OxymoronNBG
Archives
|
Darko Miličić
editOK, I agree. The last part of the WP:SPORTSTRANS clearly confirm your claims. I've reverted edits not knowing that player's statement (FA player) or team official statement can be official enough to be placed on en.wiki.x.io; Thank you for drawing my attention to this. Bye! (p.s. Use English for eventual 3rd-person involvement - generally speaking) --AirWolf talk 22:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Serbia national basketball team - Discussion
editHi. Although many other contributors gave their opinion long ago, please, if you are willing, do so yourself here: Final disscussion: Results/medals history. Thanks!--AirWolf talk 14:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Ćao! I agree with the consensus reached. SFRY should be treated as the successor state to the KSHS–KY, but the FRY–SUSM shouldn't be treated as a successor state to the SFRY. Likewise, Serbia shouldn't be treated as a sole successor to the federation it comprised with Montenegro, but both countries should be regarded as successors to their pre-WWI counterparts. Since the agreement has been reached long ago, I don't feel there's a need to repeat it at the talk page, but will support this point of view if there are any new developments regarding the issue. --OxymoronNBG (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'll announce you once I start editing this article, per consensus reached, so we don't have edit warring with the IP-s. It won't be a close date, but surely before the start of Euro 2015. Consensus is reached, what we now need is to implement it. Until then, keep reverting just like you did recently. The point is, it shouldn't be raw, like one user did. I'll re-update Yugoslav national team and start new FR Yugoslavian team, once again, per consensus. Also, if you are willing, start same discussions for other Serbia-related national teams (volleyball, waterpolo etc.); I do think that it is the same situation there, prove me wrong if not. Consensus for pre-1992 results is well accepted for any Serbia-related sport. Now what we should do is to go even further, to make a final push for the consensus of 1992–2006 period in other sports. Thanks!--AirWolf talk 21:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Serbia national basketball team - Roster
editHi. Like i said check the other national team wiki pages everywhere is like i put it. Why do you need the roster from last year, this is the most fresh roster and its fully reliable because its put up from the official eurobasket 2015 cite. I dont see wheres the problem? --19999o (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that "everybody's doing it!" isn't a valid explanation for anything, and that there should always remain one valid complete 12-men roster on the national team page. A preliminary roster can be added as an addendum, but not remain as the sole roster on the page. --OxymoronNBG (talk) 09:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
editHello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, OxymoronNBG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:KK Crvena zvezda Telekom Logo.png
editThanks for uploading File:KK Crvena zvezda Telekom Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, OxymoronNBG. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:KK Mega Vizura Logo 2014.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:KK Mega Vizura Logo 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)