Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold Coast (from The Spit).jpg
Gold Coast (from The Spit)
editI don't think that this photo lives up to featured picture standards. Not very contrasty, and there is too much sky (IMO).
- I can't find the archive where this was voted on. Can you? BrokenSegue 01:37, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- I couldn't find it either --Fir0002 09:29, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- If you checked the archived discussion from this page from when we did the big renomination, you'd find [1]. Just so you know. ed g2s • talk 11:25, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- I've forgotten how we do de-listings. Surely some sort of tag or note should be placed on the image page to alert the original contributor and anyone else watching it. -- Solipsist 08:05, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
- AFAIK we don't do delist that much, so there isn't a set of templates, or procedure for notifying the uploader. Feel free to create them. ed g2s • talk 12:31, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
- If you checked the archived discussion from this page from when we did the big renomination, you'd find [1]. Just so you know. ed g2s • talk 11:25, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- I couldn't find it either --Fir0002 09:29, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Delist. --Fir0002 08:33, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support Delist --jacobolus (t) 10:47, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delist Junes 10:52, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep
This might go with a bit more contrastEricd 14:04, 5 May 2005 (UTC) - Keep - From the image's info page "This photo was taken the morning after a wild storm. I think it shows the essence of the Gold Coast, perched on the shore, the buildings disappearing into the sea-spray". - Bevo 16:00, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Pretty in pastels, and adds significantly to Gold Coast. --Andrew 00:55, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep -It speaks to me, and does significantly add to Gold Coast. TomStar81 03:16, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delist BrokenSegue 19:37, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delist. Looks like a blurry tourist snapshot. Sandover 20:36, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
- It's sharp ! Ericd 21:08, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It caught a moment of beauty. And it should not be artificially "enhanced." Pollinator 21:26, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Delist. It's all right, but if you let this kind of picture be featured, then the standards aren't high enough to bar any picture. Deltabeignet 22:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
- I don't see any technical problem in this picture nor any problem in composition... So what ? it's pastel and people like saturated colors ? Ericd 14:43, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
Kept. 6-delist 5-keep - Bevo 16:59, 17 May 2005 (UTC)