Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Greg Wohlwend/archive1
Greg Wohlwend
editThis is the complete topic of Wohlwend's independently notable works (as either an artist or a developer). Any topics without significant coverage were worked into the parent article. I also considered working Mikengreg (the partnership behind his first two games) into the topic, but I didn't feel that it was appropriate. Let me know if you feel otherwise. Otherwise, all of these articles are GA and I believe the topic meets the criteria. Thanks for your time czar ♔ 00:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Conditionalsupport; I would say Mikengreg is absolutely appropriate; this isn't a "Greg Wohlwend games" topic. Mike Boxleiter doesn't have an article, so why not? I'll support if Mikengreg is added. Tezero (talk) 00:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Tezero, where would it go? In a level between GW and their two games? czar ♔ 00:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- That works. Tezero (talk) 00:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Tezero, added czar ♔ 08:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, there we have it. Tezero (talk) 14:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Tezero, added czar ♔ 08:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- That works. Tezero (talk) 00:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Tezero, where would it go? In a level between GW and their two games? czar ♔ 00:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Looking over these articles, they look very good. BTW, I think the Ridiculous Fishing series of images might have a chance at FPC. What do you think about using JPGs so that they render sharper in the article? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! Responded at Talk:Ridiculous Fishing#JPG images czar ♔ 08:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support - looks good, and I also agree with having mikengreg in there. --PresN 15:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Supp made order less confusing. Nergaal (talk) 08:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic. --十八 20:46, 14 September 2014 (UTC)