Quit vandalizing the articles. If you can't do the appropriate image corrections such as uploading a marginally higher quality version of an image-- it is still inferior quality and until the Sugimori art comes up on www.pokemon.co.jp as it often has in the past, the image quality and outlines will be compromised. However, if it will stop your vandalism, I will bother myself to upload the pokebeach version of Mukubird for now.

In regards to Rampard's image, it was allegedly presented on the www.pokemon.co.jp site, as such it is automatically official, whether drawn in the 'official' style or not. If you have issue with the image, remove the fair use credit on the image itself http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Image:Ramuparudo.jpg , and explain why. However, continuing to remove the image at a time when there is no sufficient replacement is unideal, especially in a detrimental manner. --ArrEmmDee 00:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

3RR in re Trideps

edit

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.-Jeske (Mail goes here) 00:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't care i will keep on removing the non official artwork

I also don't know do the talk thing.

To use a talk page, click on the "Discussion" tab at the top of the page, hit "Edit this page", and type out your piece. Simple as that. -Jeske (Mail goes here) 00:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


I get what the big deal is i'm only removing nonofficial artwork

Mukubird

edit

Go to the side of the page, look for the toolbox and click upload file, or go to imageshack.us and upload it and post the link here. Nemu 01:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Until you learn to correctly upload images, do not remove existing ones without good reason. Simply because it is not artwork done by a specific source is not good enough. So long as it is done by a reputable source, it is fine. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'll add that if you remove one more image on any of those three pages, I'll report you for 3RR. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Too late, Someguy. -Jeske (Mail goes here) 01:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC), speaking on behalf of ArrEmmDee.Reply

MukuBird

edit

This are the links i got on Image shack don't know what do next

<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/521/397tj8.png" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>

http://img147.imageshack.us/my.php?image=397tj8.png

http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/521/397tj8.png

the other two are for forums

Reported for 3rr on Mukubird

edit

And if you don't stop, you'll be reported for Trideps and Rampard as well. Whether you agree or not, Wikipedia presumably has the rules in place for a reason and disagreement is not an excuse for ignorance of them. --ArrEmmDee 01:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm adding it now. This behavior is unacceptable. Your picture isn't even any different. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


your kidding right you can't tell the difference.

Don't Care

edit

Fine report me i don't care i just feel that there not be unofficial artwork of pokemon on any of the pokemon's pages and the Mukubird and Rampard artwork are not official

DSDark, you have been told several times (by ArrEmmDee, TTN, and Someguy) that the Mukubird artwork is official (it is low-resolution).
You have been reported to the Administrators' 3RR Noticeboard for your reverts to Mukubird and Rampard. -Jeske (Mail goes here) 01:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
You will be blocked soon enough and your edits undone. Remember this when your block expires. Constantly reverting will only get you blocked. It will not accomplish anything than to annoy other editors. Your reverts will not remain, and your opinions will go unheeded. You can try discussing things to get things changed. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

User notice: temporary 3RR block

edit

Regarding reversions[1] made on December 14 2006 to Mukubird

edit
 
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 08:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re your mail... you were only... breaking 3RR. Please don't. Why is this edit so vital? See-also WP:1RR 20:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Substing

edit

Warning messages on this page have been subst'd using the AutoWikiBrowser . Note:This is not a new warning, but only some minor maintenance, following Wikipedias policy of subst'ing warning templates. Thank you.- Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:56, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blanking

edit

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Image:Ramuparudo.jpg. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You already got a block for this crap, I'd suggest not persisting. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply