Template:Did you know nominations/Raorchestes chalazodes

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Raorchestes chalazodes

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Raorchestes chalazodes

• ... that Raorchestes chalazodes (pictured) lay their eggs inside bamboo, and are the only species in their genus to exhibit parental care? Source: https://journals.ku.edu/reptilesandamphibians/article/view/14405
  • Reviewed:

5x expanded by Qazwsx1515 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC).

• Approve hook and image Article was 5x expanded on November 10th from ~1400 characters to ~7800 characters, meeting length requirements. The article reads neutrally and properly has in-line citations (could use some wiki-linking though) and there's no copyvio issues found from the detector. The hook is short enough, interesting, and is cited inline (at two spots for separate parts of the hook). The QPQ is unneeded as the nominator is new and the image is open copyright and looks good at a small size. Everything seems good to go! Silverseren^C 23:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
• @Qazwsx1515 and Silver seren: I can't find anywhere in the cited source that talks about laying eggs on bamboo. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

• Ah, RoySmith, that's because the hook is combining information from two separate sources and Qazwsx1515 forgot to put the other one, I believe. Here's the other source with that info. Silverseren^C 23:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, tick restored. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

The last sentence of the paragraph under the parental care section needs a citation, along with the second paragraph in that section. SL93 (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

SL93, I checked the source used in the first paragraph and it covers all of that info. Not sure why it wasn't used by Qazwsx1515 for the end of the first paragraph and the second paragraph. But I've extended it to cover those sections now. Silverseren^C 19:54, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Ok. SL93 (talk) 13:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)