Talk:Superphénix
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Three of the references are broken, including "erreur404.org"... a joke? So we need to find replacements. Ultrarob 19:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
1.21GW? Really? 72.254.31.54 (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
yes, really (24.45.165.89 (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC))
the introduction was faaaar from neutral. It was obvious written by someone frantically opposed to nuclear energy. 189.216.180.254 (talk) 00:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Operation
editIs there any reason the 1998 date of closure shouldn't be the last item in this segment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.217.51 (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I suspect it to be an error and maybe it should be 1988? 77.188.176.250 (talk) 11:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Make sense of the "green" politics here?
editDoes anyone else find it baffling why a so-called pro-environmental group would take such drastic action against this plant? Aren't these the same people who are now complaining there is too much carbon dioxide in the air? Didn't it ever occur to them that would be the direct result of their anti-nuclear stance? Last time I checked, nuclear was the only commercially viable zero-CO2 option that could someday actually replace *all* use of "fossil fuels" for power generation. Zaphraud (talk) 09:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ask the japanese if they find it baffling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.59.119.38 (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I find it baffling. Many more Japanese died because of coal than because of nuclear energy. Now they complain that we can't do anything with the waste...189.216.180.254 (talk) 00:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
It is baffling because anti-nuclear protesters often raise the issue of security of nuclear plants, but the most dangerous terrorist attack to those facilities was carried out by a Green Party politician. Weird enough. The japanese, anyway, are reconsidering nuclear policy after Fukushima, but they are not having an atom exit: they elected an openly pro-nuclear mayor in Tokyo and an openly pro-nuclear PM like Shinzo Abe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.52.5.237 (talk) 11:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)