{{NoACEMM}} Archives:

Archive for all discussions preceding July 2023
Archive for discussions in August

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

edit

Twitter isn't a reliable source and it's entirely undue to mention someone on twitter contradicting the widely report as factual police statement as if the police statement is false. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Twitter isn't a reliable source" Yes it is when it is used to cite from somebody who is considered a reliable source on here and verified, see here (I think "subject matter expert" applies here). Granted he is not a blue check for reasons due to it's new owner but you can reasonably identify him as the owner of the account.
Undue? Maybe, but given the fact they are cited as the source for everything on far right pages on here I would disagree. No point in arguing this though because I will waste my time on talk pages if I do. Tweedle (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
On here being Wikipedia? Just because people spam a source on Wikipedia doesn't improve it's authority. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes "on here" being Wikipedia, where else would I mean? You can look through half a dozen of these discussions here on said group. Tweedle (talk) 09:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
You think a tweet from someone who supposedly heads a group that is listed as 'no consensus' for it's reliability on Wikipedia has enough weight to justify writing a sentence that implies the widely reported police statement is incorrect? Traumnovelle (talk) 09:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
"reliablity can be used on a case by case basis" The way the sentence is specifically worded is not my particular bother, I added it for extra info and people can then tweak it to what they like. I think they should be included as secondary opinion on this matter, but again I am not even challenging this anymore so why are you even here lol Tweedle (talk) 09:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Would you please consider adding the labels "Male" and "Female" to some of your charts?

edit

Hi!

Looking at   I notice it doesn't say which column is for Male and which is for Female. Those labels are missing from a few other of your chars as well. It would be very nice if you could add those labels to avoid confusion.


Regards,

 Algotr (talk) 13:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply