Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Ph physical map.png

Physical map of the Philippines

Physical map of the Philippenes

Reason: Way below current size requirements. Much higher quality is possible, would not pass today; judging from arguments used in the previous delisting debates, it seems clear that our expectations and culture, as well as explicit guidelines, have changed. It's also worth noting that this was promoted before there was any formal FP criteria or nomination process; I think it's time for this one to go.
Articles this image appears in: Geography of the Philippines, Filipino martial arts, Outline of the Philippines, Lighthouses in the Philippines
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Ph physical map.png, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/2006#Ph physical map.png, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/2007#Physical map of the Philippines
Nominator: J Milburn (talk)

Delist — J Milburn (talk) 01:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. I would also expect a map such as this to be in SVG, for easy future editing/translation. Jujutacular ^T · C 03:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - I was hoping to vote keep, but the text is just far too small for the image size. Must look like it came out of one of the very early dot matrix printers if you zoomed in. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 13:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delist The image is simply too small. I do ask, however, why the image needs to be an SVG? Zooming in on a map provides no use to me: the amount of available detail would remain the same. Why not simply offer a high resolution PNG? I think any arguments about translation, while good for convenience, don't apply in FPC -- we often see the argument that other encyclopedias find an image valuable to be bantied around and subsequently dismissed. Cowtowner (talk) 07:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No- use on other projects is completely irrelevant. I will mention feature credits on other projects, but that's information rather than an argument in the image's favour. J Milburn (talk) 14:21, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I was referring more to Jujutacular's comment " I would also expect a map such as this to be in SVG, for easy future editing/translation." which seemed to imply their expectation of multi-project compatability. Cowtowner (talk) 14:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Good point about the translation, I agree that should be not be a factor for the enwiki FPC. However, SVG does allow increased flexibility for editing purposes in general (not just cross-wiki). Mostly though, I agree with the delisting per the nominator. Jujutacular ^T · C 03:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Makeemlighter (talk) 02:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]