics of themselves to Wikipedia :) -Nard 13:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Smallbones (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, low quality (improperly saved in JPEG format instead of PNG), replaced by Image:S&P 500 index around the time of the crash.png. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- The replacement file looks as good or better - it's fine with me to delete it. Somebody might put a message or reference on my talk page about how to properly save the file, so next time I save a file in the right format. Smallbones 09:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Misunderstanding of copyright (just because an image is freely available does not make it public domain), and it is an unfree image of that depicts a living person violatin of WP:NFCC #1) hbdragon88 05:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry for misunderstanding the copyright laws, but I would prefer to be further educated (and the image categories to be clarified) rather than have the image deleted. --Magmagirl 20:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, not enough info to determine encyclopedic use. — Calliopejen1 08:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Chairmeister (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, Orphaned, sole contrib But|seriously|folks 08:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Obsolete image, replaced by PNG version. Marwood 13:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons bleeding through. – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Again copyright violation. See original file Snake BGDtalk 14:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete User:Bluewings is removing the ifd tag he can't do that because in information tag sais: You are welcome to edit this file, but please do not remove this notice while the discussion is in progress, he is claiming that this image is free, but its not.
- OR — cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete moved to Commons. -Nard 15:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Silentaria (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Finalburning.jpg obsoleted by Finalburning.png -- SilentAria talk 15:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- User:(Automated conversion) (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR + OB by Image:Lines of Action move 01.svg — Papa November 1 17:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, Commons bleeding through – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- User:(Automated conversion) (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- User:(Automated conversion) (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned because Image:Macintosh delete key.png made this image obsolete. PNG crusade bot 17:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Low quality, license of the video visible in the screenshot is unknown. —Remember the dot (talk) 17:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Image is said to be know to have come from a press kit or similar source, but no verifiable information on such source is provided (there's only a link to a webpage that happens to use the image) Abu badali (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-free screenshot from a tv-program that is not even mentioned in the article it's used in. Anyway, the image just shows a man in a suit (it hardly would help in the understanding of the article's text). Abu badali (talk) 17:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, correctly identified unnecessary fair use. It was used in an old version of the page but as its no longer discussed, its a valid deletion. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 20:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-free press agency (Associated Press) photo. 1) Tagged with wrong license and 2) a textbook case of WP:NONFREE#Examples of unacceptable use #5. howcheng {chat} 18:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-free press agency photo. Textbook case of WP:NONFREE#Examples of unacceptable use #5. howcheng {chat} 18:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Americasroof (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Non-free magazine cover not necessary to understanding the text, violating WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 18:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Illustrates the article and section in question, clearly allowed by FU criteria.Rlevse 02:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Non-free stamp image not used for discussion on the stamp. howcheng {chat} 18:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Illustrates the article and section in question, clearly allowed by FU criteria.Rlevse 02:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- I point you to WP:NONFREE#Images. There is no discussion of this stamp. We can't just have the stamp image by itself without any discussion of what makes it notable. howcheng {chat} 05:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- No fair use rationale, uploader has been inactive for nearly a month, and I just noticed that it does not provide sufficient source and copyright information. — -- SilentAria talk 19:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- No fair use rationale, uploader has been inactive for nearly a month, and lack of source and copyright information. — -- SilentAria talk 19:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- No fair use rationale, uploader has been inactive for nearly a month, and lack of source and copyright information. — -- SilentAria talk 19:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Image is claimed to be released to public for promotional use, but image is from an unofficial fansite, and does not appear in its original form as it has been edited from that form. This would work better as a screen cap like countless others for the television series. 74.204.40.46 21:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Image is claimed to be released to public for promotional use, but image is from an unofficial fansite, and does not appear in its original form as it has been edited from that form. This would work better as a screen cap like countless others for the television series. 74.204.40.46 21:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Image is claimed to be released to public for promotional use, but image is from an unofficial fansite, and does not appear in its original form as it has been edited from that form. This would work better as a screen cap like countless others for the television series. 74.204.40.46 21:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Image has no clear source, source for image is another Wikipedia article, then there are dead links to pages that do not exist. Ejfetters 22:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- E Pluribus Anthony (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Delete - first off copyright tag and source info conflicts, first says its a capture in the source, then copyright says its a promo image and further into the rationale it says promo image. This is not a screen capture, its obviously a publicity photo from some other source that is not listed, as I myself have seen this publicity image around online. Ejfetters 22:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Image is claimed to be a film's screenshot, but it's more likely material produced to enhance the copyright holder's official site (I'm not confortable with the idea that this is a screenshot because 1. The image's proportion is not that of a movie's screen. 2. The character is facing the camera 3. The movie is still on cinema-only (how do you produce a screenshot in these cases?) ) Abu badali (talk) 00:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's from a standard officially released publicity shot, see eg here at IMDB; or here at MovieWeb. Completely appropriate fair use to illustrate the character. Jheald 14:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- JJ MacLean (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image was cited with tag for no fair use rationale in June, user has not added any rationale and the tag has expired. Now it has a no source tag on it also. Clearly, no one knows where this image came from, and the user is not adding information to this image. Ejfetters 02:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)