User talk:MusikAnimal/Archive 33

Latest comment: 8 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Challenge Series
Archive 30Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35Archive 40

Thanks

I was busy looking for the correct template and you beat me to it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Hehe, I just copied it from an older AfD! Thanks for taking care of that, I was on the fence about doing the same MusikAnimal talk 20:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
G4 was actually a tiny bit of a stretch - it was 90% copy and 10% "new" - but combined with the other factors I think deletion was what was in the cards anyway. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
My thoughts exactly :) MusikAnimal talk 20:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Sun October 16: CommonsLab / Open House NY Photo Contest + Hackathon

Sunday October 16, 2pm: CommonsLab / Open House NY Photo Contest + Hackathon
 
 

On Sunday, October 16, Wikimedia NYC will host a multimedia tutorial, workshop, and hackathon focused on Wikimedia Commons and the work processes for cultural multimedia wiki-projects.

The CommonsLab is the concluding "upload party" to the Wikipedia @ Open House New York Weekend photo scavenger hunt, and an accompanying Wikimedia Commons multimedia hackathon.

The event will take the form of a modified unconference, with sessions for photographers/creatives, editors/writers and hackers/software folks!

2:00pm - 8:00 pm at NYU ITP, Tisch School of Arts, 721 Broadway, 4th Floor

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

And RSVP now for our next event after this, focusing on Latin American art and artists:

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Editing News #3—2016

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletterSubscribe or unsubscribe on the English Wikipedia

 
Did you know?

Did you know that you can easily re-arrange columns and rows in the visual editor?

 

Select a cell in the column or row that you want to move. Click the arrow at the start of that row or column to open the dropdown menu (shown). Choose either "Move before" or "Move after" to move the column, or "Move above" or "Move below" to move the row.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving language support.

Recent changes

  • You can now set text as small or big.[1]
  • Invisible templates have been shown as a puzzle icon. Now, the name of the invisible template is displayed next to the puzzle icon.[2] A similar feature will display the first part of hidden HTML comments.[3]
  • Categories are displayed at the bottom of each page. If you click on the categories, the dialog for editing categories will open.[4]
  • At many wikis, you can now add maps to pages. Go to the Insert menu and choose the "Maps" item. The Discovery department are adding more features to this area, like geoshapes. You can read more on MediaWiki.org.[5]
  • The "Save" button now says "Save page" when you create a page, and "Save changes" when you change an existing page.[6] In the future, the "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.
  • Image galleries now use a visual mode for editing. You can see thumbnails of the images, add new files, remove unwanted images, rearrange the images by dragging and dropping, and add captions for each image. Use the "Options" tab to set the gallery's display mode, image sizes, and add a title for the gallery.[7]

Future changes

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10 "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including Thai, Burmese and Aramaic.

The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The 2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.

Let's work together

Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

NOINDEX

The NOINDEX that was rolled out on Thursday is not working. Could someone please address this. Thanks.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

File extensions

Hi MusikAnimal, I posted earlier at EFR about a double-extension filter before we discussed a potential blacklist entry instead. Was wondering if you would be willing to look into the edit request here? Thanks, — Andy W. (talk) 02:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

I've replied there endorsing the request. I know how to add to the blacklist, but it's not my line of work so would prefer to let another admin handle it. There's a very slight chance someone might oppose it since the uploads may be made in good-faith, but I think the accompanying friendly message should alleviate that concern. Best MusikAnimal talk 05:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2016)

 
NASA researchers at Glenn Research Center conducting tests on aircraft engine noise in 1967
Hello, MusikAnimal.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Noise

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Spelling bee • Math rock


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

16:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Bot

Your bot is making a false claim - I have made more than 65 edits by a long shot. MPD (Talk to me!) 14:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Matthew Peter-Davis: Musik's bot reports the number of mainspace edits you've made, which is 65. This site shows a pie chart with what areas your edits were made to. Kind regards -- samtar talk or stalk 14:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Saturday October 22: WikiArte Latin American Edit-a-thon @ MoMA

Saturday October 22, 10am: WikiArte Latin American Edit-a-thon @ MoMA
 
 
 

Join us for a full Saturday of social Wikipedia editing at the Museum of Modern Art (drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Wikipedia articles pertaining to the lives and works of Latin American artists.

The WikiArte (Wiki Arte y Cultura Latinoamerica) edit-a-thon is a global campaign to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Latin American arts and culture and to counter geocultural systemic bias on Wikipedia.

Featuring an opening Artists' Panel at 10am, with Sol Aramendi, Sharon Lee De La Cruz, and Marisa Morán Jahn, to be moderated by Rocío Aranda-Alvarado, curator at El Museo del Barrio.

The Museum of Modern Art and Fundacion Cisneros/Colección Patricia Phelps de Cisneros are uniting with international allies to focus on the lives and works of Latin American artists, architects and designers. With keystone events scheduled for October 22 in New York City and other cities throughout the month (Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Caracas, & others), the campaign aims to further similar goals to Art+Feminism.

All are invited, with no specialized knowledge of the subject or Wikipedia editing experience required. Introductory training on the basics of Wikipedia editing will be given throughout the edit-a-thon. Please bring your laptop and power cord; we will have library resources, WiFi, and a list of suggested topics on hand.

10:00am - 6:00pm at The Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at MoMA, 4 West 54th Street (between 5th and 6th Avenue)
Please note that this entrance is one block north of the main 53rd Street entrance, closer to 5th Avenue

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 23:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Locked out of my account after name change

I saw where you were talking to other users about someone getting locked out of their account after having their username changed. I had my account name changed from user:sbrianhicks to "AtTheNecropolis," and my password no longer works. I talked to another administrator, and he wasn't able to help much. Do you know of anything I can do? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.195.131.129 (talk) 01:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

That user was locked out of their old account, unrelated to the rename. Renaming of your account shouldn't lock you out, though. Are you sure you've tried the same password you used on your original account? I can't promise I can help you, unfortunately :( The process to regain control of an account isn't simple. What happened recently was a rare sequence of events that made it possible. Sorry! MusikAnimal talk 03:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I've used every password I can remember ever using with that account. I'm pretty sure the browser even saved my old account name and password, and that I just had to change the name when logging in. I have no idea what happened. I'll probably just use a new account, but after using the old one for seven years, I thought I'd give saving it one last shot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.196.130.157 (talk) 04:06, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Separate one election page to two articles as usual

Hi, administrator MusikAnimal, I separated the article Taiwan general election, 2016 to Taiwan presidential election, 2016 and Taiwan legislative election, 2016 as you can see the common practices in the past in {{Taiwanese elections}}. I noticed your account user:MusikBot fixed the protection setting to the two new pages. Wish you can extend the protection for the original page to the new ones and I wonder if you can move the edit history to both pages? Thanks! --Wildcursive (talk) 11:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Edit filter question

Regarding [[Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested/Archive 8#Category:<nationality> inventions]], the filter does not seem to be preventing the sort of edits that it's supposed to catch, as several more of the user's sockpuppets have been identified making exactly the same edits (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Filipz123). Is the filter turned on? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

@Ivanvector: The filter is only targeting the IP ranges, not accounts. Including any unconfirmed user will increase the likelihood of false positives, so we'll have to first put it into log-only mode and monitor it for a while. I'll keep you updated MusikAnimal talk 19:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2016)

 
The attic at a factory
Hello, MusikAnimal.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Attic

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Noise • Spelling bee


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations!!!!

Congratulations to our new CU!!! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to to the funtionaries Musik! — xaosflux Talk 04:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! :) MusikAnimal talk 05:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

OMG, my favorite NYC techie is now a CU. That considerably widens the areas in which I can pester you. Congratulations!--Bbb23 (talk) 12:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations MA! You deserve it. Patient Zerotalk 15:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Just chiming in to add my congrats. This just adds to your value as an awesome Wikipedian. MarnetteD|Talk 17:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
I gave you a congratulations on IRC, but incase you didn't get it.. Well.. Here's a haiku

You'll receive CheckUser soon
  Hooray!

That haiku took a long time to think of. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

New page reviewers

Hi MusikAnimal, the RfC on new pages patrol is closed in favor of this new group, (phab:T149019). Don't know when this rolls out, but just an FYI for MusikBot. :) — Andy W. (talk) 00:12, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

All set! Thank you MusikAnimal talk 17:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

NPP - Last call for work group comments on stage 1

Hi MusikAnimal,

The future of NPP and AfC:

To take full advantage of the WMF developer time that has been allocated to this project, we must now quickly submit the short list of our priorities before the end of October, otherwise we may lose the attention of the WMF.
If you have not already done so, please visit the page at Suggested Improvements and select your personal choice of 10 features (excluding the ones the devs are already doing) and list them in your order of priority at Priorities.

Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Bot Issue

Hello MusikAnimal. Sorry, no time for a haiku from my little snug Hungarian hotel. Anyways, see [14]. I don't want to disable the task as it is only one edit, but the user definitely didn't have his account for one day. Might be worth checking out. Cheers, --Dat GuyTalkContribs 18:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

I've run into this issue ([15]) before, thanks for explaining it! Always wondered why Wikimedia Commons had an issue reading my account age...Garchy (talk) 19:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
@Garchy: Yep, nothing to worry about. In fact, you should be proud of it! Do you recall what year you actually registered? Just curious, because my first account has a registration date of June 2006, before you made your first edit. Anyway, the bug with MusikBot is fixed! Thanks MusikAnimal talk 19:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
(tps) It's in the first log entry[16] :) -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
You found the log quicker than I could - looks like it was 30 September 2005, which would make sense based on where I was in school at that time! I didn't start editing (slowly at first) until around 2007. Garchy (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Re: Twinkle feature request

I never remembered to respond here, but your latest conceptualization is basically exactly what I'm looking for. It would immensely help with my workflow at TfD. Please let me know whenever you (or someone else) makes this happen. Thanks! ~ Rob13Talk 23:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi MusikAnimal, I was just reviewing my talk page and I realized that I have not yet finished the follow-up on the gawker-labs copyright violation issue that we had a month or so ago. I believe that I may have left a link in the now deleted talk page discussion to a page where it appeared that they had violated Wikipedia copyright policy. This now deleted discussion was at: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Hillary_Clinton_brain_damage_rumor#Questioned_deletion. I'm trying to verify that gawker-labs has been taken care of properly by legal. Is there any chance you could go back to that now deleted talk page and either give me the link to the gawker-labs page in question, or else verify for yoursel that gawker-labs,has now taken down their page, and let me know? Thanks, Scott P. (talk) 17:25, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

@Scottperry: The link shows a message that the application is currently down for maintenance. Being a Ruby developer, I can tell you that is the default Ruby on Rails message for when an application goes offline. That means it probably isn't actually down for "maintenance", rather the app died and no one has bother to revive it, perhaps intentionally. Hope this helps MusikAnimal talk 19:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks kindly for the update. Perhaps legal took care of it. I think you're probably correct. They were crawled approximately 8 times by archive.org, before they were reported to legal and always were up. Now they're down, apparently for the long term. Scott P. (talk) 22:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2016)

 
Street food vendors at a roadside market just outside of Hua Hin District, Thailand
Hello, MusikAnimal.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Street food

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Attic • Noise


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

MoreMenus

Your MoreMenus script gives the following in my console: This page is using the deprecated ResourceLoader module "jquery.jStorage". Please use "mediawiki.storage" instead. --TerraCodes (talk to me) 04:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, it's on the to-dos, just haven't gotten around to it yet. The warnings are non-critical and may be ignored MusikAnimal talk 18:10, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
This should be   Fixed [17]. I still see the warning in the console, so I'm assuming it's a different gadget MusikAnimal talk 07:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

NPR's

Did you finish processing the PERM backlog? I did all the grandfathers and activated your bot config page. — xaosflux Talk 23:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: Yep! We should be all set :) MusikAnimal talk 23:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for adding the permission to my account :D --Cameron11598 (Talk) 03:59, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

PERM

I have had your PERM helper script installed on my user:Kudpung/vector.js page for several months but I have never been able to get it to work. Am I missing something? Is there something incompatible with Firefox on MacOS? The instructions you provide do not appear to say where the buttons are or what to look for. One of what I thought was a button for it tried to install autopatrolled on user:Example. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

(tpw) @Kudpung: When you are editing a PERM subpage such as this one it should show up in the sidebar before the "new pages" header. See https://i.imgur.com/7jpfEQx.png - NQ (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
@Kudpung: There is also User:MusikAnimal/userRightsManager.js which “Allows you to assign the permission, mark the discussion as done with optional closing remarks, and issue the corresponding user rights template on the user's talk page.” After installing the script by adding importScript('User:MusikAnimal/userRightsManager.js'); to your vector.js, clicking on the “assign permissions” link on a PERM page will open up a much better interface to manage user rights rather than having to go to Special:UserRights and then notifying the user manually. - NQ (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Yes, thanks NQ! I think Kudpung probably meant userRightsManager. Documentation for that script is long overdue :) But I want to improve it and make it work outside PERM first. Also, if a situation arises where you don't want to use the script, you can right-click on "assign permissions" then "Open in a new tab", and it will bypass the script. Best MusikAnimal talk 18:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Kudpung does not have the userRightsManager script installed yet. Btw you should "really" advertise your awesome scripts, I count only 7 admins using the rights manager atm. As an aside, I couldn't figure out how or where userRightsManager.js worked at first. Finally took a peek at the script and had to force display the 'sysop-show' class. - NQ (talk) 18:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks everyone. I now have it working. It's actually quite awesome, but it does need to be better advertised and the documentation needs to be improved - computer programmers tend to forget that software users are not software designers - we don't need to know what's under the hood (bonnet?) ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I do have documentation for responseHelper, but I suppose it could use a screenshot MusikAnimal talk 19:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Also, the scripts are advertised at WP:ADMINTOOLS. I don't think they're in Wikipedia:User scripts but that page links to the admin tools page MusikAnimal talk 19:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
The confusion here is between User:MusikAnimal/responseHelper and User:MusikAnimal/userRightsManager.js. Also, only new admins will read WP:ADMINTOOLS I haven't been near that page for 7 years! We shoud introduce a philosophy that all admins regularly get a newsletter about all new updates to policies, guidelines, and software, etc. that affects them - it's been on my to do list for years but I can't do everything.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

I like the idea of an admin newsletter! That would have covered things like extended confirmed protection, and when new user groups like New Page Reviewer are introduced. That is a lot of work and we'd need to define a whole process for it. The "portal" for the newsletter I think would live in WP:ADMINGUIDE with all the other admin stuff, and we could show the most recent edition of the newsletter right there on the home page. We'd also post the newsletter at WP:AN. Just thinking aloud. I also don't have time for this, but for the record I put together WP:ADMINGUIDE (used to be Wikipedia:New admin school), and ADMINTOOLS is one of the new things. So it wasn't there 7 years ago :) MusikAnimal talk 19:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

See? I didn't even know that New Admin School had been deprecated and replaced. Thanks for doing that. For the newsletter, it's not as complicated as that. Someone just needs to create the mass message sender page from the list of current admins (and update it at each new promotion), and just a small team (me and someone else?) could stay on the ball and write and send a pretty newsletter as and when required. It should include notes about recent ArbCom closures, new polices/guidelines (and deprecations), especially new CSD criteria etc), current RfC about stuff affecting admins, current RfA, new promotions to admin (and 'crat), and desysopings. I'll start the newsletter project page in a few moments. I think it's important in the light of a couple of recent serious blunders made (in GF, however) by recent new admins. We can't always rely on Signpost for reporting new things, besides which, Signpost is now in difficulty itself and is now only being published every 2 weeksKudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
A mass message list appears to have been recently created and is regularly maintained by Xaosflux. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators/Message list isn't "perfect" but should work for most purposes - it was originally made for sending "infrequent" updates (has only been used to send out the ECProtection policy changes so far). "Official" policy announcements, etc should always be posted to WP:AN as well. I suggest that notices include a "discuss this" link that goes somewhere. — xaosflux Talk 23:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
 

Greetings, all!

We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time.

The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring.

Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.

Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. We apologize for the delay in sending out this message until after the competition has started. Thank you to Krishna Chaitanya Velaga for aiding in getting this message out.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Technical Barnstar
Thanks for working to improve the software related to new pages patrolling -- and for MoreMenu, which has saved me hours of link juggling! Esquivalience (talk) 02:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposal to add SBL to ABH

Hi Musik, there aren't many of us abuse-filter-helpers, but I've proposed adding SBL-log reading - your comments at meta:Talk:Abuse_filter_helpers are welcome. — xaosflux Talk 15:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

Advice

Hello, I was hoping you could provide your viewpoint: I've been having editing conflicts with an editor - in an attempt to get a third opinion I accidentally posted to ANI (my intention was not admin intervention but other editors viewpoints). This ANI was closed as "ANI not the correct method" - however, this editor posted the ANI notice to the Talk page of the project anyway, even though it is not relevant - I feel as the editor is only doing this with bad faith in mind. What can be done? Is it possible for me to remove this link as it is irrelevant and I feel the editor is only using it to make me look bad? Your advice as an admin and experienced user is appreciated - P.S. Hope you're having a great time in Bermuda! - Diff [24] Garchy (talk) 13:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

After having some time to cool down I've decided to just let it go - still hope you're having a great time! Garchy (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer

Hi. By creating Category:Wikipedia new page reviewers yuappear to have inadvertantly informed 1,400 former patrollers including inactive, blocked, banned users, and trolls, that they now have the new New Page Reviewer right. As you are away for the next few days days. I will summarily delete this cat without a CfD, because I now need to start over with according the rights to the grandfathred group. You will need to create a bot to remove what this cat has done. We all make mistakes, but I'm the one who seems to be doing most of the unpaid leg work and I'm beginning to need some sleep and I also have to go into hospital tomorrow for an operation on my other eye and I'll be out of actin for several days. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: You are mistaken. Perhaps you have this confused with Category:Wikipedian new page patrollers? The category I created was empty, and is populated by Template:User wikipedia/New page reviewer. Anyone you see there has added the userbox or manually added themselves to the category, since the new user group was deployed. I do not know what you mean in saying the former patrollers were "notified". Categories do not by themselves do anything that would require clean up. In all kindness, I'd appreciate if you first consult me before deleting pages I create, and moreover, not assume there was an error. Also, you are volunteer and no one is making you do any leg work. Take a break if needed! The wiki will be just fine. Now, I need to get back to my break :) Wishing you a speedy recovery from your operation MusikAnimal talk 14:31, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Yu obviously restored that cat before readng what I posted above. You've effectively notified around 900 of the 1400 former, now non-patrollers, trolls, and blocked and banned users that they are New age Reviewers. The cat would have been needed but not until the grandfathered rights and applicatons at PERM have been processed. PLease empty the cat and run a bot to remove the userboxes it created. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: Wow, no edit conflict! Please read my reply. There are 26 users in the category, and they manually added the userbox or themselves to the category (not my doing). This naming and connection with userbox is consistent with the way we're doing it for other permissions. Categories do not create userboxes nor do they notify anyone... I'm confused what has led you to believe this. It is the other way around. The userboxes add the user to the category MusikAnimal talk 14:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
I should make it clear that this category has a direct conenction to the userbox and topicon. Just because some one is in this category does not mean they actually have the right. The same is true with Category:Wikipedia rollbackers, etc. Please don't confuse the category as something official. It's just a category... MusikAnimal talk 14:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

MusikAnimal I don't know if this might be a bug/glitch, but when I marked Talk:Cynthia Barnett as patrolled, I get access to "New Pages feed" for the regular and Page Curation version. Is this normal even after New Page Reviewer right was introduced? — JudeccaXIII (talk) 03:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

@JudeccaXIII:This is because they haven't pushed out the patch that will take away the "patroller" right from the autoconfirmed and extended confirmed user groups yet. See here for more info. Yoshi24517Chat Online 04:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2016)

 
A sword dance performance
Hello, MusikAnimal.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Sword dance

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Street food • Attic


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

A message from Kreymann

Hi, curious why my edits to The Merry Widow were deleted? Did I break a rule? Kreymann (talk) 03:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

No, my revert was a mistake, and I immediately undid it. Sorry about that! MusikAnimal talk 15:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Oh, thank you! Kreymann (talk) 18:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

William Howard Taft

Did you mean to remove the semi-protection instead the indef move-protection? © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 02:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

@Tbhotch: Whoops... I wish I had caught that sooner! In general we always keep TFA open, I only semi'd it originally not realizing it was TFA. So yes I messed up there... :( TFA period is over now, anyway. Thanks for letting me know! MusikAnimal talk 02:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Response helper at UAA

Wish I was in Bermuda. Hope you are having a good time, this can obviously wait till you're back.

I was curious if there was any way to integrate response helper with the block buttons at UAA. What I mean is, an admin would select the type of block they wanted to issue from the existing choices, and the block would be made with the proper log entry and the user's talk page would be tagged with the appropriate lock notice. I know Twinkle can do this, but not directly from the UAA interface. (I did ask over at WT:TWINKLE as well but I notice a lot of questions there don't get replied to and the last time I asked for a new feature they basically told me my idea was dumb, which is funny because we now have the "notify" feature at PERM, whic is exactly what I had asked them for.) Beeblebrox (talk) 03:24, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: Hey! Sorry for the late reply. This can be done, and I had given it thought before. Basically, anywhere there's a block button, it would open up the Twinkle module. It's a cool idea but might not be welcomed by some. Maybe I could make default-on, so that people know about it, and have an option to permanently disable it in case they find it annoying. What do you think? MusikAnimal talk 01:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Sounds good to me, Beeblebrox (talk) 03:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

PC-protection for Wildfire

This month, just one IP vandalized the page. Is this enough to justify extension? --George Ho (talk) 04:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

A message from 88.172.133.187

The change I made to Ines de Bourgoin was based on the extensive (and abundantly referenced) discussion in the page about her husband; could have propagated some of those, sure, but they are to books I don't have access to and as an academic I frown upon second hand references ;-) 88.172.133.187 (talk) 08:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Saturday November 12: Women in Science Edit-a-thon @ NY Academy of Sciences (plus Sunday Indigenous People's Justice event)

Saturday November 12, 12-4pm: Women in Science Edit-a-thon @ NY Academy of Sciences
 
 

Join us for a full Saturday of social Wikipedia editing at NY Academy of Sciences (drop-in any time!), during which we will create, update, and improve Wikipedia articles covering Women in science for their second annual edit-a-thon!.

This event also coincides with the year-long celebration of the Academy's 200th Anniversary and a Women in Red online campaign.

Beginning and experienced Wikipedia writers are both welcome, and there will be helpers on hand to assist those new to editing the encyclopedia.

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 19:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

And RSVP now for our other event this Sunday in Brooklyn, focusing on Indigenous communities and social justice:

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Ijon

Hi MusikAnimal. This account was global-locked for a time earlier. Please see the block log and the talk page message immediately above yours. -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:12, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Dah, thank you! Sorry, I was not aware MusikAnimal talk 00:15, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Stephen Tharp

Hello! I wish you a wonderful weekend, and a speedy recovery or long rejoice from the election on Tuesday. First of all, I just want to thank you for all the work you do here on Wikipedia. It is truly appreciated.

Is there any possibility that you could turn Draft:Stephen Tharp, which I created, into a fully-fledged Stephen Tharp? Someone else created Stephen Tharp numerous times to much chagrin of another editor and administrator who deleted it, eventually to the point where he allowed only administrators to create the page. (Excuse my rudimentary explanation. A better one might be written on Draft talk:Stephen Tharp.) I asked the original administrator to take a look about half a year ago, and he has never gotten back, so I have gone on to the next person who seems to know a thing or two about music.

Let me know if you can do this. I am just an editor hoping to spread classical music throughout the internet... Thank you very much!

Damibaru (talk) 04:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

  Done I would say this is very much ready for the mainspace. The older versions were either promotional or outright copyright violations. Yours is wonderfully crafted and adheres to all inclusion criteria, as far as I can tell. Excellent work, Damibaru! MusikAnimal talk 06:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
PS – I see you are in the NYC region as I am. You should join us at a few meetups! See Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC for more info, and consider joining WikiProject New York City in our efforts to improve related subjects across the encyclopedia. Regards MusikAnimal talk 06:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
@MusikAnimal: Thank you for your record settingly-swift response. Yes, I wish I could make it to some meetups. Alas, my schedule is very busy, and I have an hour and a half of a too-expensive bus ride. I consider myself part of the greater-NYC area geographically, but certainly not in terms of time it takes to get there... :-( One day for sure! Thank you very much! Damibaru (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Technical Barnstar
Well done on the Massviews tool. Working amazingly well. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
My pleasure! I look forward to improving it even more :) Regards, MusikAnimal talk 19:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Any chance we could increase the max number to 12,500? That would allow me to calculate monthly viewership. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
@Doc James: I was just talking to Nuria on the Analytics team... as far as the API goes there's basically nothing stopping how many pages we process. We could remove the limit altogether. The issue is the calculations happen on the client-side, so if you ran a query for say, 50,000 pages, it could consume a lot of your computer's memory! So I'm going to look into ways to intelligently determine what the browser can handle. E.g. on mobile the limit will be lower, etc. For now I will up to 20,000 as I think that's mostly safe to do :) I'll let you know when it's deployed. Best MusikAnimal talk 20:26, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Perfect thanks :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
@Doc James: Done! The cap has been increased to 20,000. There's no performance safeguards in place yet... so if your computer goes a little slow while you're doing running a query, you know why :) Best MusikAnimal talk 05:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Bot Question

Greetings, your bot is mistaken about this particular correction. Can I just revert it, or will it keep repeating the "fix"? Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

@VQuakr: I'll double check the logic, but I'm inclined to not blame the bot on this one... Once things started to get weird [33], the bot correctly stopped processing the page becuase it couldn't parse it [34]. Then you made this edit which fixed the parsing issue but for obvious reasons still confused the bot. I see you made another edit right afterward [35] that apparently didn't cause an edit conflict with the bot... That's the part I'm not sure about. It should handle edit conflicts. Anyway, I can see you were trying to repair the mess Valenciano made here. Valenciano, I know you didn't mean to, but how on earth did that happen? Substitution I don't think would have done this, did you copy the template source directly? Either way it should all be fixed now :) MusikAnimal talk 19:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure what happened with that one. When I originally tried, it came up like this
Yeah, this wasn't really a "hey, stop your bot" message so much as asking your advice on fixing the situation. Glad to see it's taken care of now. VQuakr (talk) 21:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

[[User:{{subst:Valenciano}}]]

  • [[User:{{subst:Valenciano}}|{{subst:Valenciano}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:Valenciano}}|t]] · [[Special:History/User talk:{{subst:Valenciano}}|th]] · [[Special:Contribs/{{subst:Valenciano}}|c]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{subst:Valenciano}}|del]] · [[:luxo:{{subst:Valenciano}}|cross-wiki]] · [[Special:CentralAuth/{{subst:Valenciano}}|SUL]] · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · [[WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{subst:Valenciano}}|rfar]] · [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/{{subst:Valenciano}}|spi]] · [[WP:Contributor copyright investigations/{{subst:Valenciano}}|cci]]) ([[Special:UserRights/{{subst:Valenciano}}|assign permissions]])(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)
test Valenciano (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
I then copied another user's template and that looked fine, but obviously wasn't. Kudpung then informed me of it, I went back and fixed it (or so I thought) to this version which looked fine. I can only apologise if this has created a mess :( Valenciano (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
I think you did something different... the entire source of the template was included [36]. But no worries... we've got it fixed. Next time use the "Add request" button! :) MusikAnimal talk 19:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
I did. That's what I'm saying - I originally used the add request, previewed it, and it produced the User:{{subst:Valenciano}}]] mess above, hence I copied another user's request. Valenciano (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Oh, so you added your username where it said {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}. That actually happens a lot, the REVISIONUSER should not be changed as it automatically puts in your username. I'll try to tweak the template to make this more clear. Best MusikAnimal talk 20:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Yes, that's it. It's probably the first time I'd been at PERM. As I say, sorry for the mess. Valenciano (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2016)

 
A woman wearing a dress
Hello, MusikAnimal.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Dress

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Sword dance • Street food


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi MusikAnimal.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Something's up with MusikBot

Your bot archived my request for the New Page Patroller right, when no admin had checked it out and I added it a couple seconds before that. Just wanted to let you know. here's the diff. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Weird... looking into it! MusikAnimal talk 19:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
This should be fixed now :) I guess when I did some refactoring a while back I broke the handling of edit conflicts. Whoops! Surprised it's taken this long to surface (though the above report from 3 days ago is the same issue, I believe) MusikAnimal talk 22:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Pageview bugs

If you use Redirect Views in List view on an all lowercase article title, then that article title is not included as the target in the list.--Penbat (talk) 14:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

In Pageviews Analysis and Redirect Views, "Clear" is only displayed after two article names have been entered but not one.--Penbat (talk) 18:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

In Pageviews Analysis and Redirect Views, you have to do Control V to paste into the article name area, you cannot right click Paste.--Penbat (talk) 18:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

@Penbat: Fixed the first two bugs, the third I cannot reproduce. What is shown is a normal input field, so I'm led to believe the issue is with your browser and not the code. What browser/operating system are you using? Thanks MusikAnimal talk 19:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Third bug only happens if you already have one article name in the field and you want to paste another.--Penbat (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Ah, I see. That may or may not be fixable... but I can look into it. Thanks for the report MusikAnimal talk 19:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Bug 1 still does not seem to work but if u refresh the browser tab link it is then Ok with lowercase initial character converted to uppercase. I am using Firefox.--Penbat (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Looks like if u enter all lower case article name u get a prompt list with initial cap version that works OK if you select it. However if u enter an all lowercase redirect to an article you dont get any prompt list.--Penbat (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
You may need to adjust your search method if you want to search for a redirect. That's available in the Settings panel. However Redirect Views does not provide this option because it only works for target pages – the page that has redirects to it. There may be redirects that have their own redirects (double redirects), but those should be fixed, and here on enwiki at least a bot does it for you. Hope this helps MusikAnimal talk 20:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Just done a bit more testing. It never works initially if you paste in an all lowercase article title or redirect name but if u refresh the link on the browser tab it then converts to initial cap and works OK. Autocomplete is irrelevant if you paste in.--Penbat (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

New page review

I see there are problems with new page reviewing. I have tried to assist but I no longer see "Mark as reviewed" on my screen. Can you help?--Ipigott (talk) 10:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

@Ipigott: The patroller right was removed from the autoconfirmed group, and put in a new group called "new page reviewers". You can apply at WP:PERM/NPR MusikAnimal talk 16:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for responding so quickly. Well that explains why things are piling up. Really strange I wasn't informed? Why has this right been removed? Perhaps you should those responsible that this is causing problems. Probably many more editors are in the same situation as I am. I really don't feel like reapplying under these circumstances. Do you know if any other rights been withdrawn?--Ipigott (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
This change was broadly advertised, but it seems not well enough. Those who patrolled N amount of pages (not sure what the number is) were mass messaged. You seem to have quite a few [40], so I'm not sure why you weren't messaged. More info is at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers and Wikipedia:The future of NPP and AfC. No other relevant rights have been changed lately MusikAnimal talk 19:56, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
I think you more than qualify, so I've granted you the right. Best MusikAnimal talk 19:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for sorting this out. It still seems pretty strange to me that rights can be withdrawn without notification. I'll now be able to get back to helping to reduce the backlog.--Ipigott (talk) 08:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

List of articles by user

Sorry to bother you again but this seems to be down today.--Ipigott (talk) 15:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

The Challenge Series

The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.