Katyazag

You're Awesome - Keep fighting the good fight ;-) (re The Tenderloins, and their individual Articles)

That is all. :) :) --Peter a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk) 09:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

\

Changes to the Shibutani sibling articles

Hi Lilydog945, can you explain why you changed the Shibutanis article? I merged these 2 articles together because I don't believe they each warrant a separate article. The main focus of their accomplishments is on the skaters as a team.

I noticed that you mentioned that the page "broke Google searches". Can you explain this? Natg 19 (talk) 03:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Number one, the merges are COMPLETELY unnecessary, and many members of the figure skating community agree. Tessa Virtue and Scott Moir have individual pages, and they have skated together for their entire lives. Same with many other ice dance teams. Just because Maia and Alex are siblings doesn't mean they should have just one page. They are now beginning to go on separate paths with there being talk about Alex seeking out a new career in ice dance or theatre.

You merging the pages COMPLETELY ruined their search results. The infobox that comes up when you google "Maia Shibutani" was ruined, and Alex's still has yet to be completely fixed. The fact that you actually used Alex's original page for the "merged" page made it even worse. The most glaring dilemma behind this was that other wikipedia languages still had Alex's page! Even the Russians don't think it's necessary to merge the two skaters!

All in all, the merge was completely unnecessary. Members of sports teams have individual pages – this is no different.

Alex Shibutani has an RFC

Alex Shibutani has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

Just notifying you about an RfC that I opened that relates to the discussion we had about the Shibutani ice dance partners. Natg 19 (talk) 00:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

PROD of Davis and White

Please read WP:PROD. It is very explicit. Removal of the PROD tag stops the proposed deletion process. Once the PROD tag is removed by anyone (even the original author) for any or no stated reason, it can not be restored. Your edit warring to restore the PROD tag will not get the article deleted. Once the PROD tag has been removed the next step is to take the article to WP:AFD. If you continue to edit war over an invalid Proposed Deletion template you could be blocked. ~ GB fan 13:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)