Jk065no

June 2011

Hello Pconsulting. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 14:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Pconsulting/Penso Consulting Ltd."

A page you created, Pconsulting/Penso Consulting Ltd., has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

• Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
• Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
• Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. v/r - TP 14:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jk065no (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

jk0065no (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I do completely understand the reason for my username block. I apologise for any problems I might caused. This was my first contact with Wikipedia and my first article that I wanted to write for the company. It was the part of my internship project. I do realise that it might be perceived as promotional information which I did not intend to do. Therefore, I wanted to submit it firstly for peer review and verify whether is reliable or not. I would be very grateful for unblocking my username. I learned lessons and understand what the implication of wrong use of Wikipedia is. I would like to ensure you that I will comply with all rules and policies from now on. I would like to learn more and be able to participate in the Wikipedia`s development not only for my personal development but also for the benefits of other users, for instance, use my knowledge and help editing articles. I would really appreciate unblocking my username.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately nothing you say indicates that you will edit other than with a conflict of interest. You refer to the "article that [you] wanted to write for the company", but writing for the company you work for is not acceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

JamesBWatson: I have a good faith regarding my contribution to the site. This is why I put "lessons learned". I won`t write again a content that violate Wikipedia`s restrictions. I don`t understand why you cannot give a second chance to person who didn`t do anything on purpose. I admit I should have firstly familiarised myself with all the rules here. I haven`t done so unfortunately. Do you need still penalise me for one mistake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.45.199.85 (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

It's not a question of "penalising" you, and I do not doubt at all that you were acting in good faith. My reason for declining the unblock request is, as I said, that you have given no indication that you intend to do anything other than edit on behalf of a company. If you can give an assurance that you will not do so then you are welcome to make another unblock request. If so, make sure you have read and understood the instructions in the block notice. Two other points about making a further unblock request: (1) having declined one unblock request I will not assess another one, but will leave it to another administrator, so that you can have the benefit of an independent opinion, rather than mine again. (2) Any request for an unblock should be made on this page from this account. You should not edit on any other page by not logging in or by using another account as long as this account is blocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your response! I will definetely do as you sugessted and ask again for unblock.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jk065no (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

jk0065no (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I read all relveant policies, especially, COI and I understand what I can and cannot publish and do. I am commited to obey all rules on Wikipedia. There are four reasons to reject unblocking ("WP:BP", "WP:BLOCK"). Now, I am not falling under each of them. I will not anymore write on behalf of this or any other company. None of my contribution will relate to the organisation Im working at. I will disclosure my relation to the company on user space as soon as I ll be unblocked. Also, I will request for an article to be written by a third party, which will have neutral point of view. I will provide all necessary reliable sources so to verify the importance of putting information about the company on Wikipedia. I commit to possitively contribute to Wikipedia by improvimg existing articles on Wikiprojects: Business as well as help authors of new articles on community portal. Please consider my request possitively.

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. -- Atama頭 18:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)