Template:Did you know nominations/Military on Gotland

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Military on Gotland

(

)

... that Sweden has decided to reestablish a garrison on Gotland, restoring a permanent military presence (pictured) that prior to 2005 had remained in place in one form or another for nearly 200 years?

Comment: First nomination for the user

Created by Ceannlann gorm (talk). Nominated by Ceannlann gorm (talk) at 22:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC).

ALT 1 - ... that, after a 10-year gap, Sweden will reestablish its previously unbroken 200-year military presence on Gotland (unit crest pictured)?

- A bit shorter, and I think the crest is more striking as a small picture that the slightly blurry tank pic. w.carter-Talk 23:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Fixed the length of the primary hook as noted elsewhere by BlueMoonset (it's at around 163 characters now). Thanks! Ceannlann gorm (talk) 12:25, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Rather at 155 (not including spaces) the "?" and "(pictured)" does not count. w.carter-Talk 12:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

As DYK counts spaces and also the ending "?", the total for the revised primary hook is now actually 187 characters, below the absolute maximum of 200. (We don't count " (pictured)" or the initial ellipsis periods or the space after them.) BlueMoonset (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

More info all the time! :) Thanks for clarifying. w.carter-Talk 17:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Full review still needed. (The above discussion was not reviewing!) BlueMoonset (talk) 13:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Clearly long enough, new enough, QPQ unnecessary, assuming good faith on various offline and foreign language sources. ALT1 short enough and sourced. Good to go.--Laun chba ller 21:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I came by to promote this. @W.carter: wasn't it a 9-year gap (2005-2014)? Yoninah (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

@Yoninah: A terrible typo, now corrected. It is actually ten years, 2005 (stood down) to March 2015 (decision to reestablish). @Ceannlann gorm: Did I get it right this time?

w.carter-Talk 21:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Ack, I should have caught that one myself! Thanks guys! Ceannlann gorm (talk) 21:23, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Restoring tick based on Launchballer's review. Yoninah (talk) 21:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)