CorrectionAcct

November 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Two-spirit, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Engage on talk. Some of this looks like it could be WP:LINKSPAM. Discuss it. WP is a collaborative process. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Two-spirit shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your removal of an edit-warring warning and editing of my talk page comments[1] could be perceived as a bad faith effort to avoid transparency. I strongly encourage you to avoid this behaviour if your editing privileges are returned at some point. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 22:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Two-spirit. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – bradv^🍁 00:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC)