Talk:Taxonomy of Narcissus
 | Taxonomy of Narcissus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 3, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Taxonomy of Narcissus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Fredlyfish4 (talk · contribs) 00:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
edit- Avoid saying things like "in the current century" as in the lead. Use specific dates, range of years, century, etc.
Done date inserted --Michael Goodyear (talk) 13:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- What exactly does "escape" refer to in the lead?
Done the same as in the text, escape from cultivation and subsequent naturalisation, a technical term in the evolution of speciation. Clarified. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Who accepted 160 species? All these other figures talked about with their authors, but not this one.
Done Adrian Haworth. Attributed now --Michael Goodyear (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
This looks good overall. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Duplicated "Names and etymology" sections
editBoth the Narcissus (plant) and Taxonomy of Narcissus articles have a "Names and etymology" section (here and here respectively). Any chance these could be combined to avoid duplication? Please discuss at Talk:Narcissus (plant) if you care. — AjaxSmack 15:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)