Talk:Shōnen manga/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cessaune (talk · contribs) 17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to review this article. Cessaune [talk] 17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry I'm taking so long. Will be finished in 2-3 days. Cessaune [talk] 18:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Here we go. This is only the first half; the rest will be finished late tommorow (not a promise!)

1. Well-written:

1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct Y
   • Prose is good; some of the best writing I've read in a while. Rivals my favorite article :)
2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation Y
   • Definitely does this.

3. Broad in its coverage:

1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic Y
   • Does this very well.
2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style) Y
   • Covers everything in detail. There's a lot here, but it isn't too broad in its coverage.

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each Y

• Definitely seems to do so.

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute Y

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content Y
2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions ?
   • The images that are currently there are good, but I think an image of an actual page would be useful, considering that this is a broad article about the most popular category of manga.

There are some issues with the citations; I've got to verify a few of them. Cessaune [talk] 02:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)