Tweedle
{{NoACEMM}}
Archives:
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Reliable sources
editTwitter isn't a reliable source and it's entirely undue to mention someone on twitter contradicting the widely report as factual police statement as if the police statement is false. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- "Twitter isn't a reliable source" Yes it is when it is used to cite from somebody who is considered a reliable source on here and verified, see here (I think "subject matter expert" applies here). Granted he is not a blue check for reasons due to it's new owner but you can reasonably identify him as the owner of the account.
- Undue? Maybe, but given the fact they are cited as the source for everything on far right pages on here I would disagree. No point in arguing this though because I will waste my time on talk pages if I do. Tweedle (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- On here being Wikipedia? Just because people spam a source on Wikipedia doesn't improve it's authority. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes "on here" being Wikipedia, where else would I mean? You can look through half a dozen of these discussions here on said group. Tweedle (talk) 09:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- You think a tweet from someone who supposedly heads a group that is listed as 'no consensus' for it's reliability on Wikipedia has enough weight to justify writing a sentence that implies the widely reported police statement is incorrect? Traumnovelle (talk) 09:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- "reliablity can be used on a case by case basis" The way the sentence is specifically worded is not my particular bother, I added it for extra info and people can then tweak it to what they like. I think they should be included as secondary opinion on this matter, but again I am not even challenging this anymore so why are you even here lol Tweedle (talk) 09:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- You think a tweet from someone who supposedly heads a group that is listed as 'no consensus' for it's reliability on Wikipedia has enough weight to justify writing a sentence that implies the widely reported police statement is incorrect? Traumnovelle (talk) 09:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes "on here" being Wikipedia, where else would I mean? You can look through half a dozen of these discussions here on said group. Tweedle (talk) 09:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- On here being Wikipedia? Just because people spam a source on Wikipedia doesn't improve it's authority. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Would you please consider adding the labels "Male" and "Female" to some of your charts?
editHi!
Looking at I notice it doesn't say which column is for Male and which is for Female. Those labels are missing from a few other of your chars as well. It would be very nice if you could add those labels to avoid confusion.
Regards,
Algotr (talk) 13:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)