Wikipedia

KC-X

(Redirected from United States Air Force KC-135 replacement effort)

KC-X was the United States Air Force (USAF) program to procure its next-generation aerial refueling tanker aircraft to replace some of their older Boeing KC-135 Stratotankers. The contest was for a production contract for 179 new tankers with estimated value of US$35 billion. The two contenders to replace the KC-135 aircraft were Boeing and EADS, following the elimination of US Aerospace, Inc. from the bidding process.[1]

KC-X program
The Boeing KC-46 Pegasus, the winner of the KC-X program
General information
Project forAerial refueling tanker aircraft
Issued byUnited States Air Force
ProposalsAirbus A330 MRTT
Boeing KC-767
Antonov An-112KC
PrototypesBoeing KC-767
Airbus A330 MRTT
History
Concluded2011
OutcomeRound 1: EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45 selected for production, but result protested
Round 2: Boeing KC-46 Pegasus selected for production, no protest
PredecessorsCommercial Derivative Air Refueling Aircraft

The KC-X program followed earlier attempts by the USAF to procure a new tanker. A 2002 plan had the USAF leasing Boeing KC-767 tankers, followed by a 2003 modification where the USAF would buy most of the KC-767 aircraft and lease several more of them. Corruption investigations revealed wrongdoing in the award of the contract and the contract was canceled in 2005, setting the stage for the KC-X program.

The USAF issued the KC-X request for proposal in January 2007,[2] then selected the Northrop Grumman/EADS team and their Airbus A330 MRTT-based tankers in February 2008.[3] In June 2008, the U.S. Government Accountability Office sustained a protest by Boeing on the award of the contract.[4][5] In July 2008, the U.S. Defense Department reopened the bidding process,[6] but canceled the KC-X solicitation in September 2008.[7] In September 2009, the USAF began the first steps toward accepting new bids.[8] In March 2010, Northrop Grumman announced that it would pull out of the bidding process.[9] Despite Northrop Grumman's withdrawal, EADS decided to remain in the ongoing competition alone.[10] The Air Force selected Boeing's KC-46 bid on 24 February 2011.[11]

Background

edit

The initial plan was to lease Boeing KC-767 tankers on a sole-source basis; Boeing is the only American company with the requisite industrial capability to manufacture large-body aircraft. As such, the KC-767 was selected in 2002[12] in 2003 Boeing was awarded a US$20 billion contract to lease KC-767 tankers to replace the KC-135.

Led by Senator John McCain, several US government leaders protested the lease contract as wasteful and problematic. In response to the protests, the Air Force struck a compromise in November 2003, whereby it would purchase 80 KC-767 aircraft and lease 20 more.[13]

However, in December 2003, the Pentagon announced the project was to be frozen while an investigation of allegations of corruption by one of its former procurement staffers, Darleen Druyun (who had moved to Boeing in January 2003) was begun. Druyun pleaded guilty of criminal wrongdoing and was sentenced to nine months in prison for "negotiating a job with Boeing at the same time she was involved in contracts with the company".[14] Additional fallout included the termination of CFO Michael M. Sears, who received a four-month prison sentence,[15] the resignation of Boeing CEO Philip M. Condit,[16][17] and Boeing paying $615 million in fines.[18] In January 2006, the lease contract was formally canceled.[19]

Proposals

edit

Initial competition

edit

The USAF then began the KC-X tanker replacement program. The DoD posted a request for proposal on 30 January 2007.[2] The U.S. Air Force's main requirements are "fuel offload and range at least as great as the KC-135", airlift capability, ability to take on fuel in flight, and multi-point refueling capability.[2]

Two manufacturers expressed interest in producing this aircraft. The team of Northrop Grumman and EADS/Airbus proposed a version of the Airbus A330 Multi Role Tanker Transport (MRTT), based on the Airbus A330-200.[20] Boeing proposed a version of the KC-767, based on the Boeing 767.[21] The Seattle Times commented on the pre-final designs in February 2007: "Northrop has been viewed as the underdog, with a heavier, less fuel efficient aircraft. The Airbus tanker would have a maximum fuel capacity of 200,000 pounds. Northrop spokesman Randy Belote said Northrop's K-30 would tack on roughly 20 percent in fuel capacity."[22]

Both competitors submitted their tanker proposals before 12 April 2007 deadline.[23][24] In September 2007, the USAF dismissed having a mixed fleet of new tankers from both Boeing and Northrop Grumman as being unfeasible because of increased costs from buying limited numbers of two types annually.[25] In December 2007, it was announced that the KC-X tanker would be designated KC-45A regardless of which design wins the competition.[26] The DoD anticipated that the KC-45A would start to enter service in 2013.[27]

On 3 January 2008, the competitors submitted final revisions of their proposals to the U.S. Air Force.[28] On 29 February 2008, the DoD announced the selection of the Northrop Grumman/EADS's KC-30.[29]

On 11 March 2008, Boeing filed a protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) of the award of the contract to the Northrop Grumman/EADS team. Boeing stated that there are certain aspects of the USAF evaluation process that have given it grounds to appeal.[30][31] The protest was upheld by the GAO on 18 June 2008, which recommended that the Air Force rebid the contract.[4][5]

Expedited recompetition

edit

On 9 July 2008, the Defense Secretary Robert Gates put the tanker contract in an "expedited recompetition" with Defense Undersecretary John Young in charge of the selection process instead of the Air Force.[6] A draft of the revised RFP was provided to the contractors on 6 August 2008 for comments with the revised RFP to be finalized by mid-August. Proposals would be due in October 2008 and selection was to be done by the end of 2008.[32][33][34] In mid-August, there was speculation that Boeing was considering a "no bid" position.[35] On 21 August 2008 Boeing asked the DoD for an additional four months to submit a proposal centered on a larger aircraft,[36] but they opposed further delay.[37] Then on 10 September 2008, Defense Secretary Robert Gates decided that the new competition could not be fairly completed before the end of 2008. The DoD canceled the request for proposals and delayed the decision on when to issue another request until the new presidential administration was in office.[7][38][39][40]

Restarted competition

edit
 
Deputy Secretary of Defense William Lynn, speaks about KC-X at a press conference at the Pentagon on 24 September 2009.

On 16 September 2009, Secretary Gates announced a renewed effort for the KC-X program. The selection process will be under the Air Force with a "robust oversight role" by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to prevent a repeated failure.[41][42] On 25 September 2009 the USAF issued a draft request for proposals (RFP) seeking comments for the official tanker replacement RFP.[43] The RFP for a fixed-price contract specified 373 requirements for the new plane, and stated that the price of each tanker would be adjusted to reflect how much it would cost to operate over 40 years and how well it would meet various war-fighting needs. The initial contract would be for 179 aircraft for $35 billion.[44][45][46] Northrop Grumman/EADS team claimed the requirement was advantaging Boeing and threatened to withdraw from the competition on 1 December 2009.[47][48][49]

The fiscal 2011 Defense Department budget relegated $864 million in research and development money. A contract award was expected in summer 2010.[50] On 24 February 2010, the US Air Force released the revised request for proposal (RFP) for KC-X. The RFP called for the KC-X tanker to first fly in 2012 and aircraft deliveries to begin in 2013.[51]

On 8 March 2010, Northrop Grumman followed through with their earlier threat and decided to not submit a bid for the KC-X tanker stating that they believed the new evaluation methodology favored Boeing's smaller tanker.[9][52] EADS, however announced on 20 April 2010, that it was re-entering the competition on a stand-alone basis and intended to bid the KC-30 with final assembly to take place in Mobile, Alabama as planned under its prior teaming arrangement with Northrop Grumman.[53] On 18 June 2010, the USAF announced that the decision would be delayed until November 2010.[54]

On 1 July 2010, a surprise third bidder, consisting of the team of US Aerospace and the Ukrainian manufacturer Antonov announced its intention to bid in the competition. The two firms announced that they would be interested in supplying up to three types of aircraft to the United States Air Force. The types reportedly being offered were the four-engined An-124 and a twin-engined variant of the aircraft, the An-122. The third aircraft to be offered was known as the An-112.[55][56] The An-112 tanker is a version of the Antonov An-70, except with two jet engines. This tanker was proposed in the team's bid.[57]

By 9 July 2010 bids from Boeing, EADS and US Aerospace/Antonov were submitted to the Air Force.[58] However, the Air Force rejected the US Aerospace bid for allegedly arriving five minutes after the deadline, which US Aerospace disputed. US Aerospace filed separate protests with the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on 2 August and 1 September.[57][59] The U.S. Air Force proceeded with source selection while GAO investigated.[60] The GAO dismissed U.S. Aerospace's protest on 6 October.[61]

In November 2010, the USAF mistakenly sent technical reviews of the other side's bids to each of the two remaining teams.[62] At this time contract selection was postponed from late December 2010 until early 2011.[63]

Boeing and EADS submitted their final bids on 10 February 2011.[64] On 24 February 2011, Boeing's KC-767 proposal was selected as the winning offer. The tanker will be designated the KC-46A.[65] EADS North America chairman Ralph Crosby declined to protest the award saying that Boeing's bid was "very, very, very aggressive" and carried a high risk of losing money for the company.[66] Loren B. Thompson of the Lexington Institute agreed that Boeing's bid was very aggressive due to the Air Force's fixed-price contract strategy.[67]

Projected follow-on programs

edit
  • KC-Y Bridge Tanker Competition to replace KC-10.[68] Contenders: KC-46 and Airbus A330 MRTT/Lockheed Martin LMXT. In October 2023, Lockheed Martin withdrew, leaving Airbus to make the bid alone.[69]
  • KC-Z (Next Generation Air-Refueling System (NGAS)) to replace KC-135Rs[70] with possible stealth characteristics[71][72][73]

Specifications

edit

There were three different bids proposed in July 2010. EADS proposed the Airbus A330 MRTT/KC-30, Boeing proposed the KC-767, while the Antonov/US Aerospace team's bid was the An-112KC.

Specifications of KC-135 and tendered replacements[74][75][76][77][78][79][80]
KC-135R A330 MRTT / KC-30 KC-767 Advanced Tanker
(based on 767-200LRF) 		An-112KC
Length 136 ft 3 in (41.5 m) 192 ft 11 in (58.8 m) 159 ft 2 in (48.5 m) 131 ft 5 in (40.1 m)
Height 41 ft 8 in (12.7 m) 57 ft 1 in (17.4 m) 52 ft (15.8 m) 53 ft 2 in (16.2 m)
Wingspan 130 ft 10 in (39.9 m) 197 ft 10 in (60.3 m) 156 ft 1 in (47.6 m) 166 ft 2 in (50.6 m)
Fuselage width 12 ft (3.66 m) 18 ft 6 in (5.64 m) 16 ft 6 in (5.03 m) 17 ft 1 in (5.21 m)
Fuselage height 14 ft (4.27 m) 18 ft 6 in (5.64 m) 17 ft 9 in (5.41 m) –
Engines 4 x CFM International CFM56 2 x Pratt & Whitney PW4170, RR Trent 700 or
GE CF6-80 turbofans 		2 x Pratt & Whitney PW4062 2 x Engine Alliance GP7277 or
Rolls-Royce Trent 972B- 84
Thrust 4 x 21,634 lbf (96.2 kN) 2 x 72,000 lbf (320 kN) 2 x 63,500 lbf (282 kN) –
Passengers 80[81] 226–280[82] 190 300
Cargo 6 x 463L pallets 32 x 463L pallets 19 x 463L pallets 8 pallets
Maximum fuel capability 200,000 lb (90,700 kg)[83] 250,000 lb (113,000 kg) greater than 202,000 lb (91,600 kg) 139,000 lb (63,000 kg)
Max. takeoff fuel load Approximately 200,000 lb (90,700 kg)[83] 245,000 lb (111,000 kg)[74] greater than 202,000 lb (91,600 kg) 139,000 lb (63,000 kg)
Range 11,015 nmi (12,680 mi; 20,400 km)[83] 6,750 nmi (7,768 mi; 12,500 km) 6,590 nmi (7,584 mi; 12,200 km) 6,800 nmi (7,825 mi; 12,590 km)
Cruise speed Mach 0.79 (530 mph or 853 km/h) Mach 0.82 (534 mph or 859 km/h) Mach 0.80 (530 mph or 853 km/h) –
Maximum speed Mach 0.90 (600 mph or 966 km/h) Mach 0.86 (570 mph or 917 km/h) Mach 0.86 (570 mph or 917 km/h) –
Max. takeoff weight 322,500 lb (146,300 kg) 507,000 lb (230,000 kg) greater than 400,000 lb (180,000 kg) 364,000 lb (165,000 kg)
Max. landing weight 322,500 lb (146,300 kg),
normally 200,000 lb (91,000 kg) 		396,800 lb (180,000 kg) 300,000 lb (140,000 kg) –
Empty weight approx. 122,000 lb (55,000 kg) 263,700 lb (119,600 kg) 181,600 lb (82,400 kg) 164,000 lb (74,000 kg)

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Censer, Marjorie (7 October 2010). "GAO clears Air Force in tanker case". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 11 November 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2010.
  2. ^ a b c "Air Force Posts KC-X Request for Proposals". U.S. Air Force. 30 January 2007. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024. Retrieved 1 July 2011.
  3. ^ Gates, Dominic (29 February 2008). "EADS/Northrop trumps Boeing in Air Force tanker competition". Seattle Times. Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 29 February 2008.
  4. ^ a b "Statement Regarding the Bid Protest Decision Resolving the Aerial Refueling Tanker Protest by the Boeing Company" (PDF). Government Accountability Office. 18 June 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 June 2008. Retrieved 18 June 2008.
  5. ^ a b Gary L. Kepplinger, General Counsel (18 June 2008). "B-311344; B-311344.3; B-311344.4; B-311344.6; B-311344.7; B-311344.8; B-311344.10; B-311344.11, The Boeing Company, June 18, 2008".
  6. ^ a b Kruzel, John J. (9 July 2008). "Pentagon officials reopen bidding on tanker contract". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  7. ^ a b "DoD Announces Termination of KC-X Tanker Solicitation". 916th Air Refueling Wing. 12 September 2008. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  8. ^ Cole, August; Sanders, Peter (25 September 2009). "Air Force Resumes Tanker Contest". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  9. ^ a b Ostrower, Jon (9 March 2010). "Northrop Grumman declines to bid on latest KC-X RFP". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  10. ^ "Avions ravitailleurs : EADS va soumettre une offre en solo". La Tribune (in French). 20 April 2010. Archived from the original on 22 April 2010.
  11. ^ Trimble, Stephen (4 March 2011). "EADS concedes KC-X contract award to Boeing". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022.
  12. ^ Cook, Dan (1 May 2002). "Boeing Given Nod on Tanker Lease". military-aerospace-technology.com. Archived from the original on 25 December 2023.
  13. ^ Tirpak, John A. (1 February 2004). "Tanker Twilight Zone". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Archived from the original on 21 April 2023.
  14. ^ Cahlink, George (1 October 2004). "Ex-Pentagon procurement executive gets jail time". Govexec.com. Archived from the original on 8 November 2022. Retrieved 21 December 2006.
  15. ^ Palmer, Kimberly (3 October 2005). "Former Air Force acquisition official released from jail". Government Executive. Archived from the original on 27 August 2018.
  16. ^ Holmes, Stanley (15 December 2003). "Boeing: What Really Happened". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 25 June 2020.
  17. ^ Leung, Rebecca (4 January 2005). "Cashing In For Profit?". CBS News. Archived from the original on 6 February 2023.
  18. ^ "Boeing to Pay United States Record $615 Million to Resolve Fraud Allegations". U.S. Department of Justice. 30 June 2006. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  19. ^ Majumdar, Dave (24 February 2011). "Boeing wins KC-X tanker battle". Air Force Times. Archived from the original on 21 July 2012.
  20. ^ "Northrop Grumman KC-30 marketing web site". Northrop Grumman. Archived from the original on 12 February 2007. Retrieved 16 February 2007.
  21. ^ "Boeing Offers KC-767 Advanced Tanker to U.S. Air Force". Boeing. 12 February 2007. Archived from the original on 14 February 2007. Retrieved 8 September 2008.
  22. ^ Borak, Donna (13 February 2007). "Boeing Tweaks 767 for Tanker". The Seattle Times. Retrieved 8 September 2008.
  23. ^ "Boeing Submits KC-767 Advanced Tanker Proposal to U.S. Air Force". Boeing. 11 April 2007. Archived from the original on 21 May 2007.
  24. ^ "Northrop Grumman Submits KC-X Tanker Proposal to U.S. Air Force Early". Northrop Grumman. 10 April 2007. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
  25. ^ "Dual Sourcing Tanker Unfeasible, Wynne Says". ABC News. 20 September 2007. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  26. ^ Talbot, George (7 December 2007). "Boeing, Northrop vying for KC-10 service deal". al.com. Archived from the original on 24 December 2007.
  27. ^ "New tanker to bring increased capabilities to warfighter". U.S. Air Force. 3 March 2008. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  28. ^ "Boeing, Northrop Submit Final Tanker Proposals To USAF". Aviation Week. 4 January 2008. Archived from the original on 27 September 2011.
  29. ^ Cole, August (1 March 2008). "Boeing Loses Big Air Force Deal". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 24 December 2023.
  30. ^ "Boeing Protests U.S. Air Force Tanker Contract Award". Boeing. 11 March 2008. Archived from the original on 27 December 2023.
  31. ^ "Air Force officials respond to Boeing protest". U.S. Air Force. 12 March 2008. Archived from the original on 5 December 2021.
  32. ^ Butler, Amy (6 August 2008). "Pentagon Issues New Tanker Bid Parameters". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 7 March 2012.
  33. ^ "Pentagon Reopens Bidding for Aerial Tankers and Refines Expectations". The New York Times. Associated Press. 6 August 2008. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  34. ^ Pasztor, Andy (7 August 2008). "Boeing Says Bidding Changes Favor European Tanker Team". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  35. ^ Butler, Amy; Fulghum, David A. (11 August 2008). "Boeing Leaning Toward Not Re-bidding KC-X". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 7 March 2012.
  36. ^ Hedgpeth. "Tanker Bid Moves Toward Endgame"
  37. ^ Shalal-Esa, Andrea (3 September 2008). "US Air Force general urges quick action on tanker". Reuters. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  38. ^ "The USAF's KC-X Aerial Tanker RFP: Canceled". Defense Industry Daily. 10 September 2008. Archived from the original on 17 September 2008.
  39. ^ Hedgpeth, Dana (11 September 2008). "Pentagon Postpones Tanker Competition". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011.
  40. ^ Cole, August; Lunsford, J. Lynn (11 September 2008). "Boeing Gets Reprieve in Fuel-Tanker Contest". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  41. ^ Lyle, Amaani (16 September 2009). "SecDEF announces return of KC-X program". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  42. ^ Wolf, Jim; Shalal-Esa, Andrea (24 September 2009). "Pentagon's new tanker rules exclude trade fight". Reuters. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  43. ^ "KC-X Tanker Modernization Program". govtribe.com. 25 September 2009.
  44. ^ Drew, Christopher (24 September 2009). "$35 Billion Tanker Contract Opens". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  45. ^ Dunlop, Michelle (25 September 2009). "Boeing-Airbus tanker battle resumes today". Herald.net. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  46. ^ Shalal-Esa, Andrea (27 October 2009). "Alabama lawmakers say Pentagon tanker rules unfair". Reuters. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  47. ^ Shalal-Esa, Andrea (1 December 2009). "Northrop threatens to boycott US tanker contest". Reuters. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  48. ^ DiMascio, Jen (1 December 2009). "Northrop may withdraw tanker bid". Politico. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  49. ^ Tiron, Roxanna (1 December 2009). "Northrop Grumman threatens to quit competition for tanker". The Hill. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  50. ^ Garamone, Jim (1 February 2010). "Budget request continues defense reform agenda". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  51. ^ Reed, John (25 February 2010). "USAF Sets KC-X First Flight, IOC Dates". Defense News. Archived from the original on 29 May 2012.
  52. ^ Wall, Robert (10 March 2010). "No Solo KC-X Bid For EADS". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  53. ^ "EADS North America Intends to Submit Proposal for U.S. Air Force Tanker". Defense-Aerospace. 20 April 2010.
  54. ^ Rolph, Amy (21 June 2010). "Air Force delays tanker contract". Herald.net. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  55. ^ Bennett, John T. (2 July 2010). "In KC-X Twist, Ukrainian Aircraft Maker, U.S. Aerospace Readying Bid". Defense News. Archived from the original on 21 January 2013.
  56. ^ Trimble, Stephen (2 July 2010). "US company partners with Antonov in surprise KC-X bid". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 8 July 2010. Retrieved 2 July 2010.
  57. ^ a b Trimble, Stephen (5 August 2010). "US Aerospace appeals against KC-X exclusion, blames USAF 'conspiracy'". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 19 September 2010.
  58. ^ Trimble, Stephen (9 July 2010). "USAF receives three proposals for KC-X, but Antonov team admits concerns". FlightGlobal. Archived from the original on 21 December 2010.
  59. ^ Butler, Amy (7 September 2010). "U.S. Aerospace Files Second KC-X Protest". Aviation Week.
  60. ^ Amy Butler (12 August 2010). "KC-X Bidder Dialogue Begins Despite Protest". AVIATION WEEK. Retrieved 13 August 2010.[permanent dead link]
  61. ^ Wolf, Jim (6 October 2010). "Auditors reject U.S. Aerospace tanker bid protest". Reuters. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  62. ^ Drew, Christopher (30 November 2010). "Air Force Acts to Fix Error in Tanker Bid". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021.
  63. ^ Wolf, Jim (20 November 2010). "US Air Force delays tanker pick, mixes up documents". Reuters. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
  64. ^ Gates, Dominic (11 February 2011). "Boeing, EADS submit final bids for Air Force tanker contract". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on 1 April 2016.
  65. ^ Eshel, Tamir (24 February 2011). "Boeing Wins the U.S. Air Force KC-X Program". Defense-Update. Archived from the original on 10 June 2023.
  66. ^ Gates, Dominic (4 March 2011). "Rival knocks Boeing's 'lowball' tanker bid". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on 16 May 2022.
  67. ^ Munoz, Carlo (9 January 2012). "Hill Questions Boeing Plant Closure". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 17 June 2020.
  68. ^ "KC-Y – KC-10 Replacement". Global Security. Archived from the original on 26 September 2023. Retrieved 11 October 2019.
  69. ^ Lockheed drops US Air Force tanker bid; partner Airbus to go it alone, Stephen Losey, Defense News, 2023-10-24
  70. ^ Insinna, Valerie (29 November 2016). "KC-Y Competition Still Under Consideration as Air Force Works to Define Future Tanker Fleet". Defense News. Archived from the original on 31 October 2017.
  71. ^ Trevithick, Joseph (20 August 2018). "Lockheed Martin Is Crafting New Stealth and Drone Tanker Concepts for the USAF". The Drive. Archived from the original on 29 June 2023.
  72. ^ Hitchens, Theresa (1 February 2023). "Air Force wants its next-gen tanker flying by 2040". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 16 August 2023.
  73. ^ Trevithick, Joseph (26 January 2023). "Stealthy Tanker-Transport Aircraft Concept Unveiled By Boeing". The Drive. Archived from the original on 28 September 2023.
  74. ^ a b "KC-30 Brochure" (PDF). Northrop Grumman. 28 November 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2009.
  75. ^ "KC-30 Specifications". Northrop Grumman. 24 December 2007. Archived from the original on 24 December 2007.
  76. ^ "A330-200 Specification". Airbus. 4 March 2008. Archived from the original on 4 March 2008.
  77. ^ "KC-767 Advanced Tanker" (PDF). Boeing. 28 May 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2008.
  78. ^ Frawley, Gerard. The International Directory of Civil Aircraft, 2003–2004. Aerospace Publications Pty Ltd, 2003. ISBN 1-875671-58-7.
  79. ^ "A330 MRTT Specification". Airbus Military. 7 April 2014. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014.
  80. ^ "Стали известны подробности проекта Ан-112КС" [Details of the AN-112KS project have become known]. Wing.com.ua (in Russian). 14 July 2010. Archived from the original on 20 August 2023.
  81. ^ "C-135 Stratolifter / KC-135 Stratotanker". aerospaceweb.org. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023.
  82. ^ "KC-45 Tanker". Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems. Archived from the original on 27 December 2008.
  83. ^ a b c "Factsheets : KC-135 Stratotanker". Archived from the original on 24 October 2014. Retrieved 16 June 2016.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=KC-X&oldid=1243724831"