User talk:Χ/Archive 2011

Archive 2005

←

Archive 2009

Archive 2010

Archive 2011

Archive 2012

Archive 2013

→

Archive 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Abjiklam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Meno25 (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Arabic alphabet

Hi Abjiklam, regarding that revert, Arabic letters pronunciation slightly differ from region to region. If we are to write all the phones for each letter and each region, it would take an unnecessary space in an article which deals with the alphabet themselves, not the Arabic phonology. That's why, I, after distinguishing the velars from the uvulars, thought that it wasn't a good idea, because they are not phonemically meaningful and are not essentially very different from each other and for the previously mentioned reason. Only the hugely different phones were distinguished (affricate/fricative vs velar). Most of the letters were pronounced differently in the stage of Classical Arabic, already. If you found that it is meaningful for the alphabet article to mention those differences, then almost each letter would have two phones mentioned (or more), in addition to their use to write spoken varieties of Arabic. Thanks. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 12:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Mahmudmasri. Of course it would be excessive to write all the different allophones for all phonemes of all dialects, but it seemed to me that the uvular fricatives were the ones most widely used across all regions, and so deserved to be mentioned, as opposed to the rather restrictive use of [gʲ] which was mentioned in the talk page. After reading the notes in Arabic phonology, I was surprised to read the velars were actually more popular as I've never heard anyone pronounce it so (may I ask you how you pronounce them? =P). So I suppose it won't hurt if we remove the uvulars, although Arabic sounds very odd to me if I pronounce it with velars. If you do remove the uvulars, please make sure you don't delete the change I've made on ظ because I fixed a link on this letter. I won't be available on Wikipedia for the next 2 weeks, but you can leave a message here if you want to and I'll answer it when I come back. Regards. — Abjiklam (talk • stalk) 17:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Uvular fricatives pronunciation exist at most parts of Arabia, Iraq, Libya, Tunisia, while the velar fricatives pronunciation exist at Egypt, Sudan, Levant (Lebanon, Syria, Jordan), Algeria, Morocco. As a result, I, as an Egyptian, pronounce them as velars. Contrary to the notion that Literary Arabic has one strict standard pronunciation from coast to coast, it has a loose standard with many pronunciations considered to be correct. I suppose you're from France, and to my knowledge, you have a rhotic consonant which is usually a voiced uvular approximant. I suppose that it might confused you with the velar fricatives. Maybe the ones you know who speak Arabic are from parts where I mentioned. About the palatalized [gʲ], it also exists at parts of Sudan, parts of Yemen and parts of Oman. In Egypt, as well as parts of Yemen and parts of Oman, we pronounce ج as a plain voiced velar plosive [ɡ]. Do you know that the voiced velar plosive is considered the prestigious pronunciation for ج in Egypt? About the [ðˤ] ~ [zˤ], I wasn't the one to make it. Kwamikagami was the one to do that. Have a good time. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 23:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Congress for the Republic Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Congress for the Republic Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

I was the one who orphaned it. The author of the image uploaded a new image on commons and so there is no need for the image I uploaded anymore. Therefore I have no objection to it being deleted after seven days. Thank you. — Abjiklam (talk • stalk) 17:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tunisian general election, 2004 with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 17:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

My answer — Abjiklam (talk • stalk) 17:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

One Thousand and One Nights

Hi. About the revert, I thought it would be interesting to know the literal translation since the wording is quite unusual for readers who don't know Arabic. — Abjiklam (talk • stalk) 22:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I got the point, and as I said - no one would question the good faith of your edit - just that as the difference is simply word order, which everyone knows differs between different languages anyway - it is not really that notable. In the usual sense of the word the translation is already perfectly "literal". It would be quite different if the "word-for-word" order differed in meaning, although even then we would probably put it a bit further down (as we do, ofr instance, with the title "Arabian Nights"). Incidentally the title of Burton's translation does use the Arabic word order, and I think this is actually mentioned further down the page. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 08:11, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Arabic languages and the official Literary Arabic

I have replied on the talk page of Arabic language. Please, consider seeing it. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Arabic alphabet world distribution.PNG

Hi Abjiklam. Thanks for updating the map, but North Sudan has English as an another official language, which makes it uses Latin script, so, it has to be colored as light green, as well. The same thing also applies to Pakistan, it has English as another official language. Western Sahara use Spanish and French, too. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 18:05, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Mahmud. Thanks for catching that mistake, I'll change it asap. However, the constitution of Western Sahara only mentions Arabic. — abjiklam (talk · stalk) 18:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I changed it already. Anyway, at Western Sahara people use Spanish and French more than they use Arabic. Their liberation movement has its official website only in Spanish. The same case is similar to Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia, where Arabic is the only official language, but the vast majority of the population use French more often that they use Arabic in reading and writing, even officially, occasionally French is used, but not stated in the constitutions of these countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahmudmasri (talk • contribs) 18:59, 21 September 2011

Regarding your last edit, well China and Malaysia officially don't use Arabic script, which would lead them to be colored in gray. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 02:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Uyghur is an official language of the Xinjiang region of China and is written with the Arabic script. In Malaysia, the Jawi script still has an official status. — abjiklam (talk · stalk) 19:08, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

At Malaysia and Brunei aticles, it is stated that Malay alphabet is the official script, why? --Mahmudmasri (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Well, frankly, I don't know why! ;) I've done some reasearch though. For Malaysia, the National Language Act does mention the Jawi script. The Jawi script is still pretty common on street signs, and Malaysian ringgits are written in both Latin and Jawi scripts. For Brunei, this article from the Brunei Times says Jawi is official. — abjiklam (talk · stalk) 18:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 2011

A tag has been placed on Template:Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 2011, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

AGF creation but now as a result of T3 it duplicated content already listed (with more detail)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lihaas (talk) 06:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

RE: Renaming of Results of the Tunisian Constituent Assembly election, 2011

hmm, i dont usually edit anglo election articles because of the crowd there that goes mad, but i edit most other election articles and we generally call it election without an s for plural. but youre rational and non-confrontational so i do wish to leave it to you. Either move it back or get a 3rd opinion, your call.Lihaas (talk) 21:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah people can get mad sometimes :P Anyway, the problem is not the word election which I agree to keep singular, it's the word result. I'll go ahead now and revert your renaming simply to keep it consistent with the other articles. — ABJIKLAM (t · c) 23:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Your WT:AWB application

Hello Abjiklam. If you will be using AWB, I recommend that you enable Wikipedia email in your Special:Preferences. See the section on that page called 'Email options.' Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks. — ABJIKLAM (t · c) 19:29, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Ghannouchi

why did you regect my changes on Ghannouchi? I'm sure he was not a president of Tunisia since the constitution did not allow him to be a president.--197.28.183.184 (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Constitutions don't allow many things. That doesn't stop them from happening. Unless I'm mistaken, the constitution didn't allow Ben Ali to be cried out of office or Gaddafi to be shot out of his. Particularly, Egypt's constitution left no provision whatsoever for the military to become the new government but there sits a soldier as the Egyptian head of state. Therequiembellishere (talk) 17:32, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

But even Ghannouchi himself did not pretend that he is a president and all what he did was conforming to the constitution, in fact he proclamed that he will take the charges of the absent president till he returns to Tunisia. In this case of the constitution, Ben Ali remains the effective president and Ghannouchi has not the right of the constitutional oath and so he is not a president. In fact when the constitutional council proclamed that Ben Ali is never a president, Moubazaa became a president because that is what the constitution say. I want to ask you where are you from because I'm tunisin and lived the days of the revolution in Tunisia and I'm sure of what I'm saying.--197.28.183.184 (talk) 18:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Actually, when I reverted your edit, it was simply because your edit had erased the structural changes I had added (hlist instead of nowrap). As for whether Ghannouchi should stay on the list, I don't have a definite opinion so I'll let you guys discuss about it on the talk page. — ABJIKLAM (t · c) 20:24, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

hlist

• importScript('User:WOSlinker/hlist.js');
• →User:Abjiklam/common.js

Hi. The above is helpful. Note that you will often have to fuss with things further, as there are a lot of oddly marked-up templates. Alarbus (talk) 08:05, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks that is quite helpful! — ABJIKLAM (t · c) 08:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Enjoy. See Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-11-21/Technology report, too. Another other useful one is class="plainlist" (and if needed {{plainlist}}). It's mostly for infoboxes and such.

I see you've been styling groups with line-height: 1.4em;. Mostly I believe such things should be skipped to keep template markup clean. If there's a good case that the default (1.5) is too much, then the site css should be tweaked for all navboxes (float idea at MediaWiki talk:Common.css if you like). Alarbus (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for your help. — ABJIKLAM (t · c) 23:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Arabic alphabet world distribution.PNG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Arabic alphabet world distribution.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

 Done — ABJIKLAM (t · c) 21:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)