Talk:Shine On (Jet album)

Cph 2000

Is this the same album as this?

It's redirected now. ~ EmeZxX 06:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

No it isn't. That's a different album by a different artist called Jet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.175.87.31 (talk) 06:40, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Australian Release

Since Jet is an Australian band..why does it not say the Australian release on the page..? I haven't been able to find the date anywhere. ~ EmeZxX 06:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

transcode

the only available leak is the transcoded 192 version correct?

Atlantic Records?

The article page says the recording company is Elektra Records but I only see Atlantic Records on the album sleeve.

See Elektra_Records#Atlantic_absorption

Fair use rationale for Image:Jet Shine On.jpg

Image:Jet Shine On.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Pitchfork review

The oddest Pitchfork review, and probably the weirdest Wikipedia line I've read: "In contrast, the American review site Pitchfork posted a review containing only a video clip of a chimpanzee urinating into its own mouth, along with a score of 0.0 out of a possible 10" Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 15:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)