Peter Napkin Dance Party

Be civil, don't be a dick.

Humanzee

Good spot, that was nonsense! Fences and windows (talk) 21:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks dude. I agree!!!Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 13:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Talk:Kanye. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 16:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not leave silly warnings on users talk pages as you did to user:Peter_Napkin_Dance_Party. The discussion page redirecting to Kanye West while the article itself was a disamig page. Please look before you leap. I expect an apology on my own talk page or this will be taken to the administrator's notice board. Thank you. Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 17:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I never touched user:Peter_Napkin_Dance_Party. If you meant User talk:Peter Napkin Dance Party, why shouldn't a disambig page like Kanye have an associated talk page?   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Why did you blank Talk:Kanye?   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Please take a look at how it use to be. Talk:Kanye was a redirect to the article on Kanye West, I removed that redirect so that the talk page for Kanye did not redirect to another article. I am still waiting for my apology. Thank you. Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 20:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks dude :) :) :) Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 02:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Complaint

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to Talk:Crab louse. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Regards, Gaelen S.^{Talk • Contribs} 03:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

(Note, not a personal attack, but rather a overreaction by this wannabe administrator. Person that was responded to hasn't been on Wikipedia for a long time. Regardless, being the charitable chap that I am, I fixed the tone of the comment to make it less personal) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk • contribs)

::::Now that is an attack, and you need to stop. Enigma^msg 21:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

(Note, no it isn't, but rather an explanation for a silly comment.)

Just saying...

Sorry if you thought that was spam, I was just replying to your post on the other talk page.Abce2|This isnot a test 00:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Dog sex

An ANI was raised against User:Ckatz, the admin who was reverting the change. This problem came up and there is now an ANI within an ANI!

• Reverting Aurora (astronomy) cited material[1]
• Dog sex reversion behaviour[2]

HarryAlffa (talk) 15:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Dildo Arm

Thanks! I really don't know anything more about this, I was reading about Paleo-Eskimos and wound up there. I just saw that the Arm was part of the Bay and redirected it there, I have no idea how it got its name.--Cúchullain ^t/c 17:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Master Editor

Requirements:

• 40,000 edits
• 5 years' service

File:Animalibrí.gif

I see about 1.1% of that....[3] --King Öomie 21:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

I read that this is one award that is intended to be given to yourself, so I thought I could give it to myself irregardless of the suggested requirements. Thanks for checking up on me. Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Common misconception. The intended reading is, "Once you reach the requirements, you don't need to wait for someone else to notice- you can just add it yourself." And I'll think you'll find that the word "suggested" isn't on that page at all. Also, in the spirit of checking up, WP:VAND outlines the full extent of edits that can be categorized as 'vandalism'. Attaching that label to anything would be, well, silly- and some people may even see it as a passive-aggressive slap. --King Öomie 16:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing it up. I wasn't trying to be passive-aggressive by adding it, maybe just a bit boastful of my own talents ;0 I added the vandalism warning because the offending editor did more than just removed the misperceived award. Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 19:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

You're not helping your cause here. Enigma^msg 21:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

I have no cause. Peter Napkin Dance Party (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Vandals

While it can be extremely tempting, please don't insert profanity into edit summaries. --King Öomie 19:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)