Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Brandenburg Gate Quadriga at Night.jpg

Brandenburg Gate

Original - The Brandenburg Gate is a former city gate, one of the main symbols of Berlin, Germany, and is the only remaining gate of a series through which one formerly entered the city.

Existing FP

Reason: Looks really nice; I can't see anything that would detract from it's quality to the point of it being ineligible to be a Featured Picture.
Articles this image appears in: Brandenburg Gate
Creator: Fersy™

Support as nominator —Animum (talk) 22:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Way too much HDRI effect for my taste. Would prefer a more realistic photo. Kaldari (talk) 23:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support clear, sharp, and cool colors. Excellent pic. Clegs (talk) 23:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support a tad TOO sharp, otherwise I like it =D Dengero (talk) 02:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The image seems a little bottom-heavy. Would cropping some of the sky help balance the image? Spikebrennan (talk) 04:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Image seems a bit small to me and somewhat tilted. Also, isn't there already a FP of the Brandenburg Gate? -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 07:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is, but it only shows the quadriga on top. MER-C 07:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support Good quality image, but it looks slightly too digital. Juliancolton (Talk) 13:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looks great Mario1987 14:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Just a show-off pic, most of it is black, parts are overexposed, it has little detail (despite the obvious sharpening attempts). --Dschwen 16:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dschwen. Cacophony (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great picture. —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Looks like too much manipulation has gone on; the dark area seems overpowering. -- MightyWarrior (talk) 22:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely great. jon (blab) 17:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose low resolution and manipulated sharpness. --Krm500 (talk) 01:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support first image. crassic\^talk 03:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 09:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]