RustyPete12
Welcome!
edit
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Writing.Com
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Writing.Com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 17:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to BioShock (series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. I am a violinist ♫ talk to me here! 12:19, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In particular, please be aware of the rules regarding the use of italics: the names of films, television shows, books and ships, for example, should always be italicized, not placed in quotation marks. AtticusX (talk) 05:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Edits to Robot
editHi
I have just undone your edits on the Robot page. It is the Robotics project's most important page and so has to be kept in pristeen condition. I can see that you were trying to improve the article by removing the "we" statements and would like to help you improve those changes by helping you see why they were perhaps better approached by examples.
First of all it is definitely not ok to Americanise statements made in English spelling. Changing "civilisation" to "civilization" is unacceptable as the MoS states that the first used or most used should be applied and stuck to. I have come across many articles where there was a 50/50 split and sticking to the first used is always best practice in those cases.
The sentences which have "we" can be greatly cut down in size:-
your edit - "Since then, people have seen robots finally reach a more true assimilation of all technologies to produce robots such as ASIMO,"
I suggest - "Since then robots have reached a more complete assimilation of technologies producing robots such as ASIMO"
your edit - "As mechanical techniques developed through the Industrial age, people found more practical applications, such as Nikola Tesla in 1898, who designed a radio-controlled torpedo and the Westinghouse Electric Corporation creation Televox in 1926."
I suggest - "As mechanical techniques developed through the Industrial age more practical applications were found, including Nikola Tesla in 1898 who designed a radio-controlled torpedo and Televox created by the Westinghouse Electric Corporation in 1926."
Commas are commonly misunderstood. Many people use speech as their basis for punctuation and commas are placed where breathing would occur. Many of these are unecessary and technically incorrect. There is much help to be found on these matters of punctuation and Mos and general editing style at the Guidld of Copy Editors pages Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
I think you are a good candidate for membership if you have not already joined. Many of the people there can help you and advise on how MoS affects work. There are also prose exercises designed to help you improve your editing skills, many of which I found to be a great help.
I hope to see you there :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi
edit- Are you the same RustyPete12 from Wikia? If you are can you please revert a vandal's edit on my userpage there. I am banned on Wikia cross-wiki so can you please do it? Thx... Slipknot Darkrai (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Kore Gang, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chihuahua and Sadist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:54, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Kore Gang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overseer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 5
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Night Film: A Novel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lows Lake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, RustyPete12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit Hello, RustyPete12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, RustyPete12. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, RustyPete12. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Catnapped! for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catnapped!, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catnapped! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)