Wikipedia Talk Page Notice
This is a Wikipedia talk page. It is not a forum for general discussion.
If you find this page on a site other than Wikipedia, you are likely viewing a mirror site. If such is the case, you should be aware the discussions may be outdated and may not be accurate representations of their latest versions, and the user may not have an affiliation with the site on which this page is mirrored.
The original location of this page is http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:Wlmaltby3.
Table of Contents

Archives
————————————————————
  1. September 2005
  2. December 2005
  3. March 2006
  4. April 2006
  5. May 2006
  6. June 2006
  7. January 2007
  8. March 2007
  9. April 2007
  10. May 2007
  11. June 2007
  12. July 2007
  13. August 2007
  14. October 2007
  15. November 2007
  16. December 2007
  17. January 2008
  18. February 2008
  19. March 2008
  20. April 2008
  21. May 2008
  22. June 2008
  23. July 2008
  24. August 2008
  25. September 2008
  26. October 2008
  27. January 2009
  28. March 2009
  29. April 2009

Baseball Template

edit

Hey there, I was wondering, if you have a free moment, creating a template for me. I endeavoured to re-engineer the Cleveland Browns retired numbers template, and it went horribably wrong. I'm trying to create a retired number template for the Nightcliff Tigers Baseball Club. Their colours are black and gold. I really like the one you created for the Browns and was hoping to create something similar - gold background with black writing. So, if you could help that would be much appreciated. You can leave it here [1] Thanks, Spy007au (talk) 06:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Omg its will run! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Ted Daisher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Steve Marshall (American football) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Najah Pruden - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Mel Tucker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Gerard Lawson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Najah Pruden

edit
 

The article Najah Pruden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP for over a year. As far as I could determine, Pruden never played an NFL match and therefore doesn't meet the American football criteria of WP:NSPORTS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Atreyu curse cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Atreyu curse cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Melila Purcell for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melila Purcell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melila Purcell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman 05:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alan DeGennaro for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan DeGennaro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan DeGennaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:30 Seconds to Mars album cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:30 Seconds to Mars album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:30 Seconds to Mars album cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:30 Seconds to Mars album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jerome Jackson (American football) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerome Jackson (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerome Jackson (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cbl62 (talk) 23:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Melila Purcell for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melila Purcell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melila Purcell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 23:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bullet Theory/My Dying Day

edit
 

The article Bullet Theory/My Dying Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:47, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Geneva Free Enterprise

edit
 

The article Geneva Free Enterprise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searching found no sources, may not exist, no basis for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 16:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Geneva Free Enterprise

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Geneva Free Enterprise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:2007 Cleveland Browns schedule

edit

 Template:2007 Cleveland Browns schedule has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jesse Ainsworth for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesse Ainsworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Ainsworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lepricavark (talk) 16:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ulrich Winkler for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulrich Winkler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulrich Winkler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Brent Pousson for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent Pousson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Pousson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alvin Smith (American football) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alvin Smith (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvin Smith (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mike Mason (American football)

edit
 

The article Mike Mason (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Steve Marshall (American football) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Marshall (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Marshall (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Melila Purcell

edit
 

Hello, Omg its will run. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melila Purcell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Underoath-Act of Depression.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Underoath-Act of Depression.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have nominated List of Cleveland Browns first-round draft picks for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

List of Cleveland Browns seasons at WP:FLRC

edit

I have nominated List of Cleveland Browns seasons for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply