Biochen123

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liran Carmel has been accepted

Liran Carmel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 22:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eran Meshorer has been accepted

Eran Meshorer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noahfgodard (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Guy Bloch

Thank you for your work here. Unfortunately, for a WP:BLP (biography of living person), this is unsourced, which is unacceptable. Could you add some reliable sources, see WP:RS, supporting some of the claims made? Additionally, the formatting of this is a bit strange, e.g., the [4][5] parts. Were you trying to add references?If so, please have a look at Help:Referencing. Alternatively, is this a format similar to the one used for another website (i.e., did you closely paraphrase some of the content from other websites, or is it your original work? If the latter is true, no worries and thanks, but do address the other issues if it is possible)? If so, please comment on that, your efforts are appreciated, but that is not the proper way to add references to Wikipedia. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

thank you for your notes, I will edit the references as acceptable Biochen123 (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:14, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Guy Bloch has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Guy Bloch. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:38, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear editor,

Following your comments, I have revised this page. I added various references to external sources.

Can you please examine this page again and advise me if it's good enough or how to proceed.

Thank you Biochen123 (talk) 12:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Biochen123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Dear editor,

I was asked to fill a statment about conflict of interests for Biochen123 user, and I need your help.

I have a Phd in biology and I have been working for over 35 years in the Alexander Silberman Institude of Life Sciences in various research projects.

During the past few months I have composed voluntarily five pages for the following Scientists: Liran Carmel, Eran Meshorer, Nissim Benvenisty, Sagiv Shifman and Guy Bloch. All these scientists are nteworthy  full proffessors, whose work I am well acquainted with. Currently there are 73 active scientists in the institute, and I chose only a few. I did not receive any money for writing these pages, and did it only because these are leading scientists in their respective fields, as can be seen by the description of their research and by their lists of publications.

Unfortunately, despite the very concise information that can be easily checked by the references I included (all on-line easily accessible sources), all these pages have been marked as written for money and as suspicious information.

I have another page under construction about the Alexander Silberman Institude of Life Sciences. I have inserted varius improvements but have not yet resubmitted it. I would like to sort this problem first. All the abobve mentioned pages should be linked to this page about the institute.

Please advise me regrding the following subjects:

1. Where do I fill the statement about conflict of interests?

2. what should I write there?

3. What should I do (whom should I approach) in order to remove the warning remarks from each of these pages?

Sincerely Biochen123 (talk) 14:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Biochen123: I'm going to remove the undisclosed-payments notices from these articles, as you've been open about your potential conflict of interest and there doesn't now seem to be any basis to suspect you were paid to write them. However, the types of sources for the biography sections are still not ideal. Wikipedia prefers non-primary sources for biographies, meaning no sources written by the person the article is about. This includes university homepages and publications on which the person in question is a co-author (although such publications should be fine as citations for the person's scientific contributions). Could you find some sources outside these domains for the biography sections? This could include newspaper articles, journal articles written by other people, a TV program, etc. It's fine if the sources are in Hebrew. --Tserton (talk) 21:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your new page

I moved it to User:Biochen123, because it is a user page and not an article. Mvqr (talk) 13:14, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Welcome, Biochen123!

Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Biochen123! I'm Saurabhsaha, and I've been assigned as your mentor. Around 10% of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor randomly taken from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia!

Saurabh^{Talk} 22:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Shimshon Belkin

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shimshon Belkin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Itamar Harel moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Itamar Harel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 20:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences has been accepted

Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itamar Harel (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itamar Harel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 16:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)