Dean12065

Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jayron32 12:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Since your prior, shorter block has not encouraged you to abide by Wikipedia's policies, perhaps a longer block will. Take these 6 months to read, review, and learn the same Wikipedia policies you have been warned about in the past. Given the numerous prior notifications of these problems, I won't link to them again. If you think you are ready to abide by Wikipedia's policies, and can express clear understanding of the things you have been warned to stop doing, please follow the instructions above to request an unblock. --Jayron32 12:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dean12065 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I get it. I know what I did was wrong. I won't do things like genre warring or feud with other editors ever again. But blocking me for 6 months is just overkill. If you could unblock me, can I at least just edit articles to make them look neater (ex: fixing typos, adding needed links, cleaning up navigation boxes)?

Decline reason:

Had you agreed to a topic ban on music and/or musicians, I'd have been tempted to unblock you to give you an opportunity to demonstrate how much you've changed. As you are unwilling to abide by such a topic ban and given the history of abuse from this account, I decline the unblock. Yamla (talk) 13:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not sure if Jayron32 would add to this, but I would want at least agreement to a topic ban from editing articles related to music and/or musicians. In addition, it is easy to say that you will not feud with other editors, but what will you do if you find yourself in an editing dispute? 331dot (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Please don't forever block me on editing music-related articles. They are the only articles that I am interested in editing on Wikipedia. Dean12065 (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

It wouldn't be forever(you could appeal it after a time, say 6 months) but you have demonstrated through your edits that you can't edit those types of articles within Wikipedia guidelines of content and behavior. Editing other articles in the correct manner would show that you are capable of editing correctly and could potentially be trusted with editing music articles again. You also have not answered my question above. You have the choices of 1) agreeing to this, 2)not agreeing to this and see if you get a better offer from someone else or 3) waiting out your six month block. Choose as you will. 331dot (talk) 17:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

I will go with 2. I want to wait for another person who is more open to unblock me and see if I can have a third chance to edit music-related articles again. As for getting into an editing dispute, I would just ask for help from another editor, but I was told there is a better way to do this than just asking for help on someone's talk page. Dean12065 (talk) 18:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Very well, I will leave this open for someone else to review. In terms of editing disputes, please read about dispute resolution(which should be done if normal WP:BRD discussion fails). 331dot (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Smiths

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Smiths you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Spintendo -- Spintendo (talk) 04:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Smiths

The article The Smiths you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Smiths for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Spintendo -- Spintendo (talk) 05:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 20:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dean12065 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I get it, okay. I won't do sock puppetry ever again (even though I just learned what it means and had no idea that my other account was considered a sock puppet). Dean12065 (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You can take advantage of the standard offer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:29, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sock meaning

"...even though I just learned what it means and had no idea that my other account was considered a sock puppet". I doubt this claim as he seemed to know what it meant here. Robvanvee 08:43, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

I had no idea what I meant there. I just said that because the article looked much better compared to what it used to look like. Also, why did you revert my edits to the "Arctic Monkeys songs" template and the Rolling Stones? Those edits clearly made them much better and look like other good quality articles and templates. Dean12065 (talk) 14:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

• Because of your previous edit/"demand", I've revoked Talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:My Life Story live 2009.jpg

The file File:My Life Story live 2009.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, uploaded for >6mo

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:24, 25 December 2019 (UTC)