Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Giraffe Mikumi National Park.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2011 at 08:29:39 (UTC)

Original - Giraffe, Mikumi National Park, Tanzania

Edit 1 Slightly warmer neck

Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 08:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support looking nice. Pine^talk 08:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The head and neck seem rather blue-tinged, perhaps because the giraffe is partially under a tree. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you like a selectively warmed version or would that be inappropriate manipulation --Muhammad(talk) 16:22, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have a problem with it, if not obvious. I don't know about other editors. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't object to edit 1 but I prefer having no edits where possible, and I don't have a problem with the original so I prefer it. Pine^talk 20:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support original: Thanks for the edit Muhammad, but it's still rather blue. I think we should stick to the non-edited version in this case. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have goofed in my edit summary, so to be clear I support the original. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think I prefer the edit. JJ Harrison (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. Very good, I love seeing the context and that funny thorny tree in the background. TehGrauniad (talk) 14:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose both -- Unfortunate crop, the poor animal looks caged! This affects the EV of the picture imo as the giraffe is an open space species! Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and quality-- Someone35 (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Giraffe Mikumi National Park.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]