This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
it says origin tibet and china so do both cats to be fair
- For now, but China has taken over Tibet and destroying the nation and people's ethnic integrity. China isn't Tibet though it claims it is. Nothing fair about that, bu not worth an edit war here. But this is one good reason why the "animal by country" thing is so stupid. It gets political. Montanabw(talk) 18:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- If it causes inter nation problems then taking it out of both would be fair but for now the only person with issue is yourself.Also much of these other horse articles are in ... by country cats anyway just not specific horse ones.Nirame (talk) 19:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- I was making a point about the problem of lumping breeds into national categories when geographical boundaries change. You clearly are also having a problem because you aren't listening to me or anyone else around here who is trying to explain things to you. We are trying to be nice, but I for one am tired of your tendentiousness and refusal to discuss matters with those of us who have been working on this project for years. We'd love to have help, but you aren't helping, you're just making more work for too few people. Montanabw(talk) 03:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)