Jaxson1

Jaxson1, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Jaxson1!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Music For Dog People

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Music For Dog People, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Cracker (album). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Music For Dog People

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Music For Dog People. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Cracker (album). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Cracker (album) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Everymorning talk 17:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Music For Dog People

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Music For Dog People requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Music For Dog People

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Music For Dog People requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Soul Dogfood

I've moved your Soul Dogfood article to Draft:Soul Dogfood, since all of the other articles about this band and its albums are still in draft. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1991 Music For Dog People.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1991 Music For Dog People.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Blue Dogs concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blue Dogs, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Blue Dogs

Hello, Jaxson1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Blue Dogs".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar ^{t} 13:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Blue Dogs concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blue Dogs, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Music For Dog People concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Music For Dog People, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Music For Dog People

Hello, Jaxson1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Music For Dog People".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Blue Dogs (band) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blue Dogs (band), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Davis (musician) (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Checked Billboard citation ref 4, Dixie Lullaby - Pat Green and Billboard citation ref 8, Where I'm From - Jason Michael Carroll and both link correctly to Billboard information referenced. Please advise?

Removed citation ref 24, The Gamecock Album - Patrick Davis. Could not verify Billboard placement info

Removed Facebook source reference for RJDMF Foundation

Jaxson1 (talk) 13:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patrick Davis (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Patrick Davis (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 09:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Jaxson1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SeraphWiki (talk) 09:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blue Dogs (band) (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Thank you SeraphWiki I will come back to this Wiki entry once I have Patrick Davis completed Jaxson1 (talk) 19:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blue Dogs (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blue Dogs (band), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 08:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Davis (musician) has been accepted

Patrick Davis (musician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Zawl 18:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you to the good folks at Wikipedia for your guidance and encouragement and most of all for your time and expertise Jaxson1 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Blue Dogs has been accepted

The Blue Dogs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KingAndGod 09:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you KingAndGod and all the good people that work behind the scenes for Wikipedia. Your work, guidance, and tireless efforts are very much appreciated to novice Wiki builders such as myself. (Jaxson1 (talk) 10:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC))

KingAndGod can I have the word (band) placed behind The Blue Dogs title at the top of the page please? It would then read The Blue Dogs (band) (Jaxson1 (talk) 10:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC))

Sure. I guess it helps distinguish the two topics better. KingAndGod 10:35, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you (Jaxson1 (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC))

KingAndGod when I copy the URL link and attempt to use the pasted link it seems to drop the last ")" which confuses the browser search engine. Can you think of a reason it would do this? (Jaxson1 (talk) 11:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC))

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jaxson1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Patrick Davis.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Patrick Davis.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello Jaxson1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jaxson1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jaxson1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ' – Frood (talk) 01:03, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

I am not being compensated in any way, shape, or form. Thank you.

Your addition to David Earle Johnson has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello Diannaa, can you tell me what the copyrighted material sited above I added please?

Thanks Jaxson1 (talk) 18:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello Diannaa, I have addresses the copyright issue with the photo. The permissions have been added to the file page, is there anything else I need to do concerning this?

Thank you Jaxson1 (talk) 02:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in replying - I did not know you had sent me a message. Some of the content was copied from AllMusic, so I have removed it again. Some has no sources, and has been awaiting citations since 2009, so I removed it. Please don't re-add without citations.— Diannaa (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello Diannaa, I will work on this some more and repost once I have it recomposed. Thanks. Jaxson1 (talk) 12:44, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to James Brown, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

• If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
• If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Sundayclose (talk) 15:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

The linked site is an historical archive site for South Carolina, it makes no money and offers no services other than historical reference. James Brown was born in South Carolina so the link was to his page. I do not own any copyrights to his likeness or music but I did create the content posted on his page, (verbiage, videos, audio files, picture content. Will these conditions qualify a link under external links?

Thanks Jaxson1 (talk) 20:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

The problem is with this website that you linked in the James Brown article. That website copied the information word for word from from another website that has a copyright notice. So the website you linked violates copyright. That makes it inappropriate as an external link on Wikipedia. See WP:COPYVIOEL. Sundayclose (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

There were two authors for the Biography, I contacted them and got their permission to use what they had written for the historical website. I will not pursue placing a Link on this Wikipedia page.Thanks Jaxson1 (talk) 21:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

I don't think you understand the problem here. First, Wikipedia cannot link the historical website because it violates copyright. Again please read WP:COPYVIOEL. I don't see the value of your communicating with a website that can't be linked because of Wikipedia policy. Secondly, your private communications are entirely irrelevant for Wikipedia's purposes. Wikipedia needs verifiable permission directly from any person, publisher, website, etc. if it wants to place copyrighted information in an article. But that's really beside the point regarding an external link to a website that violates copyright. If you don't plan to link the website in any Wikipedia article, then this particular issue is settled. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Blue Dogs01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Blue Dogs01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate:

Good evening NinjaRobotPirate,

I have read over your Wikipedia:Spam page and your Wikipedia: Guide to appealing blocks page, both in relation to the reason I was given for being blocked which was “You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.”

Could you please clarify on this so that I may better understand what advertising or promotion is being referenced? The website I link to the artists Wikipedia page is strictly an historical archive website that I maintain and run for the state of South Carolina. There is no money involved, no advertising, no promotions, it is strictly factual history.

I feel it is also important to note that using this same account I have built three Wikipedia pages for three South Carolina artists who did not have Wikipedia representation which offers the additional proof that I am contributing in a most positive way.

I do apologize if I am not understanding the issue clearly, I would never add anything to one of our states artist wiki pages of malicious content nor would I intentionally do anything to de-value or de-face their online representation. Thank you for your time, your work, and any help you can offer me.

Jaxson1 (talk) 19:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Mass-adding external links is often called link spamming on Wikipedia. It's always a bit suspicious when someone seems focused almost entirely on adding external links. You say the website is noncommercial, which is something I didn't realize when I blocked you. However, if everyone added their personal blog or fansite, Wikipedia articles would quickly end up with dozens of external links. One of the other problems is that people sometimes use Wikipedia to get their name into the world as an established expert on a topic or attempt to use Wikipedia gain a foothold for their fringe theory.

Thus, Wikipedia tends to take a broad view of promotion, potentially beyond where many other websites would draw the line. In this way, pretty much anything can be promoted: an idea, a noncommercial website, a political ideology, or, yes, a commercial product. If your resource is truly that useful, someone else will add it. See also Wikipedia's guideline on linking to blogs, which discourages these links unless they're written by a recognized authority. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

I guess we can agree to disagree, it's certainly not worth fighting for. Thanks again for your time and I wish you the best.

Jaxson1 (talk) 23:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Well, it doesn't have to be the end of the line. If you'd at least agree to use {{Edit COI}} to request that a link to your own website be added, you could be unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request that I be unblocked please, one of the three pages I built requires updating. Going forward I agree to use {{Edit COI}} as NinjaRobotPirate recommended. Thank you. Jaxson1 (talk) 15:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, what do I need to do to be unblocked? I agree to use the template listed in your previous message to request a link to my website as you suggest. Thanks. Jaxson1 (talk) 21:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaxson1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I added a link to an historical website for the history of music from the state of South Carolina. This link was not for advertisement or advertising, it was for educational purposes only relating to the history of a South Carolina music artist now deceased

Decline reason:

You seem to think the problem is a single link you added. That's not the case. Please reread your block notice. Yamla (talk) 11:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2024 unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaxson1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that placing links to the historical website was not the proper way to do this. Going forward I will utilize @NinjaRobotPirate: suggestion to use {{Edit COI}} to request that a link to my website be added to a Wikipedia page Jaxson1 (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per Yamla below. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, you imply the problem is the single link you added. I already told you this is not the case. I strongly suggest you remove your open unblock request, reread the block notice and all the linked policies and guidelines, and only then make a new unblock request that addresses the concerns. Be warned, you don't have an infinite number of unblock requests and have currently wasted two. --Yamla (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)