- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 16:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Created by Edwardx (talk). Self-nominated at 21:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
QPQ: 
- Not done
Overall: 
Seems to be me the subject is a politician who happens to hold an academic position not the other way around as implied by the hook. However, it is not technically wrong so I'm fine with it. We just need a QPQ and we are good to go. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- QPQ done. Agreed that he is probably more a politician than academic, but the hook seems to read better that way round. I'm always open to better hook ideas. Edwardx (talk) 00:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
QPQ done, so good to go with provided hook. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- I don't understand why you changed "elections" to "eating contests" in the hook. Were you trying to be funny? It has been returned to the original
wording. Edwardx (talk) 22:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ugh, I totally forgot my son had installed this Chrome extension which automatically changes "election" to "eating contest" (now disabled). --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not done
Seems to be me the subject is a politician who happens to hold an academic position not the other way around as implied by the hook. However, it is not technically wrong so I'm fine with it. We just need a QPQ and we are good to go. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
