Hello, Yamsahh. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Thanks

edit

Ok, seen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daanayam (talkcontribs) 16:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 19:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Boubaker Polynomials

edit

I have proposed deletion of the article titled Boubaker Polynomials, which you created, for reasons that I stated in a template that now appears on that page. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply



 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yamsahh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is my single account, and please tell me what I did wrong. Yamsahh (talk) 23:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:55, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yamsahh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Which other accounts??, please either provide them or kindly unblock, I did not vandalise any page and did nothing offensing rules.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yamsahh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am an Autoconfirmed user since 31 July 2011, with an institutional confirmed e-mail address, you are perhaps making an error. I have no relation with other accounts except discussing or chat, so please may another Checkuser check that and unblock? , Thanks

Decline reason:

  Confirmed that this account has been used on the same computer at the same time as User:Future Perfct at Sunrıse and User:Daanayam. Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, there you have it. The blocking admin and the other two reviewing admins are all CheckUsers. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 03:55, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yamsahh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Checkusers, you talk about the same computer! this is really misleading, we have here in our local scholar server 76 computers!!!, So how to do?, I suggest to you to block any non confirmed account without email coordinates. As I told you, I am an Autoconfirmed user , with an institutional confirmed , used and active e-mail address, and before all without any act non conforming to Wikpedia policy. : Thank you for help and patience --Yamsahh (talk) 13:31, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

We have done everything you asked us to do. You are fresh out of excuses. This is your last request; I'm revoking access to your talk page so you don't waste our time and yours anymore. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
Your ability to edit this talk page during the block has been revoked due to abuse of the unblock template. If you wish to appeal the block further, contact the unblock mailing list at unblock-en-l lists.wikimedia.org.

Daniel Case (talk) 16:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply