AfC notification: Draft:Khadak (2022) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Khadak (2022). Thanks! Onmyway22 talk 12:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Have updated the production details about movie Talkies10 (talk) 15:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khadak (2022) has been accepted

edit
 
Khadak (2022), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onmyway22 talk 06:38, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you :) Talkies10 (talk) 15:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prarthana (2018 film) (July 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 19:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Here is the detail of Prabhakara KL [1] he has done debut movie has not got any awards many local sources has reviews about movie which i have already attached from archive Talkies10 (talk) 02:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Talkies10! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 19:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Payal Radhakrishna (July 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Not only passing reference she has individual significant coverage [2][3][4][5][6][7] and many more references actor is eligible under WP:ACTOR please have a look. Talkies10 (talk) 09:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Payal Radhakrishna (July 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Have re written the draft and submited Talkies10 (talk) 10:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prarthana (2018 film) (July 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onmyway22 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onmyway22 talk 16:36, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prarthana (2018 film) (August 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Onmyway22 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Do not resubmit until the article without major mandatory changes that previous reviewers commented
Onmyway22 talk 04:59, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for ur response I am deleting the draft Talkies10 (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Payal Radhakrishna (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Vijayclicker93 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vijayclicker93. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DatGuyTalkContribs 13:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talkies10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have only one account now i am not using any other account or editing random i have lost passwords of my previous accounts so using this new account request you to unblock by account i dont have any other accounts with me now Talkies10 (talk) 03:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Even assuming this is true, the pathway forward here is for you to refrain from editing for six months(the standard offer) to demonstrate you can abide by Wikipedia guidelines. At that time, you will need to list all the previous accounts you have used, and explain why you didn't identify them as successors to an old account to which you lost your password. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At that time i didnt had idea about wikipedia guidelines and i had not given any mail id to recover passwords now i am keeping only this account thats all i dont have any other accounts other then this request you to kindly help i wont repeat the sock puppet again..Talkies10 (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply