Talk:Kosianka Stara
(Redirected from Talk:Stara Kosianka)
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Bensci54 in topic Requested move 2 February 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 2 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Stara Kosianka to Kosianka Stara. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 2 February 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 17:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Stara Kosianka → Kosianka Stara – The same issue as with "Stare Bogusze". Do we need to double check every Polish village now? Ilawa-Kataka (talk) 15:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Poland has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. All Polish sources invariably refer to the village as "Kosianka Stara", not "Stara Kosianka". The proposed form is standard in Polish, where adjectives are frequently placed after nouns. A number of Wikipedias in other languages use main title header "Kosianka Stara" and those that do use "Stara Kosianka" must have indeed copied it from English Wikipedia which has carried the current incorrect header since its creation by a bot in July 2008. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The Polish wikipedia article was moved way back in February 2013, so the English wikipedia should follow suit. Kiwipete (talk) 02:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.