Talk:Ziad Hayek

Notability

Hello, Please find below the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject:

1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5303410.stm
2. http://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2014/04/15/restructuring-the-power-sector-in-lebanon
3. https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2019/02/20/lebanon-nominates-ziad-hayek-for-world-bank-boss

Thank youNicoleKhaw (talk) 07:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

@NicoleKhaw: Thanks, I don't see the subject mentioned in the first two. The third is good. Are there one or two more of this quality available? ~Kvng (talk) 13:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

@Kvng: Yes of course there are. Please find them below:

• https://www.devex.com/news/lebanon-withdraws-world-bank-nominee-under-pressure-94410
• https://www.executive-magazine.com/economics-policy/interview-with-ziad-hayek-secretary-general-of-the-high-council-of-privatization-and-ppp
  

Let me know what do you think. Thank you! NicoleKhaw (talk) 09:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

That looks good. See further issues below. Sorry if this process seems like a gauntlet. ~Kvng (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

@NicoleKhaw: I'm trying to get this review done. I have removed a bunch of uncited material per WP:BLP policy. Removal of more of the resume-like material would further improve the quality of the article. I notice that the second additional source you mention above (EconomistExecutive) is not cited in the article. Can you add that? Civen very negative comments from previous reviewers, RoySmith and StraussInTheHouse, I need to be careful about accepting this. ~Kvng (talk) 13:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

@Kvng: Sorry about the late reply. It is actually mentioned as the 35th source in the last paragraph of the text. I totally understand taking your time with the review just guide me through to be able to get a final end result :) Thank you!NicoleKhaw (talk) 12:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

I see it now. ~Kvng (talk) 14:02, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLP material

There is a lot of unreferenced material in the draft. This is of particular concern for articles on living subjects, see WP:BLP. To start with, the Early Life and Education section contains one reference which does not seem to support the claims about the subject's film. I have marked this section and I have marked the draft as a whole as reading like a resume because the balance of the article is a listing of positions held. Information that is not readily verifiable is subject to removal. ~Kvng (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

@Kvng:

Thank you for the explanation, I will apply the required amendments and get back to you. Thanks!NicoleKhaw (talk) 13:47, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

There is an earlier suspicion raised by RoySmith that we need to deal with. Are you, NicoleKhaw receiving any payment or otherwise have a conflict of interest with this subject? Wikipedia terms of use don't entirely prohibit editing in such cases but they do, at a minimum, require declaration. See WP:DCOI and WP:UPE for instructions. ~Kvng (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

@Kvng: I have answered this issue before, I didn't know how I should be writing the text exactly and the professional picture was taken by me with a professional canon camera. I assure you I ain't getting paid for this, or else I would have mastered it at attempt one LOL.NicoleKhaw (talk) 13:46, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

@NicoleKhaw: Thanks. Sorry for the repeat. ~Kvng (talk) 14:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Self Promotion

The majority of edits on this article come from a user "Zhayek" most probably the person himself, I don't think you're allowed to do your own autobiography Asharif88 (talk) 10:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)